Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

has anyone else had there car tuned on ve cos ive been in cars with lag but this feels different it could be set up.in the top end you see the torque drop of it was explained to me that its cos of the cams need to be bigger tuning in volumetric efficiency  calculates the amount of air that can flow throw the engine

Tuning in 'VE' is just a way of making it easier for the the tuner to make changes and see what is going on, so long as it is a competent tuner the end result should be the same - if any tune isn't matched to the VE patterns of the engine then the mixtures will be all over the show. So really all tuning is VE tuning, it's just sometimes more obvious than others depending on the software ;-)

  • Replies 539
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Tuning in 'VE' is just a way of making it easier for the the tuner to make changes and see what is going on, so long as it is a competent tuner the end result should be the same - if any tune isn't matched to the VE patterns of the engine then the mixtures will be all over the show. So really all tuning is VE tuning, it's just sometimes more obvious than others depending on the software ;-)

would that be a fuel AFR like bondi beach as i saw mine starts high waves up and down and at the end it at around 11.6 instead of a straight line what im use to.

If the efficiency of the engine drops off your VE numbers will tend to flatten out and sometimes run backwards.

That torque curve says it all. Add some more boost if you have a decent controller with rpm correction at the point where the torque curve falls over (150km/h). Power will keep climbing and torque curve will stay flatter.

do you think that he is pulling my leg about the cams

Edited by WARLORD
  • 2 months later...

would that be a fuel AFR like bondi beach as i saw mine starts high waves up and down and at the end it at around 11.6 instead of a straight line what im use to.

I'd be interested to see that curve - sounds a bit odd.

i have finely post a video up not the best but it gives an idea.

Looks like it goes well, hard to tell from clips but it seems on the laggy side to me though - could easily be wrong. Usually easier to tell when you can see rpm/boost. Enjoying it?

unfortunately i did not get a print out of the a/f ratio but it was as i said.lots of things are wrong,when it gets seen to ill post the report of things that are wrong.its not really enjoyable knowing it could be better after spending $1460

for eg

flats spots in the rev range

one value set up for anti lag instead of a map set at 23psi which is way to hi

boost setting set up wrong so that the car was spiking at 29psi every time

knock threshold not set up

if car stalls its hard to start

fouling plugs

+++++

so once i gets fixed im sure it will not be as laggy,im also getting a haltech wideband for the Ecu.

Edited by WARLORD

Clearly they can't tune! Going elsewhere or staying with them?

here is his map for the anti lag lunch control,

the other pics is how the map should look (it works it may not be the best but it works good)

post-26570-0-89839600-1374492566_thumb.jpg

post-26570-0-70219000-1374492634_thumb.jpg

post-26570-0-06316200-1374492694_thumb.jpg

post-26570-0-71042500-1374492912_thumb.jpg

Edited by R31Nismoid

Lets just keep the tone of the posts down in here, it's treading pretty closely to the line (and i've edited out some of the comments made thus far).

Be mindful that anything you post is only ever one side. Agree with it or not, that's how SAU is and needs to be to survive and keep the legal bills to a minimum around here

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nothing wears "the most". Different cars will always show signs in a different place. 114000 km is either nothing at all (as in, given the calendar age, nearly brand new) or it's completely unbelievable. We stopped believing numbers like that about 15 years ago. Having said that, my car is up around 270000 km and I have put bushes into some places** as many as 10 times in >25 years that I've owned it. ** FUCAs, which are different on an R32 than on a 33, so not likely to be the same issue for you. I have original ball joints all the way around. They are perfectly fine. Same with the spindle bearings in the front. Tie rod ends have all been done at least once though. Pretty much every other bush in the car has been done at least twice. Some of those in the first 100000km after I got it (which was at a genuine 23000!). Some of those bushes are now sphericals, and they are on a <cough> regular maintenance schedule, hence why my FUCAs have been rebuilt so many times. Half of those 10 in the count above would be in the last few years! 'twere I you, I would budget on replacing everything, for fun and prevention. If they really are 30 year old rubber, they will all be unpleasantly aged in one way or another. Whether that's corrosion of shells, or the rubber cracking, or sagging under the load, etc etc.
    • Tighten until it starts to get loose again, then back off 1/4 turn?
    • Do them as you'll find when you remove them they are perished/dried.    Its probably one of the best things to do as makes the car so much more responsive. Do ball joints while there too.
    • Hi All Got an R33, about 114,000km on the clock.  Handles very nice, no signs of issues.    Engine is out and i'm doing an underbody refresh, mainly painting subframe, cosmetics etc. Can't see anything physically giving play, but I'm wondering which bushes are the ones that wear the most, or the first ones that may give problems down the track? For good measure I'm thinking to fit new ones. Thanks
    • This post has OUTER tie rod torque spec - what about INNER tie rod torque spec??? Cannot find this info ANYWHERE.
×
×
  • Create New...