Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

his price is fair, where the hell did u get 150 for one from? find the link/thread.. sounds like bullshit 2 me :nyaanyaa:

i just did google search n u can tell from the following link his price is well n truelly reasonable.

free bump.

HERE

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/175406-fs-nokia-8800/#findComment-3222676
Share on other sites

thanks Sexual 300

3RAR- his phone is 2years old in poor condition as mentioned in the post we arent comparing apples for apples here, mine still has 12mnths warranty and is in top nick.

FYI 88" Serious Nokia's dont come down in there recommened retail price as they are classifyed as a premium handset which hold there value better. So no point waiting for these to drop prices at the shops because it simply doesnt happen Nokia dont lower the buy price on these even when they start getting older.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/175406-fs-nokia-8800/#findComment-3224230
Share on other sites

>.< always happens searched the forums for a good pick up on an 8800 ending up opting for the sirocco at retail price >.<, as said this phone is pure class, the quality of work that goes into this phone almost puts ferrari to shame.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/175406-fs-nokia-8800/#findComment-3226450
Share on other sites

i had simalar phone, 100% brilliant. battery life bad, always charging the thing, however the scirroco is the posh end and never suffered crap battery life,

dunno where you heard that from, i sell phones dude so i know what the return rate is, they also come with 2 batterys and a desktop charger, the battery has above average talk time on it comparing to current handsets on the markeet

btw both the silver 8800 and sirucco have the same internals and battery's BLX-5

Edited by sliksilvia
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/175406-fs-nokia-8800/#findComment-3245090
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Sure! But you at least have simple numbers instead of 8.5 inches +/mm, relative to your current rims you do maths with as well, and/or compare with OEM diameter, which you also need to know/research/confirm..
    • Uniclutch install vid, RB Track edition.   Highlight reel is very drive able, not noisy but still heavy with the clutch master he has.      
    • And....if that could be true for all R34 GTTs, then it might be good. But in reality it is not really any better than my standard instruction to "go out and have a look at it yourself, and wave a tape measure around" etc etc, because as soon as you have any adjustable arms, or coilovers with smaller diameter springs, or tyres that have any bulge that goes out further than the rim, etc etc, then the simple version of the information is still potentially misleading. Plus, nothing in this is static. Everything is moving. At the rear the wheels swing inward at the top as they go up, so the clearances on the inside change as the suspension is compressed. At the front it's even worse. And then you have the difference in absolute wheel position in the arch can move around more, or less, depending on how compliant the bushes are. If, like me, you have sphericals on the front caster rods (and on the FUCAs also, but these are probably less dominant when it comes to wheel position), then your wheel will swing forward/backward under loads, as well as up/down, as well as steering angle. You end up having the simple numbers with 17 caveats/footnotes for each.
×
×
  • Create New...