Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm a bit off topic here, but what the hell...

2 years ago i ditched the rb20 for a 25 and was a very happy boy. Admittedly my rb20 was shagged.

There are only 2 rb20's i know of that make me wonder if i made the right decision. Roy's with his stock bottom end and 260 odd rwkw and Legend01's built 2.1L with 300 plus and silly good response/midrange considering the size of the turbo.

Back on topic, get the car you like. If you like r32's or cef's then there are people out there doing pretty good things with rb20's, or you could go a 25det conversion. If you like 180's, then don't, whatever you do, put an rb in it. I hang around with way too many s chassis owners and i can tell you that up to 230rwkw on a stock bottom end sr is easily acheivable and a hell of a lot of fun with excellent midrange power and torque. If you buy the right car with the right mods on it to start with you will be able to do a hell of a lot with it before you spend your way through 23k

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If you wanted to buy a car just to sound good then buy a cheap aussie V8 with a big exhaust.

Personally i buy cars to perform, not for the sound.

Was a joke :kiss: Just cant stand the sound of them.

If I was to buy a car on sound of a car would be a massive - cammed ls1, so you can see it hasnt influenced my decision :D Especially as I use to own an Ls1!

Whos to say teh SR is so great? weak rocker arms ... 4cyl motor...

they may be one hell of a good motor... but at the end of the day why diss the RB20???

it makes more power than an SR stock...

its more reliable... 6cyl meaning it can handle larger amounts of power alot better than the SR... so reliability wise id be choosing the RB ... in fact i did :kiss:

my RB is in the process for 300rwkw... in my 1via...

and best part of all $600 to replace a motor... swap mods across yourself... way better option IMO ...

Love the RB in my Sil...

But we really want to know where you can get a 300rwkw capable rb bottom end for $600 :D

You will laugh, provided you can get a turbo to do it and not rev over 7,500rpm i think the engine would take it. I have often thought about throwing away my 20G and going T67-25G. Just for shits and giggles, as im curious to see how it goes myself. My thinking is it would probably be ok. Look at Ad4m, he is a nutter, running 24psi through a std RB20 with the same turbo as me to make 282rwkws. Thats getting close to 300rwkws and he has been running flat 12 sec 1/4 mile times in a manual 4 dr R32.

So i dont think its the 300rwkws that will hurt the RB20 (std bottom end). Its the power delivery and the need to rev the thing to well over 8,000rpm to get a good power band. Much easier to put forged pistons in it and run 24psi on a smaller turbo, something like a GT30R or a TD06-20G will bag you between 280-300rwkws. Do the same thing on a std bottom end and you are likely to get plenty of fun out of the motor. But based on what i have seen i think that may be pushing too hard from a std motor. Time will tell, i plan on upping boost to 1.65bar when i get the new gearbox and suspension in. Will thrown it back on the dyno and see what power it makes with the extra 5psi. If it makes 285rwkws or thereabout then thats what i will run.

If it makes that power for 5-6 track days then that will make up my mind to just stick with the std RB20, just be happy with 20psi and 260-270rwkws :)

i gotta say i never bothered to reply to this gay thread...

...but i love the rb20? i don't get why everyone bags it out?

i see no problem with it, mine's an rb20de+T and it runs sweetly i wouldn't change it to an SR for the world somply cos i just think everyone nutrides the SR for no good reason!

Whos to say teh SR is so great? weak rocker arms ... 4cyl motor...

they may be one hell of a good motor... but at the end of the day why diss the RB20???

it makes more power than an SR stock...

its more reliable... 6cyl meaning it can handle larger amounts of power alot better than the SR... so reliability wise id be choosing the RB ... in fact i did :)

my RB is in the process for 300rwkw... in my 1via...

and best part of all $600 to replace a motor... swap mods across yourself... way better option IMO ...

Love the RB in my Sil...

Well we have what i would consider the perfect 300+rwkw onevia... super responsive... loves to rev....makes a super lazy 312rwkw on literally std wastegate pressure... big dollar suspension.... but it still sucks to fang round a track compared to the built SR that proceeded it, dont get me wrong the power is nice but the package is not, it is handicapped by the weight over the front wheels.

Remmeber this post is about whether a rb20 in a s series is a good idea... i cant think of one unless the car was CA18DE to start with.

RB20 is good....rb20+s series chassis= poo...

Remmeber this post is about whether a rb20 in a s series is a good idea... i cant think of one unless the car was CA18DE to start with.

RB20 is good....rb20+s series chassis= poo...

agreed^^ f.y.i the cars that my mates rb20 went up against had tomei cams,t28 steel wheel turbo's on close to 20psi some of them with power fc,z32 etc nizmo 740 injectors, << that was one particular car. my mates car has stock standard rb20, microtech ecu, r34 neo turbo on 16psi,fmic etc the usual stuff and made more power, lets get off the sr20 love boat for a secoend and realise that the rb20 can be a good thing..

Is starting or ending a sentence with 3 dots a new fad? Or does it strengthen an argument? Let me try ;) I feel the need to fit in...

Comparing stock to stock is irrelevant as the engine will have bolt ons...mod for mod is where it's at as dead 32 has indicated with his example...

Though i'm pretty certain cubes is right about the rb20 having higher peak torque (when stock)...

nah, the dots don't work for me. :)

Edited by BHDave
Is starting or ending a sentence with 3 dots a new fad? Or does it strengthen an argument? Let me try ;) I feel the need to fit in...

nah, the dots don't work for me. :)

:nyaanyaa:

Actually the reason is, because we are reading and not actually hearing another person talk, it simulates a person pausing for a moment during his sentence. This pausing can indicate the person is thinking during his sentence. Or alternatively, it can indicate an unfinished sentence.

This can be due to the person typing having either:

1. Further thoughts on the matter but not typing them.

2. Not knowing what else to say/type or is still thinking.

3. Leaving his sentence open to someone else to complete, or in other words, leaving a window open for the next person to continue on on the same thought.

Eg. Little Johnny yelled out to his father "But dad I......but I didn't.......I think I didn't.......maybe I did do it."

Or

"If Johnny did do it, maybe it was because he wanted to, and for no other reason..."

I hope that makes things easier to understand :domokun:

Ok kids that's our English lesson for today.

Anyway back on topic. SR20 vs RB20....:cheers:

Edited by KeyMaker

Actually, come to the SAU drad day at Heathcote next weekend (sat) and lets line them up. I dont care who is quickest, it will be fun to line up the cars and have a laugh at GTR owners munching gearboxes, R32 GTSt owners crying about nursing gearboxes and R33 owners complaining about wheelspin the whole track with only 180rwkws :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yuck. But it's kinda the same principle, moving timing around to make car run bad but sound good.... I went for a more spirited tuning drive to iron out a few things. Car no longer stalls, and it loved to dip RPM low when you clutch in. After tuning this (and the 4-5 tables that HPTuners/LS1 OEM ECU wants for idle air correction) it's now behaving somewhat normal. All expected because there's a new TB, new Intake manifold and that new TB which is 102mm vs 78... has an entirely different IAC passage which is smaller because ????? Unfortunately at this point I went to make further fine tuning changes to avoid it flaring up, you know... _tuning_ the HPTuners dongle died. Well to be more accurate - The USB cable died in a fashion that anyone who has ever charged a phone will recognize. After the app demanding I resync it 50 or so times (which all 'succeeded' but all failed) the device does not want to sync and I've logged a ticket with support to see if it's fixable. US Support said it was a 'storage issue' but after removing the SD card inside it and formatting it/fixing it the issue does persist. Unfortunately usually the fix is "Turn in your old dongle and pay $700 for the upgraded one" it's cheaper because I get some free licence credits I unfortunately don't need. However I'm 10 minutes down the road from HP Tuners AUS/VCM so at least I won't need to post it, and logged a new ticket for support over here. Definitely drives different. My SOTP dyno believes it's probably making 310-320kw instead of the 280 before.  It scrambles for traction a little now whereas it previously different. It drives like a bigger cam car up top even though the cam is smaller, likely due to the cam not being advanced 6 degrees. The timing is deliberately low and the fuel is very rich so who knows if this will improve on the dyno. It may, imperceptably. Also funny is removing the pineapples definitely makes the car squat more and axle tramp less. So this behavior of having more top end, squatting more, and scrabbling for traction more makes me think = more power. But I could have just been sitting on the threshold of that kind of behavior before. Time will tell if my butt dyno is calibrated right. I need the exhaust leaks fixed before dyno tune for obvious AFR related reasons - I repositioned the pipes but I'm not confident it's fully sealed even if it is better. At least the car does drive around while I cannot tweak/tune it for now. And I have aircon again. medium success!
    • Don't use that manifold. Please don't use that manifold. Sunk cost fallacy is not worth the later pain. None of these will be relevant to the change that will come from the different turbo and manifold. As in, the effect of the exhaust will be nil, regardless of what else is changed. And all the cam and fuel system stuff is not changing either way, so has no effect. The turbo and manifold (and to a small extent the wastegate)....big change.
    • Just wanted to say thank you for your input   my man (lead mechanic by trade) and I have done a heap of work as you can imagine just to make the hot side work with the dump pipe, stupid massive intake on turbo, trying to get the waste gate on was not fun.  I’m kinda getting to the point where I don’t know if I try and make this work and not throw all this cash and time away or do I scrap the lot and start again? the Apexi I’ve got was tuned for a few slight differences:   Tomei pon cams (mine are stock neo) Turbo smart 38mm external waste gate (mines 45mm replumbed) with stainless screamer pipe  3inch turbo back exhaust with high flow cat Sard 800cc top feed injectors Sard adjustable fuel pressure reg    
    • Out here E90s are the cheapest way into a sporty-ish car because everyone knows just how expensive the repairs can get. 8-10k USD for an automatic 335i. 
    • Noted. Have noticed BMW are more 'high maintenance' for sure. They've attracted my attention as I think the used car prices seem reasonable vs other options, and the extra quality overall vs a commodore / camry / corolla or similar of the same vintage is appealing, especially the interior, and they are more on the sporty side whereas the others mentioned can be more cruising or economical A-to-B only.
×
×
  • Create New...