Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

Im in the process of planning some head work and looking at the available options in the way of a 1mm oversize valve set for my RB26 head and im hoping someone can shed some light on exactly what is available and from where. Ferera, Nitto and Naprec are the only brands I have heard of, are there any others worth looking at?

Also on this subject, what other components in the head will need to be changed to facilitate the larger valves?

Thanks :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/173364-oversize-valve-selection-rb26dett/
Share on other sites

Hey dude i had my oversize valves made by manley in the US. they fabricate head components for muscle cars but they do custom orders. the valves have exelent alloy propertys and havent shown a sign of wearing, even using my 10.35mm lift cams. youll need to change the retainers, the springs, the lifters, the valve stems need to be complety reworked, and your head will need a nice port and polish job to suit the rest of the components. if you have any questions feel free to pm or mail me. ill do my best in helping you setup your head

Hi Nick

Give proengines a call he makes his own valves and gets some after market types as well check this out might explain more, http://proengines.com.au/perhead.html might help

Cheers Peter

Or talk to nas at thornleigh he did 1mm oversize valves for us, not sure of the brand of valves. Apart from the valve seat nothing else had to be changed for the valves, although we did get the head releived to clear the cams at the same time, and porting of the inlet (and a clean up on the zorst side)

  Duncan said:
Or talk to nas at thornleigh he did 1mm oversize valves for us, not sure of the brand of valves. Apart from the valve seat nothing else had to be changed for the valves, although we did get the head releived to clear the cams at the same time, and porting of the inlet (and a clean up on the zorst side)

Curious why they would port the inlet and only clean up the exhaust side, when it is common knowledge that the exhaust side is where rb's need the most work

Nick having used a few different brands over the years heres a little wrap up I have made

FERREA are far and away the best....

NAPREC are bigger being 1.5mm oversized but the trumpet angle is the same as standard, around 16 degrees, now this is far from optimal and something nissan could have done better, as the greater the angle, the more flow. They are still good though and do as well as the FERREA's in flow testing just a hassle to order them.

Haven't used Nitto or whatever, but I have used Ferrea's a few times and they are good quality at a good price and have 20 degree angle.

Manley are awesome but you can only get them in blanks, getting them to make customs for you is like having a baby, it takes a long time there is a lot of pain in the arse and crotch but you get a good result at the very end!!!

Hope this helps

I've currently got 2 heads here that I'm doing, one using 1.5mm o/s Naprec valves and one using 1mm o/s Ferreas and personally I would go for the Ferreas. They have a better finish, for example the raduising on the valve heads. The Naprec valves use a 6mm stem on both intake and exhaust which require custom exhaust guides while the Ferrea uses a 7mm exhaust stem, the same as standard so you don't require different guides or seals.

Another option is the Pep Pro valves, these are sold by Austral distributing. They are Taiwanese and are a top quality valve and a little cheaper than the others, definitely cheaper than a genuine Nissan valve. They are made by Shin Ichi which distributed in the US as SI Valves. I have used them in a lot of different engines without any failures.

After saying all that, the standard valves dont have issues. I have a head here that made over 700 RWHP with standard valves and they look like new.

  • 8 years later...
  On 19/06/2007 at 2:51 AM, Faid said:

Hey dude i had my oversize valves made by manley in the US. they fabricate head components for muscle cars but they do custom orders. the valves have exelent alloy propertys and havent shown a sign of wearing, even using my 10.35mm lift cams. youll need to change the retainers, the springs, the lifters, the valve stems need to be complety reworked, and your head will need a nice port and polish job to suit the rest of the components. if you have any questions feel free to pm or mail me. ill do my best in helping you setup your head

what exactly has to be done to the valve stems? if they needed to be modified, i would think the valve keepers would need to be as well?

  On 01/12/2015 at 1:51 AM, Tim_zenki said:

what exactly has to be done to the valve stems? if they needed to be modified, i would think the valve keepers would need to be as well?

Hey Tim,

Might be worth starting a new thread as this one is from 2007 and info is bound to be out of date now.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...