Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

CP'S are good. they usually mesure up all the same. (no variation in size)

wiesco are also very good but usually reqire individual boring as they vary in size a little. ie 1-3thou diferance in diametre

both need balancing and both use good rings (file back) and wrist pins :) but both like all american pistons have a faily loose piston to bore clearance. so unless the ring gaps are perfect they will "breath" a little

CP'S are good. they usually mesure up all the same. (no variation in size)

wiesco are also very good but usually reqire individual boring as they vary in size a little. ie 1-3thou diferance in diametre

both need balancing and both use good rings (file back) and wrist pins :) but both like all american pistons have a faily loose piston to bore clearance. so unless the ring gaps are perfect they will "breath" a little

i dont like cp rings, i would substitute them.... but like R31NISMOID said listen to your builder as there are some brands i just wont use and some require more work to get satisfactory results...

oh yeah do not use thier recommended piston to bore.... way to big.

CP'S are good. they usually mesure up all the same. (no variation in size)

wiesco are also very good but usually reqire individual boring as they vary in size a little. ie 1-3thou diferance in diametre

both need balancing and both use good rings (file back) and wrist pins :) but both like all american pistons have a faily loose piston to bore clearance. so unless the ring gaps are perfect they will "breath" a little

breath a little, as in show leak on a leakdown test ?

Can get both for the same money, so it seems the cp ones are the best choice ?

and R31Nismoid, builder doesn't know which one is better :banana:

edit : hmmm,mr uras above seems to not like the cp ones ?

Edited by -wj-

I work for someone who happens to do alot work with CP PISTONS and abit of WISECO...

The way i look at it is.... If the V8 Supercars and numerous Top Door Slammers use CP Pistons and we havent seen a failure because of a cp piston or ring (aslong as there installed properly!!!!!!) then i think that speaks for itself.

Wiseco arent even in the same league..... there measurements for standard off the shelf pistons vary way too much and dont even get me started on there custom pistons!!!

The only problem with CP PISTONS is the timeframe for custom pistons..... 6 - 8 weeks (but we havent had any returns of custom pistons yet, they look and perform unreal!)

Cheers BOOSTA (Pete)

breath a little, as in show leak on a leakdown test ?

Can get both for the same money, so it seems the cp ones are the best choice ?

and R31Nismoid, builder doesn't know which one is better :banana:

edit : hmmm,mr uras above seems to not like the cp ones ?

Thats a warning sign mate.

If a builder has to ask which are better suited then they havent built an RB before, and certainly havent used a range of pistons.

Is there anyone else you can use? Its a big expense to stuff up :)

Thats a warning sign mate.

If a builder has to ask which are better suited then they havent built an RB before, and certainly havent used a range of pistons.

Is there anyone else you can use? Its a big expense to stuff up :)

the man has done alot of work for me, always top notch. Just no experience with RB25DET's.

so now we have Boosta and Uras saying 2 very different things :banana:

Any more opinions ? I'm leaning towards the cp ones, by te way....

WJ........

CP Pistons speak for themselves...... go have a chat to engine builders who use them in many different applications!

The way i look at it is, the proof is in the evidence of the product and the people who use them, I have seen Cp's in engines from the V8 Supercar Engines to V8 Twin Turbo'd Dune Buggies to 2 x Lamborghini V12 engines.

They all use the CP Pistons and the Ringsets provided by CP to suit the pistons.... Having said that Cp Pistons arent responsible for people who sell pistons with the wrong ring sets in them.

Wiseco are great for lots of different options but if you really are chasing pistons that are above the normal.... CP's are a great choice,

Cheers BOOSTA (pete)

WJ........

CP Pistons speak for themselves...... go have a chat to engine builders who use them in many different applications!

The way i look at it is, the proof is in the evidence of the product and the people who use them, I have seen Cp's in engines from the V8 Supercar Engines to V8 Twin Turbo'd Dune Buggies to 2 x Lamborghini V12 engines.

They all use the CP Pistons and the Ringsets provided by CP to suit the pistons.... Having said that Cp Pistons arent responsible for people who sell pistons with the wrong ring sets in them.

Wiseco are great for lots of different options but if you really are chasing pistons that are above the normal.... CP's are a great choice,

Cheers BOOSTA (pete)

I tend agree with the wiseco comment, we used a lot of wiseco pistons in race bikes (with no dramas) but i have heard from plenty of skyline guys (not from personal experience mind you) that the wisecos are not the greatest.

comparing V8 supercars and top fuelers to your average rb is hardly a good comparison.

Overall the most important factor with pistons is the machinst and the installer.... both of with determnine the sucess or failure of a build. I can recount 100's of stories of late of customers who have engines built that are so loose they trip the knock sensors..... these were built by so-called reputable shops.... the same guys who build top end v8 engines...

I haven't heard of any CP's failing for reasons of bad manufacturing but I haven't heard of any Wisecos doing that either. Have you Pete? (Not attacking, just asking.)

I used Wisecos because they have a longer skirt so I think they stay more square in the bore which should long term result in less bore wear. Also the skirts are teflon coated from factory so less friction.

I think they recommend something like 5-6 thou piston to bore clearance (can't remember for sure though tbh). I used 2.5 and have had no issues.

I haven't heard of any CP's failing for reasons of bad manufacturing but I haven't heard of any Wisecos doing that either. Have you Pete?

I think they recommend something like 5-6 thou piston to bore clearance (can't remember for sure though tbh). I used 2.5 and have had no issues.

yeah same deal with ARIAS, i use alot of ARIAS (great cheap piston) in jap engines and unless you tighten them up they rattle like all hell and you get excessive ventilation.

URAS... and ABO,

Your both correct, the wiseco's are a decent piston and readily available in many different shops.... In the end if the engine builder doesnt know how to install pistons correctly (hell CP even have instructions to follow for there pistons and rings)

As for the difference between the V8 supercar pistons etc, they are all made by the same machinists at CP Pistons and with the same material as ur standard off the shelf Forged Rb20, Rb25, Rb26, Rb30, Rb30/25/26head, etc etc <--- CP Stock

The only difference in the standard forged pistons to the customs is things like X Forgings, lateral gas ports, vertical gas ports, anti detonation grooves etc etc ( plus the basic things like to suit certain applications etc and heads, pin heights, flat top, dome, or dish, blah blah.... skirt length can be changed in custom aswell.

I have seen and spoke to many different workshops within Australia and we are still waiting to see a Real CP PISTON Failure...... or even a Ringset Failure that hasnt been caused by incorrect tunning (detonation)

Some of the shit I have heard scares even me sometimes with regards to what people do to engines,

Cheers BOOSTA (pete)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...