Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all just a curiosity question, I was speaking to a very experienced and knowledgeable mechanic and has told me to not use a SAFC of any kind because they are known to cause problems and headaches, I assume because it tricks the factory ecu. what do you guys think??

i'm also keen to hear responses from this question, as I'm thinking bout getting one too. I've heard mixed opinions about them. has anyone found they got better fuel consumption with one?? i'm currently getting a ridiculous 250km per tank (and no i'm not running super rich a/f ratio's)

They do the job for there intended purpose. I had one and never had any problems with it. Although it depends on what your doing to your car. For light mods and I had no intention of changing the turbo a SAFC was fine. But if your wanting to go further down the mod path then that a replacement ECU is essential.

a SAFC can help your fuel economy a little but it will get no where near as good as a Power FC.

They can be worth the hassle if you only have minor mods. any upgrade of the injectors or turbo and its Power FC time.

Hey all just a curiosity question, I was speaking to a very experienced and knowledgeable mechanic and has told me to not use a SAFC of any kind because they are known to cause problems and headaches, I assume because it tricks the factory ecu. what do you guys think??

What problems and what headaches?

I bet you he gets stuck trying to list them all, because there are none.

As already stated, they do what they are made for quite well

I dont know about causing headaches and what not.

But the tune will never be perfect and you wont be able to fix your flat spot problems or whatnot.

I mean, if you cant afford a proper ecu, then safc would be worth it for what it is.

Uni-group (if you live in sydney), actually told me you will find good gains with it on an r33. Other cars not worth it.

I might purchase the apexi neo sometime soon, and get it tuned and see what it can do.

Fair few actually have the safc in there cars.

50/50 i guess.. some ppl say not worth it.. some ppl will say get it

a SAFC can help your fuel economy a little but it will get no where near as good as a Power FC.

They can be worth the hassle if you only have minor mods. any upgrade of the injectors or turbo and its Power FC time.

i'm in the process of getting my car engineered. i saw ur thread about u getting ur car to pass emission laws with a power fc.

do u think its possible with an safc??

and did the emissions test cost u anything?

how long did it take?

i'm in the process of getting my car engineered. i saw ur thread about u getting ur car to pass emission laws with a power fc.

do u think its possible with an safc??

and did the emissions test cost u anything?

how long did it take?

I think we should get back on topic

i had an safc 2 in my r33 with absolutly no problem at all... it does help considering when you put a little boost into an r33 it seems to run rich, this just corrects the air fuel ratios and leans it out a little giving you better economy etc. etc.

as for headaches i don't think there actually are any... nothing i've heard of anyways.

I only got rid of mine because i got a power fc otherwise i would have kept it... done me well

I love mine, never going back, there are so many things you cn do if you have the know how. You can actaully play a bit with timming in these if you now how. An adjustable fuel pressure reg helps to iron out some issues too.

I originaly got a 40rwKw increasy from stock boost and setup to safcII and 10psi and now an maped computer and safc ii for trimmings as needed and i managed 217 rwKws at 14.9 psi on a stock turbo.

I love mine, never going back, there are so many things you cn do if you have the know how. You can actaully play a bit with timming in these if you now how. An adjustable fuel pressure reg helps to iron out some issues too.

I originaly got a 40rwKw increasy from stock boost and setup to safcII and 10psi and now an maped computer and safc ii for trimmings as needed and i managed 217 rwKws at 14.9 psi on a stock turbo.

Thats cool but i was reading before you had starting issues could it have been related to the safc??? 40kw increase?? thats pretty amazing a lil too amazing.

Edited by LatinR33

don't be looking at rwkw gains in regards to upgrades etc.

i got 214.9rwkw at the chasers dyno when i only had a bleed valve @ 12psi, exhuast from turbo back, fmic and the safc2

as R31nismoid said, does you tuner know what problems and headaches you will get with a safc?

Hey all just a curiosity question, I was speaking to a very experienced and knowledgeable mechanic and has told me to not use a SAFC of any kind because they are known to cause problems and headaches, I assume because it tricks the factory ecu. what do you guys think??

Another vote for "they do what they are intended to do"

I've had one and the only problem was a bit of gravel rash on the knees from installing the bugger.

..but considering I've owned/installed/removed and Power FC installed, i'd skip it even for minor mods and go straight to the FC.

The mid range, even untuned, is amazing compared to standard

Sounds like your mechanic maybe didn't know how to tune them (although they are quite easy to do...on their own at least).??

Had no trouble at all with my SAFC - it works GREAT, and for the money they are excellent value for money. Cost me $400 including a good dyno tune (got mine 2nd hand) and saves me 2L/100km now, which equates to about $5-12 every time I fuel up (every week for me). So it will pay itself off in less than a year, and give me more performance potential at the same time. :D

Its your only option for an auto unless you want to shell out big $$ for a E-Manage + tune...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If the RB29 box in the car is a push clutch, then yes, you will need to deal with the pull clutch on the turbo box. You either buy a pull clutch and don't use the old one, or you do the things needed to convert the turbo box's clutch arrangement over to push. Which is a bit of a f**karound. "Making" a custom tailshaft is the easy part. But you will need to source the front clip yoke - the bit that goes into the output of the gearbox. These are not as easy to find. They are out there, but they don't grow on trees the way that they used to.
    • Indicator bulbs are way too bright to use as a "corner marker" (we call them parking lights too). Sure. Go ahead and do it. But realise that you wil need to come up with all your own wiring to do it, as no-one will have a standard howto worked out for Skylines. It's just a matter of abandoning everything that Nissan have done and starting from scratch. You'd probably be better off retrofitting tailght/brakelight globe bases into the front indicator housings and using the taillight circuit for your corner marker and the brake light as the indicator. You'd need to work out how to kill the marker circuit while the indicator is flashing, otherwise it won't flash on-off, just bright-less bright.
    • Hi. A little bit of an update. It maybe(hope not) looks like i would need a new tranny(it would be "maybe" a cheaper or better option anyway) So i need some info. I know i need a different propshaft(i can make custom one) LSD is not a problem cuz the engine will be still(for now) N/A RB20. So if i buy RB25DET NEO tranny...is there something else i need? I read something about push/pull type but i do not know if i need to "change" something or i can just plug n play onto my engine a go? Thanks for the advice  
    • Good morning all, Bit of a random question but figured I’d finally throw it out after wondering for a long while. Before I start, I'm hoping to do this purely out of personal preference. I think it would look better at night, and don't mind at all spending a few hours and dollars to get it done. I've copied this from a non-Skyline specific forum, so I apologize for the explanation of our headlight switch setup that we all know. Here we go: Zero lights (switch off) Parking lights (switch position 1) being a rectangular marker on the outside of the housing, my low beam being the projector in the centre (position 2), and a high beam triggered by my turn signal stalk. Most North American cars I’ve owned of this era have power to the amber corner (turning indicator) light as part of the first switch (parking lights). I’d love to have these amber corners receive power when the headlights and parking lights are on (headlight switch), yet still blink when using the turn signal which is of course a separate switch. Hopefully I’ve explained my question correctly. Is anyone aware of a way in which I might be able to achieve this? Thanks in advance
    • My heads are cathedral port! It's likely possible, but I don't want to add any extra moving parts (I know they don't move) between the heads, manifolds, etc. It will also affect how injectors/fuel rails etc sit and I don't really know if it would change how the FAST manifold goes/sits/fits. I have the LS6 steam pipes already as I have a very late LS1 block so it should be fine. I couldn't find anyone who had ever actually used one for this purpose, it seems 100% of people grind the water pump. The thermal spacers are 12mm and are half way to the cost of the newer water pump anyhow... so if it comes to that I suppose I'd rather buy a new pump. The bearing in the pump I do have is a little.. clunky, but it hasn't done that much time and I never noticed it when the car was together in the past few years, so..
×
×
  • Create New...