Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

the ethanol is good in a way, as it cleans everything in the engine as it gets passed through. Its almost as good as having water injection except its in the fuel. However because its partially made up by ethanol the fuel isnt as dense and it also burns leaner, so when being tuned it needs to be richened up abit in comparison to normal fuel. By all means you should get a little less economy from a tank because of this. However it does have a higher octane rating, so it sort of works itself out. Think of it like methanol, it burns lean and cold, thats why you need to squirt 2.2 times as much over std fuel. But the octane rating of it is astronomical.

Thats how i see how the ethanol helps, whether its right or not is beyond me.

:D

methanol octane is about 128, ethanlol is about 126. the only down side to a higher octane is that it makes it harder to ignite, that is why you can advance the timing with them.

:D

pretty much sums it up. ethenol reacts with water and moisture.. it can have some side effects.

with the amount of carbon deposits we all have in our engines its prob best u run a tank everyonce in a while..

i hope everyone changes ther fuel filter regularly..?

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

V-Power is 98 and V-Power Racing is 100 (also contains 5% ethanol). So at the very least you filled up with 98.

Shell Fuel Finder

sweet, i figured it must be like that and couldn't be bothered...er i mean find that www.shell.com site... :D

haha and what luck, i need to fill my tank tonight!! i might even drive the extra 15 minutes to surfers to try this gear out :D

V-Power is 98 and V-Power Racing is 100 (also contains 5% ethanol). So at the very least you filled up with 98.

Shell Fuel Finder

Thanks for that link SMR33, thats very helpful. :(

Interesting to see the feedback from first time users of the fuel.

At least people know where to get this fuel now.

I'm a little surprised at the price.

I visited Virginia Shell today.

approx prices - Regular Unleaded $1.14, V-Power $1.24, V-Power Racing $1.44

with 5% ethanol I would think that VP Racing shouldn't cost 30c more than regular unleaded.

Other lower octane ethanol based fuels are cheaper.

question for the fuel techs,

would BP 98 or Caltex 98 with an octane booster (ocasional use) be better than the ethanol additive?

Does anyone use octane boosters?

I'm a little surprised at the price.

I visited Virginia Shell today.

approx prices - Regular Unleaded $1.14, V-Power $1.24, V-Power Racing $1.44

with 5% ethanol I would think that VP Racing shouldn't cost 30c more than regular unleaded.

Other lower octane ethanol based fuels are cheaper.

question for the fuel techs,

would BP 98 or Caltex 98 with an octane booster (ocasional use) be better than the ethanol additive?

Does anyone use octane boosters?

I put in a octane booster at track days, no more power or anything but it does knock 15 to 20 points off the max knock that I see on the power FC

I'm a little surprised at the price.

I visited Virginia Shell today.

approx prices - Regular Unleaded $1.14, V-Power $1.24, V-Power Racing $1.44

with 5% ethanol I would think that VP Racing shouldn't cost 30c more than regular unleaded.

Other lower octane ethanol based fuels are cheaper.

question for the fuel techs,

would BP 98 or Caltex 98 with an octane booster (ocasional use) be better than the ethanol additive?

Does anyone use octane boosters?

thats what i meant

the price is set any day during the week now...it does not change with the pump price any more

bloody rip off

Just use BP98 or stick to wotever fuel yer car is tuned with. With octane boosters, only thing is that it screws up the internals of the cat, so it will melt down the internals of the cat and eventually block up the cat, and then u have to replace yer cat.

shell employee signing in

for some reason (i believe it's supply issues, if anyone noticed the 2 week dry spell a month ago) the racing pricechanges dont come through with the other fuels anymore

at the moment it's sitting at about 145, and hasn't changed for a week or more now so i'd say it's not going to change for a while until they fix their supply problems

but shrug, i just work there, i have no idea of how pricing actually works, we just get told when to change it and what to =P

nulon pro strength octane booster and bp ultimate at the correct mixture will bump your octane rating up to over 100 (around 103)

Even using the above it didn't match Shell 100 in my car, safely ran more ignition timing + another 4psi with Shell 100. I actually spoke to one of the techs at Nulon and he said 98 ron + prostrength will make a 98.9 ron mix (from memory) - the increase wasn't huge. Shell 100 is a much better brew......if they have it in stock.

Octane boosters will never be as good as a pure race fuel or 100 octane fuel. I've tested this vpower racing out on both my previous r33 gts-t and my current gtr32, and i have to admit, it runs good, especially since my gtr is tuned in Japan with much higher octane.

question for the fuel techs,

would BP 98 or Caltex 98 with an octane booster (ocasional use) be better than the ethanol additive?

Does anyone use octane boosters?

i like ethanol i think it is a great introduction.. fingers crossed we will be able to run off it more soo as fossil fuels are depleting quickly

octane booster no.. injector cleaners.. are good though

Just use BP98 or stick to wotever fuel yer car is tuned with. With octane boosters, only thing is that it screws up the internals of the cat, so it will melt down the internals of the cat and eventually block up the cat, and then u have to replace yer cat.

yes i agree, to stick with the same octane fuel as tuned.. unless ther car is constantly learning and adapts to different fuels..?

melt cat.. lol as if u would use a car.. GTR didnt have one lol.. ;) 180sx does... for now :)

Even using the above it didn't match Shell 100 in my car, safely ran more ignition timing + another 4psi with Shell 100. I actually spoke to one of the techs at Nulon and he said 98 ron + prostrength will make a 98.9 ron mix (from memory) - the increase wasn't huge. Shell 100 is a much better brew......if they have it in stock.

all i know is that my mate got a hold of an octane tester, and they were the results.

the abbility to run more ignition timing with the shell fuel is because of the ethanol. it burns colder, and less explosive. to get the same sized explosion with ethanol as normal petrol you need to use nearly twice as much. ethanol also takes more spark to ignitite. if you were to run a normal street car tuned for 98 ron fuel on pure ethanol it would run like crap. it would be majorly down on power. the ideal afr for ethanol is around 6:1, and it is much harder to ignite. you would have to advance the timing by over 10 degrees. my mate runs c16 in his drag/street car. when he is running the c16 he advances the timing by 10 degrees.

Is that the first time you have used it, did you notice a difference.

yes it was the first time i used it, i think it made some difference aye, but bcoz it was so cold either my coil packs were breaking down or my car hadnt adjusted to the colder air/fuel yet, bcoz it was breaking down up top end, but that was nothing to do with the fuel.

Edited by 85URK
  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Remove it. Certainly from the hub face. I'm not in love with leaving it on the wheel assembly surface either - but if it is common to do so, then....maybe fair enough. It's not difficult. Just time consuming. For the hub face you just need a large enough block and suitable grades of abrasive paper to get it off flat. The same would be true of the assembly face. Just more time consuming, probably needing a lot more care. It's defo going to be easier just to assemble the wheels as is, seal them up, and check them periodically to see if there's any movement or loosening of the fasteners, than it will be to remove it though.
    • Hello, I got my wheels powder coated and they've powder coated bloody everything the mating surface and hub (even told them not to lol) anyway should I leave it or remove it. (Would be very hard) I've searched a lot and lots of powder coaters don't mask the mating surface but do mask the hub surface. How bad it powder coat on the mating surface or hub? My question is what should I do?
    • Yeah, R34 with RB25DE likely has a 4AX01 box in it, which is a medium duty auto ~ with the RB25DET mill, it would've been fitted with 4AX00 (4AX13) heavy duty build (same case, different internals). An RB25DET will lunch on a medium duty 4R01 auto in pretty short order ...to give you some visual idea of differences between the 'medium' and 'heavy duty' boxes, you only have to look at the 2/4 band for comparison...it's chalk and cheese...(plus bigger high clutch, extra pinion in the planetary sets, higher oil pump output, different bearings, higher TC stall speed )... You can control them with just about any aftermarket TCU for electric-over 4-speed with TC lockup clutch (ie; the GM 4L60E and others)...I have a custom standalone TCU that includes MAP sensor (for turbo applications) along with TPS, RPM, and line pressure monitoring...in other words, I don't use any ECU signals...no real need to.
    • If you want to do the wiring, the GTT engine ecu has the same pinouts extra that the seperate TCM in the NA car has. You can literally grab the wires/pins that lead into the Seperate TCM and wire them into the corresponding pins in the GTT Engine ECU. You could then in theory Nistune it. I realised this when everyone put it in the too hard basket and I actually looked at the f**kin R34 manual. This is after I had previously had a seperate aftermarket TCM controller in my original N/A chassis car and a very built gearbox from a GTT, running a seperate Haltech engine ECU. I ran into this issue when I re-shelled the car into a GTT shell, so my aftermarket TCM was no longer plug and play, because the loom/modules were not present. I was pretty livid when realizing just how simple the original fix actually was. It sat for 3+ years at various workshops trying to find a solution. In practice none of this is a worthwhile idea for a lot of reasons, generally surrounding the shitness of the NA auto, the autos in general that come with skylines, and the NA engine and lack of gains. The gearbox is specced for the 2.5L N/A and barely at that level. If you have to pay anyone any money to do any of this, that is money spent on manualizing the car and it's not even close in terms of a comparison. Learning to drive manual is simpler than going through the pain of dealing with the N/A gearbox and he'll have fun to boot.
×
×
  • Create New...