Jump to content
SAU Community

SAU Caps & Beanies... just made a deal, any1 want one?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 246
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

LOOKS GREAT THE WAY IT IS!

No gtr symbol please, it would look a bit "try-hard-ish"

Why not put the R33 skyline symbols as it is the middle model between the 32 and 34. :(

j/k

But serious about the GTR thing

Still one of each for me, thanks!

guys just a quick late notice question before the samples arrive... this is another alternate design we could have...

cap_final_5.jpg

what do you guys reckon??

why not have to tail lights at the back... like a car ....... either gtr or whatever ... get orders for gtr or standard lights....then have the SAU symbol between them like a number plate... and on the front the skyline S emblem... then skyline australia on both sides at the bottom...

just a suggestion.

Originally posted by nismoR34

Perhaps a redesign of that using the S as part of SAU like the GTR symbol?

S

AU

I did one of them before, but people didn't warm to the idea, so it was relegated to a lil symbol on the back.

here's the one I did before:

cap3.jpg

cap2.jpg

I think I'll jus get them to do a sample run of this design:

cap_final_2.jpg

cap_final_1.jpg

... R33NismoGirl ... GTR lights and standard lights are the same...

poeple didn't want sumfin on both sides, although personally I'd like the lights at the back as well instead of the front. I'd rather have the skyline logo with SAU underneath it. I'll see if I can make a version of that as well just so I can explain it better.

Originally posted by funkymonkey

I did one of them before, but people didn't warm to the idea, so it was relegated to a lil symbol on the back.

nah I meant to try it with the badge S below but doesnt matter, i was just curious to see what it would look like with the badge-type S.

cap_final_5.jpg

I wanted one about 6 pages ago...... Please just decide and say decision is final.

Make sure you get all the money up front before you place the order with the hat place or you'll have to pay.... James knows all about it :D

PS: I still want some too :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Big single, and seqy. #sorted
    • The R32 suffers from an instrument binnacle that is uncomfortably close to the design of a VN Commodore's. But beyond that, the layout of the rest of everything, and the materials (ie the vinyl coverings on dash, armrest, etc) are acceptable, and the patterns on the fabrics are not as blergh as those in the R33. And R33 seats are....quite unattractive. I know it's only small details there, but I reckon the R33 got worse than the 32. But the big blergh is the overall shape of the dash on the R33. It's just has that whole Maxima/Pulsar sort of look to it. Nothing special at all. Generic Nissan sedan. Whereas, at least the R32 dash/binnacle was different. Less a wide expanse of boringly curved plastic. More a "cockpit" sort of look, even if nowhere near to the degree that the A90 Supras got. R34 seats look good on their own, until you realise that they are indistinguishable from the shape and fabric on 70 other Japanese cars. And the foam bolsters on them suffer even worse than the earlier cars. Other than that I don't really have an opinion the rest of the R34 interior. I took the bits of the R34 I wanted (brakes and engine) and added them to the best external appearance Skyline in the modern era (the 32). So nyerr!
    • Can I be your first customer? I would like hard lines done for the fuel system, 8AN up and 8AN back and the underside wire wheeled and coated (brush or sprayed) with that black tar shit.
    • Speak for yourself, I love the R33 interior. 32 is blergh. I like the 34 interior too. Then you start getting much newer in most cars and they all turn back to blergh. 馃槢
    • 500-600hp into a RB is already 'sinking endless amounts of money' into an engine. Especially a 30 year old engine. Unfortunately this is the RB Game. Considering stock power (or at least stock components) will do ~360whp on 98 by simply turning up the boost on the stock gear on a RB26, that would be where I'd say the cutoff point for "sinking endless amounts of money into the engine" Cause to even do this reliably you'd probably need to replace all the bits anyway cause they're old, starting your sinking journey anyway. I reckon the least painful way is rebuilding the engine to make 50hp over stock lol. The 'plan your ownership around a rebuild' was a common saying 15 years ago.
  • Create New...