Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I've changed my mind.. Next drag meet I want to run the RB20DET i'm going to slap her on the dyno and find the sweet spot with boost and timing. Maybe 16psi and 20degree's not sure.. :) Should be able to hit 170rwkw if all goes well and hopefully in to the 13's with my cheapo simex tyres.

Problem is the clutch doesn't like launches with the simex tyres and slips when I click second. :)

Originally posted by RevsPerMin

Phew! Glad to hear that everyone had a ball! And yep, me too considering....

Thanks Matt Whatsisname for organising it as well !

What do you guys reacon, should we plan another meet in August sometime?

No prob's Iv. Happy to help out mate :P

Felt sorry for you big time mate :P 1 full pass (that was a total right-off) & then the CV letting go. Better luck next time.

I'm keen for August!

I'd say the following will be keen for another run asap (ie August)...

MattR

whatsisname

Martin - The Soarer with a stronger g/box!?

Ivan

Grepin

Freebaggin

......anyone else?

I WILL be running this time Matt.

I want to see what I can real off with the stock RB20DET.

I was talking to Tim a few days ago and he was telling me that Microtech are releasing a L16 I think it was that had provision for traction control, knock sensor closed loop etc.. :uh-huh:

it does not have 400kw at the wheels( around 340 i think), and it dosent matter how much power you have if you cant get to the ground you dont go fast. After the engine there is a clutch, gearbox, diff and tyres all of these need to be 100% to get a good time.

Hippy,

I think you'll find Martin's Soarer was closer to 350rwkw on Elf Turbomax fuel. The 120+mph terminal speed on one of the earlier less troublesome passes is a good indication it has MUCH more in it. I say, "less troublesome", as Simon didn't get one clean pass. Good burnouts though :P

Oh yeah, Martin's Soarer would weight near on 1700kg with a driver onboard. 120+mph on an very average pass pulling 1700kg is about what I'd expect for 350rwkw.

Clint,

Hehe, Yeah true :D I actually asked Martin, "how he felt about someone else thrashing his car?" He had faith in Simon's ability to keep everything together.

The Soarer's 'box had already been rebuilt sometime ago (was a feature in HPI or Zoom). The 1JZGTE Soarer 5sp box is a POS according to those in the know. The 2JZGTE Getrag (sp?) is a faaar better box.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
    • That's less offensive than the previous gen.....except for all that ugly black tupperware around the edges. Blerck!
    • I leant out the window recently and took a picture of this new WRX. It looked real damn fine in person. It's faster around a track (stock) than a (stock) GR Yaris. It's much more practical despite being heavier. It's significantly cheaper. This gen tunes really well, much better than others. .... I think they're probably a lot better than people expect.
    • WRXs are a pure pleb boring car these days. You need to get an STI to even get close to what a WRX used to be.
×
×
  • Create New...