Jump to content
SAU Community

Pissed Off

nice 28

By nice 28,
in Victoria

 Share

Recommended Posts

TurboX Mentor

TurboX

Posted
Posted

Just think of it this way...

now they have talked to you and know your name, you may be less interested in doing something silly

you you might have done if you didnt think they would know your name and address.

Maybe they did you or your 30 mates a favour....

Taso84 Mentor

Taso84

Posted
Posted (edited)
Ah pipe down they were doing thier job, your 15 and the world is against you. I wouldnt worry.

When your old enough to own a house or have possessions of any worth, you'd care that this was being done aswell.

And yes, they are allowed to ask you questions. You dont have to answer, but you must give you name and address i believe.

Well actually you dont even have to give your name and address unless your driving.

Legally the police are allowed to search you and take down details under the following circumstances.

1) They have reason to believe you are carrying an illicit substance or concealed weapon or have been involved in a crime

2) You agree to it

3) They have a warrant.

The following by themselves are not legitimate reasons:

1) "Increasing crime in the area"

2) The time is 3am and your walking on the street.

3) You are driving a defective vehicle

4) You are not of anglo ethnic origin

5) You are wearing clothes including a hoodie that are cheap, not washed, and "typical" of criminals

6) You looked at them funny

but mayb theres something your not telling us

Edited by Taso84
R31Nismoid Grand Master

R31Nismoid

Posted
Posted
Well actually you dont even have to give your name and address unless your driving.

Yes they do under circumstance.

Under circumstance Police have the right to ask you to identify yourself.

By giving your name and address, or alternatively showing ID.

GTR_STEALTH Proficient

GTR_STEALTH

Posted
Posted
Well actually you dont even have to give your name and address unless your driving.

Crimes Act 1958

Section

456AA. Requirement to give name and address

(1) A member of the police force may request a

person to state his or her name and address if the

member believes on reasonable grounds that the

person—

(a) has committed or is about to commit an

offence, whether indictable or summary; or

(b) may be able to assist in the investigation of

an indictable offence which has been

committed or is suspected of having been

committed.

(2) A member of the police force who makes a

request under sub-section (1) must inform the

person of the grounds for his or her belief in

sufficient detail to allow the person to understand

the nature of the offence or suspected offence.

Like i said in my earlier post, they would have taken ur details to help them in any future investigations. So in this case it comes under Sub-section 1 (b) and by informing you about the increased crime in the area the officer has satisfied Sub-section 2.

;)

nice 28 Proficient

nice 28

Posted
  • Author
Posted

ok so basically according to GTR STEALTH's post, they are allowed to take your details.

They would've taken mine anyway because i didn't have any id (and still dont).

Taso84 is this research or what you THINK is right, i think i know which one, and also stop assuming that there isn't something that i'm not telling you. If you're trying to imply that i am a young criminal i'm pretty sure that i wouldn't be posting on here where the police could find me through my ip address etc.

Taso84 Mentor

Taso84

Posted
Posted
ok so basically according to GTR STEALTH's post, they are allowed to take your details.

They would've taken mine anyway because i didn't have any id (and still dont).

Taso84 is this research or what you THINK is right, i think i know which one, and also stop assuming that there isn't something that i'm not telling you. If you're trying to imply that i am a young criminal i'm pretty sure that i wouldn't be posting on here where the police could find me through my ip address etc.

What GTR stealth said is true, what i was trying to iterate was that they cant ask u for no reason, like general crime, there has to be a specific offence that u could assist with the investigation.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GTSBoy
      Help Understand GTT Boost Setup

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Nah. For something like boost control I wouldn't start my design with PID. I'd go with something that originates in the fuzzy logic world and use an emergency function or similar concept. PID can and does work, but at its fundamental level it is not suited to quick action. I'd be reasonably sure that the Profecs et al all transitioned to a fuzzy algorithm back in the 90s. Keep in mind also that where and when I have previously talked about using a Profec, I'm usually talking about only doing an open loop system anyway. All this talk of PID and other algorithms only comes into play when you're talking closed loop boost control, and in the context of what the OP needs and wants, we're probably actually in the realm of open loop anyway. Closed loop boost control has always bothered me, because if you sense the process value (ie the boost measurement that you want to control) in the plenum (after the throttle), then boost control to achieve a target is only desirable at WOT. When you are not WOT, you do not want the the boost to be as high as it can be (ie 100% of target). That's why you do not have the throttle at WO. You're attempting to not go as fast as you can. If the process variable is measured upstream of the throttle (ie in an RB26 plenum, or the cold side pipework in others) then yeah, sure, run the boost controller closed loop to hit a target boost there, and then the throttle does what it is supposed to do. Just for utter clarity.... an old Profec B Spec II (or whatever it is called, and I've got one, and I never look at it, so I can't remember!) and similar might have a MAP sensor, and it might show you the actual boost in the plenum (when the MAP sensor is connected to the plenum) but it does not use that value to decide what it is doing to control the boost, except to control the gating effect (where it stops holding the gate closed on the boost ramp). It's not closed loop at all. Once the gate is released, it's just the solenoid flailing away at whatever duty cycle was configured when it was set up. I'm sure that there are many people who do not understand the above points and wonder wtf is going on.  
    • joshuaho96
      Help Understand GTT Boost Setup

      By joshuaho96 · Posted

      This has clearly gone off on quite a tangent but the suggestion was "go standalone because you probably aren't going to stop at just exhaust + a mild tune and manual boost controller", not "buy a standalone purely for a boost controller". If the scope does in fact stop creeping at an EBC then sure, buy an EVC7 or Profec or whatever else people like to run and stop there. And I have yet to see any kind of aftermarket boost control that is more complicated than a PID controller with some accounting for edge cases. Control system theory is an incredibly vast field yet somehow we always end up back at some variant of a PID controller, maybe with some work done to linearize things. I have done quite a lot, but I don't care to indulge in those pissing matches, hence posting primary sources. I deal with people quite frequently that scream and shout about how their opinion matters more because they've shipped more x or y, it doesn't change the reality of the data they're trying to disagree with. Arguing that the source material is wrong is an entirely separate point and while my experience obviously doesn't matter here I've rarely seen factory service manuals be incorrect about something. It's not some random poorly documented internal software tool that is constantly being patched to barely work. It's also not that hard to just read the Japanese and double check translations either. Especially in automotive parts most of it is loanwords anyways.
    • Duncan
      R33 disk brake size

      By Duncan · Posted

      If you are keeping the current calipers you need to keep the current disc as the spacing of the caliper determines the disc diameter. Have you trial fitted the GTS brakes fit on a GTSt hub or is this forward planning? There could be differences in caliper mount spacing, backing plate and even hub shape that could cause an issue.
    • Godzillaskizza
      R33 disk brake size

      By Godzillaskizza · Posted

      Hi there I have a r33 gts with 4 stud small brakes, I'm going to convert to 5 stud but keep the small brakes, what size rotor would I need?
    • MBS206
      Help Understand GTT Boost Setup

      By MBS206 · Posted

      First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
×
×
  • Create New...