Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...

"THEORY OF MAGNETIC POWER

POWER NEO uses a strong magnetic field from the neodymum magnets to re-arrange the gasoline molecules to be in a more structured which provides a more complete combustion. This improves the combustion efficiency, and in turn reduces the amount of unburnt gasoline and corbon monoxide in the hydrocarbon infested exhaust gas. Carbon monoxide is the main component in exhaust gas pollution. POWER NEO is able to contribute to the global warming reduction which is the biggest environmental problem today.

...

With POWER NEO, the driver will see a dramatic improvement in torque at low RPM levels. This improved torque is a result of a more explosive combustion due to a more complete fuel burn (as close as 100%). Power is improved through out the RPM range without pressing the accelerator too much. This will also improve mileage as a result of lesser fuel consumption."

http://shorterlink.com/?LJ0R0S

I had something similar in my previous car, called a Triple Charger. I was under the impression that it helped with my exhaust emissions after testing it a few months after installing but now I'm starting to think it was the better grade of oil I swapped to at the same time. It was also meant to improve power and economy.

I put it on my Skyline a couple of months ago and monitored the economy. About the only difference I noticed was that it was now harder to start, because it was mounted vertically and the fuel would drain back down the line. The fuel pump has a preset timer on it to fill the fuel filter and prime the injectors when you switch the ignition on, but with this extra reservoir installed it obviously hadn't primed the injectors yet and thus more cranking was needed.

It was hard to say if my fuel economy improved or not, because I installed it around the same time I did some mods to my car. But a couple of weeks ago I got sick of the hard starting and so took it off without doing any other mods. Voila, my fuel economy went from about 14.5L/100km to 13.8L/100km.

So I would say it and all things like it are a crock of shit :)

"Then there was the item that by late 1986 was creating considerable conflict between GM-H and the HDT, namely the 'energy polariser'.

... The HDT press release described the 'polariser' briefly as "a new development, which improves overall vehicle efficiency, ride comfort and stability." Among the claims made by Peter Brock for his invention were that it enabled a car tuned for super petrol to run ULP with no ill effects whatsoever. Such a claim is in defiance of all normal logic, but Brock insisted on the truth of it. He admitted that this was "way out thinking" but it was clear that his faith was beyond question or challenge. On the other hand, GM-H dismissed it in these terms; "as far as the energy polariser is concerned GM-H can see no technical merit in it and cannot endorse its use". Peter Brock's clash with GM-H peaked in February '87, with the announcement that the long-standing relationship with HDT and GM-H was over. "

And then from www.skeptics.com.au

"In 1982, Australian Skeptics instituted an award to be presented annually at the National Convention to individuals or organisations who made the most outrageous claim of a paranormal or pseudoscientific nature in the preceding year. ...

The next award went to an Australian sporting icon. In 1986, Peter Brock, Australia's premier touring car driver, became involved in promoting an "energy polariser" which, he alleged, when attached to the firewall of a car, improved its performance in all fields. The device was not connected to any of the vehicle systems and supposedly worked by application of mysterious "energies unknown to science". Along with motoring journals, the Skeptics conducted an investigation of the device and found that there was no basis to the claims made. The fallout from this affair saw Brock severing his relationship with General Motors, his long time sponsors and with a number of his colleagues. The publicity associated with the case saw the device withdrawn from sale."

It sounds like the fuel didn't even run through this device at all.

The polariser sat on the Commodore's dash/firewall on the inside! It wasn't a fuel catalyser at all, it was meant to affect the whole car via some mysterious energies. It was also meant to improve handling and braking.

What I want a lot more than the polariser are the drugs that Brockie was on when he thought the polariser actually did something :)

I do work with chemistry every day at uni. I dont see how you can "align" fuel molecules. Fuel is a bunch of saturated and unsaturated hyrdocarbons. They are not polar whatsoever. So to to align them using some magnet is just a joke. Try sellin this to any seasoned chemist... However the other ones that release stuff into the fuel like Tin may do somethin, but aligning fuel molecules.. haha.. I should keep quiet now :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Can you log IAT? Whilst WTA coolers have their place, doing any sort of sustained run is not one of them There are fixes that slow down the heat soak, like ice boxes, which don't last that long, and interchillers, which are fairly expensive, up grades to the WTA cooling radiator, which may require a bigger pump, and upgrades to the reservoir size,  and upgrades to the cooling fans, but, it all still heat soaks, and takes ages to come down in hot weather  For a turbo, that isn't locked into WTA like my PD blower is, can you not possibly swap to a nice air to air intercooler????, it would be better for sustained runs then, and have alot less things that could go wrong in my opinion 
    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
    • That's less offensive than the previous gen.....except for all that ugly black tupperware around the edges. Blerck!
    • I leant out the window recently and took a picture of this new WRX. It looked real damn fine in person. It's faster around a track (stock) than a (stock) GR Yaris. It's much more practical despite being heavier. It's significantly cheaper. This gen tunes really well, much better than others. .... I think they're probably a lot better than people expect.
×
×
  • Create New...