Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All

Ill give you the story:

Good mate of mine has a 33GTR with twin N1 turbo’s, cams exhaust, full rebuild etc…. got approx 260RWKW’s on a very reputable workshops dyno. This is with a standard computer on 14psi

He has just gotten his car back after having the head reco’d due to a cracked gallery?? And also got a PowerFC installed and turned. All other components are the same.

He got 203AWKW @ 12psi with this tune. This again was from a reputable workshop although not the same one as mentioned previously?

We understand that having dyno’d in 4WD compared to RWD will show loss of KW on a graph.

The question is: why would it drop approx 60KW after the head was fixed and a PowerPC has been added to the mix and tuned??

Poor tuning??

Dodgy Job??

From what my mate said the workshop owner advised that the Head was also decompressed??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/173720-33gtr-decrease-in-power-after-tune/
Share on other sites

Loss of power directly from these two items

2 psi less

AWKW

General differences

Different Dyno

Different weather conditions, different adjustments for the weather conditions

Yes it could also be a doggy head job, bad tune. Without back to back testing it's very hard to say but the first two things I listed probably contribute the most.

Hi All

Ill give you the story:

Good mate of mine has a 33GTR with twin N1 turbo’s, cams exhaust, full rebuild etc…. got approx 260RWKW’s on a very reputable workshops dyno. This is with a standard computer on 14psi

He has just gotten his car back after having the head reco’d due to a cracked gallery?? And also got a PowerFC installed and turned. All other components are the same.

He got 203AWKW @ 12psi with this tune. This again was from a reputable workshop although not the same one as mentioned previously?

We understand that having dyno’d in 4WD compared to RWD will show loss of KW on a graph.

The question is: why would it drop approx 60KW after the head was fixed and a PowerPC has been added to the mix and tuned??

Poor tuning??

Dodgy Job??

From what my mate said the workshop owner advised that the Head was also decompressed??

maybe it was running out of fuel and the tuner backed it off a little earlier in the rev range, or took a lot of timing out cause it was detonating.

There are too many factors

The questions is.....how does it feel to drive now, compared to before?

If it feels just as good or better then theres no problem

well personally it seems to be less "break ya neck" than prior then again i havent been in the car for approx 2 months and its been off the road for about 1 month.

the current dyno run with the tune was done 2 days ago at about 7pm..... nice a cool (freezing) night

the previous run was done about november 2006 from what he said the day was nice but not cold

100% agree with 2psi less and 4wd compared to rwd dyno but you would think that which a tune and fixed head it would have compensated for that??

i just confirmed with him that the tuner told him that the head had been cracked for a while and should have been picked up whilst the previous workshop had it.

November was the time cams, turbos and rebuild was done then dyno'd.

this afternoon i strongly suggested that he take it back to the shop and have them take a look but on the way there his tyre blew due to random screw.

well see what the shop says tomorrow

Power seems a little low, stock turbos you can get about 250rwkw on 14psi, N1's i'd expect a bit more with a bit more boost.... my old setup had 258rwkw and about 240awkw to give you some idea..

something isn't right.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's kind of interesting - They definitely do builds that split the difference between what they like and what will generate views and engagement. The NC Platform always surprises everyone in a good way, in an uncomfortably good way some may say. They could throw a LS in there and arguably have the best (and best performing) car of the entire stable. But that isn't necessarily what draws views, because people viewing don't want to accept the vegetables of a LS NC MX5 being a superior vehicle in every way (including fun) than a RB26 240Z. This is also why there's not a lot of content about the GR Yaris (on the web in general). They're too good, yet 'only a Yaris' The community doesn't want certain cars to be as good as they are - to beat their hero cars, and I believe the NC MX5 is absolutely one of those cars.
    • Yeah - My key still does the chime thing. I followed the procedure but it didn't activate on the (identical) third set of keyfob that I had. I vaguely remember the alarm saying you can only pair two keys with it. Now that I've dug it up, it appears that you very much can pair keyfobs to the alarm system. (which are the fobs I use to unlock the car). I have successfully diverted the thread and can probably not use the OEM keyfob ever again unless I use the aftermarket alarm and attempt to pair the OEM keyfob to it. Which might just work, or not :D. I definitely used the nissan method and not the aftermarket alarm method.
    • What makes it worse is that Nissan made keys in the same style, for example R34 and Stagea, but they work at different frequencies or something like that. So they look the same but the remotes are not interchangeable. I learned that from some guy selling aftermarket blank keys.
    • Does your door chime work when you have the key in the lock and open the door? I've had that disabled because it's f**king annoying and it is one thing that messes with the pairing. Because now the car doesn't detect key in ignition anymore and the slide-key-in-and-out sequence does not trigger the pairing mode anymore. The service manual has a section on the various bits involved in doing the syncing. I presume it'll be similar between Stagea and R34.
    • Agree, but meh, I think is is based more on LOLS than actually apples to apples, like, who would have thunk a turbo 4 cylinder would not beat a NA 4 cylinder  I think with just basic N/A mods, like a exhaust and tune, it would be equal to the Mini in its current form, maybe I know my current 2.5 would "chop the mini" as the midrange now has a night and day difference in power delivery compared to the tuned 2.0, by around 20kwatw and 30nm from around 2k rpm "ish"....... I'm kinda hoping that they do a N/A build, either with the MZR 2.0 or with whatever they decide to use If I recall correctly they did talk about K swapping one a while ago
×
×
  • Create New...