Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 533
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

full boost is in the high 3k 3600-3800 i don't know why it looks that way on the dyno sheet but its way earlier than 5k.

also for every ones interest my mod to the air box is real dam good dyno run with the box and without was the same,we took the filter out and ran it and put it back in and it was the same power.

so my gamble was 110% right.

Edited by WARLORD

Ah ok, thats interesting.

The dyno is indicating a powerband from 120-180kmh, so 1/3 of the rev range (roughly). If you were to do it basically 8200/3 = 2733, x 2 = 5466. So the sheet is saying its on power at 5500 if its revving to 8200.

Is it possible that graph is for a lighter ramp rate or something like that?

on the ecu maps its set a 9000rpm as i have just looked at the tune so i have NFI why or what id love to really tell you what i think at the moment its easier if i just pm you about things i also have haltech reviewing everything as we speak online.

yes you are correct 4820rpm full boost of 23 psi the build up is so fast that you could swear its much earlier its tuned in ve mode (volumetric efficiency tuned)which is new to me.

That's good power for 98. I'm guessing its on full pelt about 5k? When does it start to get urgent?

Edited by WARLORD

Your setup is screaming for E85 Nick, that turbo is capable of making big numbers for its size.

I think 35R size turbos and bigger are wasted on setups that run moderately low boost levels. Chasing response is not really a goal anymore and you will only get frustrated doing so.

Very nice power but I am so far fairly disappointed with the lag, feeling reasonable considering how late the turbo comes on is more of a credit to the rest of the setup in spite of as opposed to thanks to the turbo. Unless there is a setup issue responsible of course, that is definitely laggier than just would have expected!

i think its probably normal for a gtx of that size, my gtx3076 on 98 was a late turbo, 18psi at 4000rpm but probably 4400ish til the back tires broke free.

E85 and more boost helped alot, but would do on most turbo's anyway.

Edited by AngryRBGTX

Very nice power but I am so far fairly disappointed with the lag, feeling reasonable considering how late the turbo comes on is more of a credit to the rest of the setup in spite of as opposed to thanks to the turbo. Unless there is a setup issue responsible of course, that is definitely laggier than just would have expected!

disappointed nar its not that bad it really doesn't feel laggy honestly has anyone else had there car tuned on ve cos ive been in cars with lag but this feels different it could be set up.in the top end you see the torque drop of it was explained to me that its cos of the cams need to be bigger tuning in volumetric efficiency calculates the amount of air that can flow throw the engine and cos the head is ported the cams are my restriction ..............true or not i have NFI..lol thats the only set up issue that i can think of

That's odd, its on fairly late. Yet if it feels like its on much earlier I'm guessing it actually has good pull before being on boost?

its hard to explain it does not feels as it looks or sounds buy the dyno or the full boost by 4800 i need to do a vid on the car

If the efficiency of the engine drops off your VE numbers will tend to flatten out and sometimes run backwards.

That torque curve says it all. Add some more boost if you have a decent controller with rpm correction at the point where the torque curve falls over (150km/h). Power will keep climbing and torque curve will stay flatter.

Edited by Shane_954

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok interesting i guess ill wait till using a manual gauge before making assumptions.
    • Not in any way a logical conclusion. Also, looking at those logs, I struggle to see how that much oil pressure can go away that fast unless you are sucking air into the pickup. Meanwhile the ECU voltage is chucking a huge wobbly which seems to be tied to the throttle position. 100% throttle results in decreasing voltage. It's a mess.
    • So didn't get around to installing a manual oil pressure gauge and then decided to take the car for a cruisey drive to a cars and coffee and brought the laptop along with to get another log using more gears to see if its an oil pressure issue under acceleration or after. this log has 3 gears of WOT where as previous had 2 and the oil pressure dropped once on the brakes, and the same again happens here which is interesting as it shows it can hold oil pressure while under acceleration but once slowing or just the lower RPM after a pull pressure drops. I will be chucking a manual oil pressure gauge on to confirm but so far this makes me feel it is not an electrical issue. Something else i realised is the pressure sensor also is giving temperature information and the temp stays steady the whole time which makes me feel like the sensor itself is showing a true pressure reading.
    • LOL.... fk...   there goes 25K to make 200kW
    • For sure the later RB26 variants had a different setup (6 cam voltage sender?), but the RB25DE/DET share the same ECU pinout/PCB footprint, and at the ECU plug it ends up being 'throttle sensor in' & 'throttle sensor out' (to A/T TCU) ...you stick a multimeter on these pins and you'll find them directly connected (0 ohms) ; I had an pair of Nissan ECUs on the bench long ago, and I noticed this throttle sensor in/out link, actually linked to an op-amp ...which was unpopulated on the NA board, but present on the T board and I went 'ah-ha!' in some moment of clarity... ...it wouldn't surprise me if they changed strategy here though (in the software and actual monitoring of this signal), because they did with other stuff (A/T signals).. and 0.45v as a trigger point makes sense, as that's what the external TCU units expect at idle ; kudos, thanks for that insight...I suppose it boils down to whether or not Consult can display real time data of that signal's voltage... ...in any event, it presents the same target...ie; rotate TPS unit to achieve 0.45v to suit both ECU&TCU, and where do you goto from there? Just disconnect TPSwitch connector and/or that plus TPSensor connector....or do you go for the throat and disconnect IACV solenoid and see if it still stalls? (probably throws a recoverable fault code and goes for default idle strategy?)...
×
×
  • Create New...