Jump to content
SAU Community

Sau Vs Wrx Club Drag Day Results - Times Only - Held On 23/06


Recommended Posts

Ok guys/girls,

As most of you know we recently held our drag day, for which there was trophies and prizes up for grabs for the quickest times of teh day.

Trophies will be awarded to the quickest time of the day in each class.

And prizes kindly donated by Nulon will be awarded to the quickest SAU member of the day in each class.

Prize packs consist of:- oil, coolant, octane booster, engine conditioner, plus more.

All presentations will take place at the next SAU General Meeting - on July 17.

Classes and times are as follows:

- AWD Nissan / GTR Class

Pink 33GTR (Karl) - 10.89

Scotsman (Chris) - White R33GTR - 11.84 @ 115mph

TheBuzz (Ben) - Black R32GTR - 12.1 @ 115mph

VSPEC-33 (Shane) Purple R33GTR - 12.85 @ 106.8mph

- RWD GTS-t Class

HKS-R33 (Mike) - White 33GTSt - 12.54 @ 110mph

GTS_077 (Michael) - White R31 - 13.1 @ 110mph

Jetdat - White 33GTSt - 13.33 @ 113mph

khunjeng (Chris) - Grey 33GTSt - 13.51 @ 113mph

RCHOO (Wayne) - Grey 4 door - 14.1@ 101.5mph

- WRX/Mitsubishi Class (VR4 Galants, GSR Lancer, 300GT/GTO etc)

97 rExy (Chris) - 97 Black WRX - 12.05 @ 114.5mph

ccs (Chris) - 12.61 @ 111mph

Dark (Tharaka) - VR4 - 13.1 @ 106mph

rexdan (Dan) - Blue WRX - 13.46 @ 101.72mph

Random Dude (Brenton) - Blue WRX - 13.7 @ 99mph

Nguy (Michael) - 13.08 @ 104mph

- STi/EVO Class

_Ewok_ (Ben) - Grey O5STi - 12.81 @ 106.06mph

digitalinscription (Ian) - 06 STI (Orange) - 13.79 @ 104.00mph

saffcossie (Alan) - Blue EVO - 13.84 @100.04mph

- Intruder Class

achoo (Leon) - purple Cortina - 13.0 @ 106mph

Chrisman (Scott) - Black TX5 - 14.47 @ 104.02 mph

- I have NO Class Sh1tbox Class - Gareth/Daz/other motorbikes - you guys are fighting for this one ;)

RowdyR32 (Gareth) - CBR954 - 10.77 at 132mph

deafwish (Daz) - Kawasaki Z1000 - 11.09 @126mph

Please post up your class and your best time, including a copy of your time slip. If you cant post your time slip in this thread, please email it to me at [email protected]

Please leave the chat in the other thread, this is specifically for times only.

Proudly sponsored by:

header-new.jpg

Well done to the winners!!

That Nulon Octane booster is awesome, Nulon do a lot of research on Octane Boosters and they have one of the very few effective ones on the market. A lot of Octane boosters arn't what they're cracked up to be but that one is, they've spent an absolute fortune developing the product and it's on the money!

When Motor, Wheels or any other company that tests new cars go up to the Northern Territory for the road tests on high performace vehicles they order boxes and boxes of that product from Nulon and it is very effective. It's really good for people that don't have access to 98 octane full, mix it with a tank of 92 and your almost at 100 octane. :yes:

Back on topic, Enjoy the prizes people! :P

Well done to the winners!!

That Nulon Octane booster is awesome, Nulon do a lot of research on Octane Boosters and they have one of the very few effective ones on the market. A lot of Octane boosters arn't what they're cracked up to be but that one is, they've spent an absolute fortune developing the product and it's on the money! :yes:

I wonder if anyone has compared it to the Martini Super Boost

Nulon definatley have, they've compared all their competitors products (and their own) effectiveness in an independant lab to find out who is ripping people off and who's products actually work like theirs, I'm sure Martini would be one of the effective ones.

One of their competitors octane boosters that they tested actual reduced the octane levels, which is a pretty good example of some companies developing products with no merit. That product is available in most major service stations.

Evo Class - Alan - 13.84 at 100.04mph.

Can bring time slip to the meet but currently on dial up which is killing me (thanks Ferni for reminding me about the modem in my laptop! :D )

Reminder - all trophies and prizes will be presented at the SAU Vic General Meeting on Tuesday 17 July.

Thread here - http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...howtopic=176210

If anyone still has times to submit - you have until 4pm on Monday 16 July.

Cheers

B

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...