Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i c... dunno about you, but I myself wish I have an AWD car, much improved wet handling compared to RWD....

u gotta take out both the fuse and the front shaft, otherwise you might break something, like burn the transfer case.

I have installed a switch that runs inline with the 4WD fuse. I use it all the time and have seen no problem for the last year of using it.

Of course, the ignition has to be off before the use of the switch will take effect. (ie: no alternating between 4WD and RWD on 'the fly')

If you don't wish to install a switch, simply remove the 4WD fuse from in the engine bay. And no, ABS is not affected by this.

Guest Dragon

There is another 'trick' if you wish to 'try' running it in 2WD mode 'without' pulling the fuse.

Drive along the road, say about 40km/h (Make sure the turbo is cool for this) push the clutch in, coast along, switch the engine off (Must be in a straight line, clear of ALL traffic. Hit the kill switch on your turbo timer if you have one.)

Once the engine has died, switch back on and start. (Do this while still coasting along)

Let out clutch and you will be in RWD mode.

PRO's: Instant change on the fly to RWD. No need to pull fuse. Can test to see what it is like quickly in RWD mode.

CON's: Disables ABS/HIACS. ABS/HIACS lights will come on. AWD system will engage again once you stop moving forward!

How this works in this............

When you start the car (R32 GTS-4/GTR) the ATTESSA (Spelling?) system tests itself. Normally when you first start a car, it is NOT moving, soo all sensors report back that all is fine and dandy.

But, if you start the car WHILE it is rolling along, then the sensors report there is a problem! Shuts down AWD and goes into RWD mode.

If you have ABS/HIACS fitted, these also will shut down.

I have tried this on a R32 GTR and it works a treat! It 'should' work on a R32 GTS-4.

Have fun!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They care about emissions, and cost the most. Save weight where possible, and make manufacturing easier. Less material also let's the engine transfer heat to water quicker, and bring the engine up to temp quicker, better for emissions and getting them past their warranty period.
    • I was under the impression the reason why OEMs are going with solutions like relatively thin "right-sized" cylinder walls with technologies like PTWA and open deck is because they care a lot about whatever marginal knock margin benefits they get from that vs the structural rigidity benefits of a closed deck block and thicker cylinder walls. I also see some weird stuff like plastic inserts in the water jacket around the cylinders to try and equalize cylinder wall temperatures. re: the PRP blocks and heads at the end of the day it's hard to know what is and isn't going to work there, just have to see what the initial buyers say about it.
    • Which is why I didn't mention that hardness testing, and specifically mentioned the bore and deck thickness testing. Yeah, not really. The bore temperature will be a lot more even around the top half inch or so, where the material distribution is dominated by the deck, and which is the only place where the bore surface temperature heating any gas in the cylinder is likely to have any effect on detonation. Think about it. Another inch or so down the bore, you might have a hotter spot. The gas there might get a bit hotter, then the piston rises squeezes that gas away from there at high speed and mixes it with other gas from nearby. Instant dilution of the problem. I'd be surprised if it was an issue at any time other than in racing engines or OEM dev engines being run at the ragged edge of tuning. Say what now?
    • https://dsportmag.com/the-tech/education/engine-tech-material-hardness-testing/ The PRP testing on block hardness I'm not sure how much it actually can be trusted. The thinner cylinder walls on RBs is a bit of a problem vs 2JZ but it really depends on the design goal. Siamesed cylinder bores like a 2JZ cause uneven cylinder wall temps too, which means a bit of distortion induced by that + the hotspot can affect knock margin. Something that actually gives me a bit of pause with the PRP block, whether super thick cylinder walls are going to keep it from being drop-in compatible on an otherwise OEM rebuild. 
    • Yeah very valid point. I am waiting for one of the other tuners to come back from vacation so he can help me a bit when the cat is installed again. In the meantime I am going to finish up my polishing and ceramic coating that I have started myself.    N45 Dr Beasley product is highly recommended for a paint primer / polisher. Using this EXO Gtechniq also for the ceramic but next time might use the light serum before hand also. Looks great. 
×
×
  • Create New...