Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

pretty sad that ive been driving the car for a year and i still dont know what this button is for .... lol.

the button is located on the left hand side of the streering wheel

sorry about the quality of the pic i took it on my phone at night.

post-34650-1180779591.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/171139-diff-lock-button/
Share on other sites

don't see how it can make a difference - unless there is wheel spin it doesn't matter about what the torque split is off the line. And I'll be stuffed if I can get any wheelspin no matter how much I abuse it.

Exactly.....

Mine neither.... In theory using the 50/50 will limit the torque to the front/rear, and therefore if you encountered wheelspin, it just might actually be slower off the line. If you get wheelspin.... get fatter tyres!! :laughing-smiley-014:

The auto trans is that clever that I just let it do it's thing.... in this case computers rule..... (probably 'cos Bill FN Gates had nothing to do with it. Otherwise you have to have the windows open to start the fkin thing!!!).

Exactly.....

Mine neither.... In theory using the 50/50 will limit the torque to the front/rear, and therefore if you encountered wheelspin, it just might actually be slower off the line. If you get wheelspin.... get fatter tyres!! :laughing-smiley-014:

The auto trans is that clever that I just let it do it's thing.... in this case computers rule..... (probably 'cos Bill FN Gates had nothing to do with it. Otherwise you have to have the windows open to start the fkin thing!!!).

But I was under the imppression that the 50/50 diff lock just starts off at that ratio instead of 95/5 AND still distribute torque accordingly.

But I was under the imppression that the 50/50 diff lock just starts off at that ratio instead of 95/5 AND still distribute torque accordingly.

This is more correct. After a certain RPM (or at least once you get higher into the rev range, say over 2500rpm?) the awd system will still put more torque to the rear as necessary, but will favour 50:50. With the button off, its the same principle but it would instead favour 95:5. Hope that makes sense :thumbsup:

As far as being faster, I would imagine it WOULD be slightly faster mainly because driving the front wheels will likely help with the weight transfer, not sure if this is correct - I might be way off the truth, but IMO it would be better to share the acceleration over all 4 wheels, than just the rears...who knows?

In any case, under full load the awd system will basically be running 50:50 torque split anyway, so the difference between button on/off when under hard acceleration is probably nil or at least minimal. :D

It is worth noting however that the system is not really designed to be used in 50:50 mode full time for daily driving and a few people have cautioned using it like this for fear of burning out the clutch packs prematurely... I'd like to think it was built strong enough to handle it but I'm not willing to risk it :) Occasionally I'll use 50:50 for driving in the wet but only in extreme weather conditions and bad road surfaces...

well who knows, in practice I think it would make bugger all difference...but on the dyno our gtr makes about 10% at the wheels more in RWD than in 4WD

You definately don't want to run in 50/50 mode all the time, we burned out the clucth packs in the race car running lots of front torque in about 30 minutes - lost all fwd until we rebuilt the transfer case

With 205's + wet road = 4wd spin from a standing start, with the 50/50 button pressed or not. It's really weird when the car does not move forward, rather lurches suddenly sideways, following the lean of the road.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...