Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

didnt the M3's do 13's?

or was that the later/current models?

Early Ls1's such as VT - VY were like low 14s and I think the series 2 VY onwards in motor finally nailed a 13.9

Thats the LS1's though...

LS2's high 13's from factory

Being an Ex LS1 owner Id rather an M3 :D

The E36 M3 wasn't very fast. 6.0sec 0-60mph and 14.6sec 1/4 mile time. Wasn't until the next generation that the M3 became a rocket. I have no idea what the SS runs in the 1/4, but I have driven the E36 M3 and its nothing to write home about. Only a shade faster than the Viggen and cost $10k more, but thats a different argument entirely. Anyways, look up the 1/4 mile numbers on the Commodore and if its faster than 14.6sec it will beat the M3.

Side note - The M3 would whoop the Commodores ass around a proper track though.

Edited by Rabid

it all depends on what model ls1 it is.

if it was a vt or vx i'd say the m3. later models it would be close. with a good set of tyres a m3 would beat a lot of reasonably stock r33's. i saw one put down 233hp (173kw) at the wheels at a dyno day. it was stock. some old rich guy just wanted to put it on to see what it would get.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...