Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok, well that shut me up! I thought GTST was 50-60 tops and I know next to nothing about 35s except that I read above it's an 80L tank.

even still kms per tank is a pretty vauge measurement. give us Ls/100km or if you must Kms/L. :P

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i pulled into shell with -- -- on the display (meaning there were less than 30-40kms left in the tank)

i filled her up with 70.07 litres of optimax and paid $82 after the 4cent discount.

i reset the trip meter and computer and it read 506km till empty.I was averaging 6.8-7.5 of urban driving at the time.

The computer takes approx 60 second to recalculate so cruising at 70 clicks in a low gear will give me up to 10L -which is the best i have got yet.

The graph on the next page is also very usefull-it shows you the average consumption by day/tank/last trip (im not sure yet)

  • 2 weeks later...

My 350GT8 Sedan shows:

9.1 kms/L, which translates to: 11 Litres per 100kms with a mix of city and tollway driving, flicking over to tippy mode quite often.

On a recent trip up the coast I got something like 800kms out of one tank. Normally I'll get 550-600kms. The economy I think is acceptable. Not sparkling but with the longer range at least you don't need to fill up as many times as in an R33.

T'

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

I was getting 9.5km per litre out of a 300GT had the thing serviced and now down to 8.4km/l but I must say have been thrashing it. Filled up today and will take it easy until the next fill and see how I go. Do 500-600km a week most in city traffic. A bit of Motorway stuff but that is on and off the brakes stuff too.

When I started running 98 instead of 94 I got better fuel economy so now run solely on 98.

Now doing 9.5km per 100km even with a bt of a thrash now and then

Edited by Vargas
  • 1 year later...

[attac

hment=224494:20052009426.jpg]

Theres most likely a topic on this already, but i can't find it. What figures (Lts/100) do you achieve from your v35s...

I havent seen many 3000cc and 2500cc v's but a comparison between the three engines including the 3500cc would be good.

Also what trans do you have? Manual, 5speed or 8 speed Auto.

cheers.

Hey im a new member hear and i owen a V35 GT 6 speed manual 4 door with 71 thousnd ks on the clock and i love it .Ive owened before a r34 but faimly and being a 2 door forced me to sell it.Iv owned the V35 for around 4 months and havent had any problems with it.Its lowered with super low king springs,dark tint,full polished exhaust,and a JVC DVD player in it.I live in perth WA and the fist big long trip was down to margret river and it was great on fuel we drove from armadale down to margret river and back on a tank.I dont have a trip computer in it so im not sure what the consumption would be.

post-63076-1242890726_thumb.jpg

  • 3 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...

My V35 came from Japan with the trip computer telling me the average of the last 10 or so tanks was about 7.5km/l .... and lo and behold in the 3 tanks I have had it for I have averaged about 7.5km/l! 2003 V35 auto with 50,000km on the clock.

Whats the point of this fuel consumption thread, if people care that much about it just buy a 4 cylinder front wheel drive Toyota and get it over with.

At the end of the day, the difference between the 250GT, 300GT and 350GT will be what, $20 or $30 a fortnight, not a big deal.

And if you have to count your pennies on something like that, then you are obviously living at the edge of your means.

Even worse would be buying a 250GT when you could have the 350GT which is much better, just so you can save $20 a fortnight, haha.

Whats the point of this fuel consumption thread, if people care that much about it just buy a 4 cylinder front wheel drive Toyota and get it over with.

At the end of the day, the difference between the 250GT, 300GT and 350GT will be what, $20 or $30 a fortnight, not a big deal.

And if you have to count your pennies on something like that, then you are obviously living at the edge of your means.

Even worse would be buying a 250GT when you could have the 350GT which is much better, just so you can save $20 a fortnight, haha.

Well actually $20-$30 a fortnight is a big deal to some people - $800 a year isn't exactly peanuts.

I love my 250GT - it is exactly what I wanted and what I need - I drove two 300GTs before taking it and while the first 300GT had more grunt, I'm certainly not unhappy. The other 300GT I drove was rubbish and had about half the grunt of my 250GT, wasn't in great shape that's for sure.

Back to topic - my fuel economy has dropped sharply over the last few months. I used to get 500-550km a tank in city driving, now down to 430 - 450 consistently. I've had services, changed the O2 sensors, changed the spark plugs, put injector cleaner through it twice and I always run 98 octane fuel.. no idea what's wrong. If anyone has any ideas or pearls of wisdom please feel free to share.

My V35 came from Japan with the trip computer telling me the average of the last 10 or so tanks was about 7.5km/l .... and lo and behold in the 3 tanks I have had it for I have averaged about 7.5km/l! 2003 V35 auto with 50,000km on the clock.

same here. when i bought it...green leaf was showing 8.4km/l

i reset this and now I'm getting 7.7km/l with a lot city driving and fast acceleration off the lights.

my holden captiva is a 3.2L and does less Km/s for same amount of fuel and less power...so i'm happy with the consumption of my car.

Well actually $20-$30 a fortnight is a big deal to some people - $800 a year isn't exactly peanuts.

I love my 250GT - it is exactly what I wanted and what I need - I drove two 300GTs before taking it and while the first 300GT had more grunt, I'm certainly not unhappy. The other 300GT I drove was rubbish and had about half the grunt of my 250GT, wasn't in great shape that's for sure.

Back to topic - my fuel economy has dropped sharply over the last few months. I used to get 500-550km a tank in city driving, now down to 430 - 450 consistently. I've had services, changed the O2 sensors, changed the spark plugs, put injector cleaner through it twice and I always run 98 octane fuel.. no idea what's wrong. If anyone has any ideas or pearls of wisdom please feel free to share.

Got any large (FAT) friends that your giving lifts to lately? I had 2 large bags of dog food in my boot for 2 weeks and didn't know :P The extra 20kg makes a little difference

Got any large (FAT) friends that your giving lifts to lately? I had 2 large bags of dog food in my boot for 2 weeks and didn't know :P The extra 20kg makes a little difference

Haha no.. everything in terms of loads carried is the same. I literally haven't changed anything except the wheels.. changed from 18" back to the OEM ones.. makes a difference of 0.05km per 1km but nowhere near the drop I have seen recently.. And the tyres are better too.

Back to topic - my fuel economy has dropped sharply over the last few months. I used to get 500-550km a tank in city driving, now down to 430 - 450 consistently. I've had services, changed the O2 sensors, changed the spark plugs, put injector cleaner through it twice and I always run 98 octane fuel.. no idea what's wrong. If anyone has any ideas or pearls of wisdom please feel free to share.

Not sure if you have read this thread or not but it might be worth a look:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Di...irect+injection

Not sure if you have read this thread or not but it might be worth a look:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Di...irect+injection

Brilliant info thanks mate. Think I've had every problem described there including o2 sensors, egr temperatre sensor and the carbon deposits in the intake manifold. Might give a copy to my mechanic I think to try and stop this happening again.

  • 1 month later...

I think my driving is either quite aggressive or it's a whole load of batch fuel all over the west, or the traffic is just so bad in my area?

Car is daily driven, traffic jam everyday (no freeway), just normal Ballarat Rd route to city with traffic lights.

First fill I noted what fuel & where bought, then on 2nd fill (up to 1st click of the pump nozzle) I noted how many litres it was.

Probably one day every fortnight there is a freeway trip involved.

Here's the result. So far BP Ultimate leads just by marginal at 457km per tank.

Feel free to use the Excel template for your own use.

PS: The excel is created with Office 2007, so if you have an older version you may need to upgrade or let me know and I will try to save it in older version.

Fuel_Consumption.zip

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Not noticeably. Arguably, the catless turbo is going to work harder in a different direction, as it will spool up faster, go to higher speeds more easily. Only if it was tuned in the original condition. If it was a stock tune, using the AFM before and after the cat/dump change, then no, no retune needed. If the car is running on a MAP sensor, then it might well benefit from a retune. It might even run a little dangerously without a retune, but it could quite easily be fine.
    • We had this blend that uses 98RON + 10% Ethanol which brought it to 100RON. It's no longer available anymore unfortunately.
    • Does it make a difference in your turbo having a shorter life if you have a cat converter as it causes that back pressure versus less/no back pressure with a decat? (Not sure if this is accurate) Also slightly different question if you went from a oem cat to a decat or vice versa will it require a tune? I heard if you change the dump pipe onwards it requires a tune?
    • No. Have only gotten as far as contemplating the task of having to put in the required fairly heavy wiring and fusing to run it (along with the big alternator), and preferring not to. But otherwise, it would be nice to have a little extra freedom as to exactly where the compressor is located and free up some space around the exhaust side of the engine.
    • Following from this in a related by not closely-related sense... Because I was buying a bunch of other GKTech stuff, I got some rear subframe collars. The history that leads up to this is: 25+ years ago the car arrived into the country with stock subframe bushes. At some point shortly thereafter I added Whiteline pineapple rings, set up neutral, and it improved the rear end behaviour. Well, it is my vague memory that I was happier with it with them in. Less axle tramp on launches, generally better, etc etc. ~2012 it got a new non-HICAS subframe with new stock bushes. No pineapple rings. I reckon that ever since then I've been dissatisfied with the axle tramp. Recently I've been f**king around a lot with all aspects of the suspension. One contemplation has been to relocate the rear lower control arm front mount points (and do the other things needed to make that work) to improve longitudinal rear grip by getting rid of some of the stupid anti-squat that Nissan ladled into the R32. But.... before doing that I thought I'd put some collars in. And.... The collars are good. The rear sounds a little bit different, but there has been no significant increase in NVH coming up into the body. In terms of rear behaviour - expansion joints on long sweeping elevated freeway ramps that would sometimes cause the rear to jiggle around a bit, no longer seem to do so. It appears that jamming chunks of metal into the gaps in the rubber so they can't move much is a really good thing. And the launch behaviour and general forward traction situation seems to be greatly improved too. It's impossible to be really sure, because the tyres are completely shagged - they are freakishly willing to let go right now. But as an A-B test with the same tyres it certainly seems to grip up a lot better. Highly recommended to anyone who still has stock bushes.
×
×
  • Create New...