Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have a 1998 semiauto r34 gtt. with intercooler, airfilter, BOV .and i drive it normally.but it just can keep going for about 280 km with a full tank.

i use #98 petrol, and fill in about 48 liters to make it full when the indicator tells me there was few petrol. is the fuel tank of gtt 50L ? i just want know a normal situation of the gtt's fuel consumption thanks a lot.

i have a 1998 semiauto r34 gtt. with intercooler, airfilter, BOV .and i drive it normally.but it just can keep going for about 280 km with a full tank.

i use #98 petrol, and fill in about 48 liters to make it full when the indicator tells me there was few petrol. is the fuel tank of gtt 50L ? i just want know a normal situation of the gtt's fuel consumption thanks a lot.

Hey Dude I have a R34 GTT tiptronic auto Hybrid fmic, full exhaust from turb back,Greedy ebc, Safc2,BOV, POD, and my car gets 300 km to a full 50 lt tank it sucks what is wrong ????????????????? :thumbsup:

Edited by YPLAY4
i have a 1998 semiauto r34 gtt. with intercooler, airfilter, BOV .and i drive it normally.but it just can keep going for about 280 km with a full tank.

i use #98 petrol, and fill in about 48 liters to make it full when the indicator tells me there was few petrol. is the fuel tank of gtt 50L ? i just want know a normal situation of the gtt's fuel consumption thanks a lot.

its all in how u drive the car keep it off boost and u will do fine. i have a r32 gtst with fmic dump pipie full exhaust stock cat uped boost pod filter. and i get 450 to 500 normaly but when i give it some i get bout 300 to 350 and thats not even on empty.

GTT tank is 65L. If you used 48L to top up then you have approximately another 17L left. 280kms to 48L is still pretty rich. I just filled up my tank today with 47L after having done 360kms.

The usual culprits are O2 sensor, spark plugs, AFM...perhaps take it for a tune and service.

NISMO is right, the tank is about 65L. I'll normally get about 400kms region to a full tank. I don't run it till the lights come out though. Got a 3" turbo back, fmic, pod, ssqv, boost at 12psi, foot is a little heavy at times :nyaanyaa:. Really depends on how you drive.

changing the o2 sensor will help, changed mine and i went from 300km a tank to about 430km tank.

This sounds more like it. I have a s2 stagea (r34 engine, gearbox), which is quite a bit heavier than a skyine and on 48L my car will get over 400km around town. Its got 160awkw too so its not stock either.

My guess is that you should at least be getting more than 350km on this amount of fuel, modified or not. If its doing less than that, you need to either adjust your driving style or look for whats causing the problem - eg. check your O2 sensor. :D

A good free-flowing exhaust, SAFC or similar, and improved ignition timing will help your fuel economy as well, not to mention a bigger turbo (off boost while cruising). :D

As others have previously mentioned, the fuel capacity is 65L so try pumping it as much as possible. Reducing the use of boost should help acheive more k's. If not u better get it checked out.

my 2c worth

the following could be causing it too

Dirty air filter - causing the motor to work harder than it needs to , cause its not getting the airflow it needs

Slightly too thick oil - are you using the correct grade of oil in it ? I mistakingly used some stuff that was too thick in another car I had - and I did notice a drop in economy

change the o2 sensor as previously advised

have you ever had the car on a dyno? the dyno readout of AFR can definately tell you a LOT about what your motor is doing. I think if you were chasing the most kays per tank .. an after market ecu or a few add in mods like a SAFC and a SITC ( I think thats the one that controls engine timing )

if you got the above fitted . and spent some time and money on a dyno tune.. you would probably get more power and use less fuel. dont forget if a motor is running really really rich .. then its safe.. but .. its just pissing fuel out the tail pipe , leaning the mix to a leaner (yet still safe ) will yeild more power and less fuel consumption - but dont fall into the trap though of getting a bit more power and driving like a maniac - cause of course your goign to use more fuel

good luck matey!

if you can afford it run with a good fuel like BP ultimate 98 - just less chance of it pinging/detonating if you push it hard.

Oh and .. have a look around .. because you can find " equivalent " o2 sensors that are usually less expensive. To be honest I am not 100% certain if the equivalent o2 sensor will be " just as good" as a geniune one. But its worth a go.

Make sure you get some good crimp connectors to join it up , as my previous experience with this proved that the wires they use on o2 sensors are impossible to solder ( I think they are stainless? )

thanks everyone .now i think i catch the key point.

another question : which grade of petrol should the gtt fill? #98?

thanks everyone .now i think i catch the key point.

another question : which grade of petrol should the gtt fill? #98?

As this had been covered many many times, anything just 98 Octane will be just fine. Be it BP Ultimate, Caltex Vortex 98, Shell V-Power, V-power Racing, Mobil Synergy, they are all fine. Just a personal preference on which 'BRAND' one prefer.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 😃
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
    • You talking about the ones in the photo above? I guess that could make sense. Fixed (but flexible) line from the point up above down to the hubcap thingo, with a rotating air seal thingo. Then fixed (but also still likely flexible) line from the "other side" of the transfer in the hub cap thingo up to the valve stem on the rim. A horrible cludge, but something that could be done. I'd bet on the Unimog version being fed through from the back, as part of the axle assembly, without the need for the vulnerable lines out to the sides. It's amazing what you can do when you have an idea that is not quite impossible. Nearly impossible, but not quite.
×
×
  • Create New...