Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

TD 42 and td petrol use the same bottom end dan. the 4.5 and the 4.8 petrol jobs are also the same aprt from bore and stroke.

If you are gonna do it grab the 4.5 petrol number. Its a free 500 cc. The 4.8 would be the killer given that it already has the right head but its a bit thin on the ground.

Yeah but the TB45E has a bore/stroke of 99.5/96 whereas the TD42 has a bore/stroke of 96/96

The 4.5 will not rev as high as the 4.2 and the rod length/stroke ratio is right on for maximum torque and still being able to see 8k rpm.

I'm picking up the GT51R at the end of the financial year. :sorcerer:

  • Replies 222
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

well screw you all im building my dream xp falcon after the cefiro is finished, it will house a twin turbo 347ci small block ford than will make rb's tremble at the knees.

Ford...snicker snicker. tee hee. Oh fucit. ROFL

well screw you all im building my dream xp falcon after the cefiro is finished, it will house a twin turbo 347ci small block ford than will make rb's tremble at the knees.

Yeah but you asre forgettng something very important....at the end of the day.....

when all is done.........

and everyone has left.........

it's still a bloody FORD!

Ford...snicker snicker. tee hee. Oh fucit. ROFL

yeah sorry i can slot a hemi in there, not quite enough room.

go check out the trick and mansweto (sp) capri and tell us if a small block chev can crank like that thing

Quite sure. Mouse thats m.o.u.s.e. The rat family are the big blocks. Mouse motors are small blocks. Ya wanna rev get a chev. :P

dude i may be young but i know more about the old stuff than any thing else, and nothing revs like a small block ford.

but people have been having this same disscussion for more years than i have been alive and its never been settled so lets agree to disagree.

post-25915-1180353996_thumb.jpg

^^^^^^^ford power^^^^^^^^^

dude i may be young but i know more about the old stuff than any thing else, and nothing revs like a small block ford.

but people have been having this same disscussion for more years than i have been alive and its never been settled so lets agree to disagree.

post-25915-1180353996_thumb.jpg

^^^^^^^ford power^^^^^^^^^

Agreed. :P

Agreed. :P

see who said that the qld section needs moderating when there is gentlemen like noel and myself around

by the way RB20 RULZ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok interesting i guess ill wait till using a manual gauge before making assumptions.
    • Not in any way a logical conclusion. Also, looking at those logs, I struggle to see how that much oil pressure can go away that fast unless you are sucking air into the pickup. Meanwhile the ECU voltage is chucking a huge wobbly which seems to be tied to the throttle position. 100% throttle results in decreasing voltage. It's a mess.
    • So didn't get around to installing a manual oil pressure gauge and then decided to take the car for a cruisey drive to a cars and coffee and brought the laptop along with to get another log using more gears to see if its an oil pressure issue under acceleration or after. this log has 3 gears of WOT where as previous had 2 and the oil pressure dropped once on the brakes, and the same again happens here which is interesting as it shows it can hold oil pressure while under acceleration but once slowing or just the lower RPM after a pull pressure drops. I will be chucking a manual oil pressure gauge on to confirm but so far this makes me feel it is not an electrical issue. Something else i realised is the pressure sensor also is giving temperature information and the temp stays steady the whole time which makes me feel like the sensor itself is showing a true pressure reading.
    • LOL.... fk...   there goes 25K to make 200kW
    • For sure the later RB26 variants had a different setup (6 cam voltage sender?), but the RB25DE/DET share the same ECU pinout/PCB footprint, and at the ECU plug it ends up being 'throttle sensor in' & 'throttle sensor out' (to A/T TCU) ...you stick a multimeter on these pins and you'll find them directly connected (0 ohms) ; I had an pair of Nissan ECUs on the bench long ago, and I noticed this throttle sensor in/out link, actually linked to an op-amp ...which was unpopulated on the NA board, but present on the T board and I went 'ah-ha!' in some moment of clarity... ...it wouldn't surprise me if they changed strategy here though (in the software and actual monitoring of this signal), because they did with other stuff (A/T signals).. and 0.45v as a trigger point makes sense, as that's what the external TCU units expect at idle ; kudos, thanks for that insight...I suppose it boils down to whether or not Consult can display real time data of that signal's voltage... ...in any event, it presents the same target...ie; rotate TPS unit to achieve 0.45v to suit both ECU&TCU, and where do you goto from there? Just disconnect TPSwitch connector and/or that plus TPSensor connector....or do you go for the throat and disconnect IACV solenoid and see if it still stalls? (probably throws a recoverable fault code and goes for default idle strategy?)...
×
×
  • Create New...