Jump to content
SAU Community

Front Camber Adjustment

ecr33noob
 Share

Recommended Posts

salad Veteran

salad

Posted
Posted (edited)

You have double wishbone front suspension so adjustable strut tops are useless, they're to suit Silvias and other cars with Macpherson struts.

You'd need the adjustable upper arm, but you should probably look into adjustable bushes if you dont intend on heavy track work.

SK's groupbuy has them and I'd say they're cheaper than the Cusco arms.

Edited by salad
ecr33noob Apprentice

ecr33noob

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
You have double wishbone front suspension so adjustable strut tops are useless, they're to suit Silvias and other cars with Macpherson struts.

You'd need the adjustable upper arm, but you should probably look into adjustable bushes if you dont intend on heavy track work.

SK's groupbuy has them and I'd say they're cheaper than the Cusco arms.

cheers mate...thanks for the information

how about this item??

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAP...me=STRK:MEWA:IT

Edited by ecr33noob
salad Veteran

salad

Posted
Posted

They're for the rear of the car. It's a traction rod, you need them and rear adjustable upper control arms to adjust camber properly. They have called them front upper arms because they are in front of the actual upper control arm (my guess).

  • 2 weeks later...
Beer Baron Grand Master

Beer Baron

Posted
Posted

well if it is camber that is causing the tyre wear then there are only two ways out. raise the car if it's lowered. raising the car will reduce the negative static camber. OR buy some form of camber adjustment for the front. Either adjustable upper arms, or adjustable bushes. but first get the alingment checked so you can figure out what exactly is causing the tyre wear. it could be toe, could be camber.

castor rods wont sold the problem. as their name implies they only adjust caster.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Duncan
      Turn signal wiring question

      By Duncan · Posted

      That may not be so tricky with a changeover relay (again, with LED indicator only to reduce load on existing headlight + source)  30 to indicator + globe side 86 and 87 to headlight parker + 87a to original indicator + chassis side 85 to chassis/earth repeat on each corner, sorted, no diode required
    • The Bogan
      Using Trickle Chargers

      By The Bogan · Posted

      There might have been some "hard core" decalcification going on in the cells to create that noise As for chargers, I stick all our cars on a trickle charger every few months to "clean out their pipes/cells", the Mrs battery in her Mistsu ASX is still running its OEM from new battery 10 years on, and that thing does alot of short drives, and it can sit around for ages without a good long run
    • MBS206
      Turn signal wiring question

      By MBS206 · Posted

      I'm not sure the diode only will give the desired result. I'd probably approach it with a couple of relays (And you still might need a diode too!). You need to be able to break the constant feed from the headlight to the orange corner globe when the indicator is flashing. Not knowing which Skyline we're talking about specifically here too (And it may not matter, but I don't know the R34 column switches) you'd likely need to rewire the stalk, so that the indicator power itself no longer runs through the stalk too, as now you need it able to trigger a relay that will break the constant supply from the headlights to the indicator, then you'll need a separate relay to trigger the indicators to come on (Replacing the internal action of the indicator stalk).
    • The Bogan
      Import insurance in 2025

      By The Bogan · Posted

      Weird story from me My Toyota 86 was with Commbank comprehensive but for market value (who they use to underwrite is unknown) When I munted it beyond financially viable repair in 2020, rear end smashed in to the point it bent the rear quarter and roof, they knew I paid $31k cash for it because I told them, they still paid me out $38k, as all the 2017 limited edition variants with typical Km and condition were going for between $36-41k, so they did weird math and came up with $38k I never officially mentioned any of the mods that I had done, but as they were not the cause of the crash they were not fussed at all, the insurance inspector actually asked if I wanted to replace all the mods with the OEM stuff if I still had it laying around before they took the car I still came out of it behind though, because I had probably dropped $20k in it with the suspension (bent after the prang), wheels (bent as well) and "other" mods, that the inspector asked about But still, as the market value was higher than what I initially paid, and they paid out market value To say I was surprised with the outcome would be an understatement  Weird, but true, but probably just lucky with the inspector on the day I guess  Sadly, I don't think if I munted the old NC1 MX5 I would get the same result Meh, pay to play
    • The Bogan
      NC MX5

      By The Bogan · Posted

      Well, the car is back, all straight and shiny, for how long for is anyone's guess  After picking it up we went for a bit of a drive, Jebus I really enjoy driving this little thing, hopefully the weather let's us go for a nice long cruise this weekend as it will be out of my hands for at least a few days next week when it heads back into Mania on Monday It's weird, whilst I do always enjoy going for a drive, the NC makes me feel like a kid who has just got his first car, and they just want to drive wherever and whenever they can I really need to look into the MX5 Club of NSW
×
×
  • Create New...