Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys im about to install my super coppermix clutch and i want to set it for the 1,000kg clamp pressure.. any idea on how i will do that? does it come like that from the factory? or would i need to set it to that?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/171574-nismo-super-coppermix/
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • 9 months later...

I got a problem with my coppermix. I got a single plater for a 33gtst. After the job was all done, I found it incredibly hard to select gears, specifically 1st, 2nd, and reverse. I started to do a bit of troubleshooting, so I did a bleed on the slave and master clutch cylinder. After that didn't work I removed and re-fitted the gearstick, to see if the problem was in the shifting mechanism. No good.

I started scratching my head a little, and this is where I need your advice guys!

I remembered back to fitting the new thrust bearing that I got with the clutch kit. I'd whacked off the old bearing carefully with a rubber mallet. I then pressed on the new bearing. I noticed that the new bearing sat shorter on the old bearing carrier then the old bearing. I didn't think this would be a problem at the time, but now I think it's causing my clutch to not fully disengage, because the bearing is shorter it's not pressing against the pressure plate as much as the old clutch. And now it's messing up the synchro's in the gearbox.

Could this be a good reason for the gearbox playing up? Is it possible to get longer bearing carriers? Can I just get a whole heap of big washers to put on the bearing carrier (lol)?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...