Jump to content
SAU Community

Who Do You Support


Adz2332
 Share

Which AFL Team  

41 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Die-hard Crows member, with a small soft spot for the Swans (12yrs in Sydney does that to you). But I'm a realist and will readily admit that we have a real chance of missing the 8 and any chance of playing finals this year.

We are 7-6 so far with games against Geelong at Skilled, Essendon and Collingwood in Melb' and the Hawks at AAMI to come, plus our form at home this season sucks badly! We will probably finish the season with 11 or 12 wins and miss out on the 8. Too many injuries at the tail end of last season and early this season, and too many players playing unfit or out of form (i.e. Roo). And to make matters worse we just lost one of our best defenders for at least 2-3wks.

Port look to be on the rise again. The next two games will be the big test, a down but not out Bulldogs and then the big one... Eagles at AAMI. Should be an awesome game!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Port look to be on the rise again. The next two games will be the big test, a down but not out Bulldogs and then the big one... Eagles at AAMI. Should be an awesome game!

i wanna go to the port v eagles game

just so i can watch power play and so i can watch Shannon Hurn play

(i went to school with him hehe)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adelaide crows!

then again i dont mind the Power.

and yes i do agree the crows are in alot of trouble atm. i fear they may miss the finals with their current poor form. the crows vs eagles game was shocking! poor skills and poor execution.

just an update: Basset is out for a minimum of 6-8 weeks..

meh... theres always next year.

Carn the crows!

>_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha! Hey Will/Daz/lads :) Yes I'm still here every now and then.

The car has been a stationary display since Mar 06. These things take time... and you know how much I love my detailing :) But not long to go now! Should, no make that WILL, be ready to go by Autosalon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Port, No Salopek No Pearce No run??? Now No White! Whos going to replace them? Bently and Boak can both go back to the SANFL. Bring back Krakouer, Mahoney, Symes and Chaplin!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...