Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 2 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 3 months later...

99 R34 GTT

13.62 @ 110.37mph. 60 ft = 2.55 (1/5/2010)

Was at Calder park for the first time. No past experience and need some practice with the launches. Also running street tyres 235x17 front/back.

Have been told that i should be comfortably making 12's. Running 18-20psi boost, 263rwkw@130Kph, 1045.5NM@90Kph.

Stopped with the runs once i couldn't reverse out of the burnout..think gearbox ok as no issue driving through 1-4, 5& Reverse no go when in gear. No crunching or bad sounds. Told it could be gear selector fork bend (think i said it right). Hopefully back on track in a few weeks.

^ Thats MPH is way to low for 260rwkw.

110mph = around 220rwkw.

110mph is good for around a 12.9/12.8 in a R33 on street tyres (you'll need a 1.9 60ft)

Yeah definitely. I had too much wheel spin in the street tyres. I'll be out with semi-slicks next time which should improve 60ft and time considerably.

  • 2 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...
99 R34 GTT

13.62 @ 110.37mph. 60 ft = 2.55 (1/5/2010)

Was at Calder park for the first time. No past experience and need some practice with the launches. Also running street tyres 235x17 front/back.

Have been told that i should be comfortably making 12's. Running 18-20psi boost, 263rwkw@130Kph, 1045.5NM@90Kph.

Stopped with the runs once i couldn't reverse out of the burnout..think gearbox ok as no issue driving through 1-4, 5& Reverse no go when in gear. No crunching or bad sounds. Told it could be gear selector fork bend (think i said it right). Hopefully back on track in a few weeks.

wat?? 13.6sec??

Im going heathcote this sunday and im hoping for 13's, and im doing only 180rwkw.. lol

  • 4 weeks later...

10.24 at 144 mph and a 2.2 60 ft ongoey r32 gtr james vosilaitis

http://www.fullboost.com.au/records.php?class=10

also id like to mention that this was achieved on street tyres ,thats why the 60 ft was shit

Edited by turbo rxp
  • 3 weeks later...
14.9sec @104.14mph on a wet track at heathcote. Only get to do 3 runs.

Looking for a mid 13's this weekend. And some better tyres.

yeah you should be able to get 13 OK

i was able to do 13.7 with 105mph with a crap diff

so if you have traction and a good diff youll be fine

yeah you should be able to get 13 OK

i was able to do 13.7 with 105mph with a crap diff

so if you have traction and a good diff youll be fine

yeah cool man. Will let u guys know after the day.

Need practice too. 3 runs wasnt enough for my first time.

And being wet doesnt help either.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hows your intake piping? Are you still running stock? Having in the stock AFM position would mean, if the BOV was shut/venting out, it'd create the almost stalling kind of effect right // "the rich pulse behaviour" due to MAF thinking air is flowing ? But this would be better than having the bov in the stock position + MAF on/just before cross over piping right?
    • Essentially, yes. Although I wouldn't put the AFM on the crossover pipe. I'd want to put it into what amounts to the correct size tube, which is more easily done in the intercooler pipework. I bought a mount tube for card stile AFM that replaces the stock AFM - although being a cheap AliExpress knockoff, it had not flange and I had to make and weld my own. But it is the same length and diameter as the stock RB AFM, goes on my airbox, etc etc. I don't have a sick enough rig to warrant anything different, and the swap will take 5 minutes (when I finally get around to it and the injectors & the dyno tune).
    • So to summarise, the best thing to do is to move recirc to between turbo and IC, and maf on the crossover pipe. Meaning I'd need a recirc flange, drill a hole in the piping on turbo outlet area. And drill hole on crossover to fit/weld maf sensor? Either that or put the MAF on the turbo inlet right?  Is an aftermarket recirc/blowoff valve recommended? Do currently have family in Japan so could probably bring something back with maybe a cheeky lil SuperAutobacs run?
    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
×
×
  • Create New...