Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 7 months later...
  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • 2 months later...

Reason I asked is my present exhaust has a 95dBA jasma plaque on it & it is only just audible over the tyre rumble. My previous 92dBA exhaust couldn't be heard at all.

The Trust wedsite had JASMA & 94 written against this exhaust - but it may just have been a reference to how many miles away they could hear the sonic boom. Who knows. Maybe they mean with the bunger stuck up it.

THis is a different 80mm type.

https://www.rhdjapan.com/jdm/TRUST-PETi-Pow...2-R33-R34-22075[/url]

Edited by djr81

i'd like to know how much croydon charge for it..

pm time!

titanium exhausts are generally alot louder than steel. they sound so good!

its definatly on my to do list for the track car :P

Edited by Angus Smart
you hooked this baby up yet? i want to hear how mean it sounds.

I have a few videos of this specific/exhaust in question but they are in cabin and... Well not particularly internet friendly so to speak

But yeah its loud but not ear peircing loud

Reason I asked is my present exhaust has a 95dBA jasma plaque on it & it is only just audible over the tyre rumble. My previous 92dBA exhaust couldn't be heard at all.

The Trust wedsite had JASMA & 94 written against this exhaust - but it may just have been a reference to how many miles away they could hear the sonic boom. Who knows. Maybe they mean with the bunger stuck up it.

THis is a different 80mm type.

https://www.rhdjapan.com/jdm/TRUST-PETi-Pow...2-R33-R34-22075[/url]

yep, they would have it at 94 with the bung in. with the bung out it will be very loud. :P

yes you cannot use any removable device (butterfly, bung, steel wool etc) to meet a noise test. it's not a recent chance, been like that as long as I can remember.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • FWIW the depth of the groove in the rubber pad is not super essential, the blocks are rubber and squish a bit. If you are worried an angle grinder will make a deeper groove quick smart
    • I mean, if you were to move the jacking points away from the original location, that is, away from the wheels and closer to the centreline of the car, then it will be more likely to overbalance and tip off the supports. Same as we talked about before. I was talking about moving for-aft. If the sill is bent outward or inward, then the car would obviously look unstraight from the outside. Hopefully that hasn't happened either. Again, you can do comparative measurements from the chassis rails to see if there is much deflection.
    • Can you elaborate what you mean with your first sentence? I meant move as in the bulge kinda seemed like it got pulled "outward" meaning it got pulled down and to the side with the jacking rail itself, so the load bearing bulge now sits lower than usual and is not level with the sill on the other side of the jack point. Either that or the jacking rail just got pushed in a good bit.
    • As well as being risky WRT tipping off anyway. Yeah, I wouldn't expect it to move. Just measure from the rear one to the front one on the good side, then measure that same length on the wrecked side. You will find the notches in the pinchweld, and the jacking pad. Just spray a spot of marker paint or something there.
    • but any other area than the bulge you are talking about will just cave in then? The front driver side is pretty bent so I don't know if that will work the way it is now. I can still kinda make out where that bulge is/was but it looks like the position of it also changed due to all the mistreatment? Hard to tell
×
×
  • Create New...