Jump to content
SAU Community

Piston Selection (need Compression Help)

Careless

By Careless,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

Careless Contributor

Careless

Posted
Posted

Hi everyone.

I have a fellow board member who wants to sell me some custom wiseco forgies, with wrist pins and rings and locks.

87mm

1.260 compression height

.165 dome rise

16cc dome volume

what i've been told is that I can get 11:1 compression by decking the block to get the piston out of the bore by 0.01 inches, get a 1.2 mm (0.47) headgasket, and shave the head to achieve 60cc's or whatever is required to get 11:1. they are for RB25/30 combo, but I'm using an RB26 head.

is this a good idea. by that, i mean, is using the headgasket area an ideal way of building up the quench, or should it ideally be built up using the block and piston at 0 over or under the deck?

does anyone know if the valve clearances will be an issue with 8.7mm cams? Also, what if i want to go higher at one point? will i be able to, if increase the lift (after making the head compatible with the longer/higher cams), and still not hit the pistons?

they are originally to obtain a 9.3:1 CR, so I think they will be pretty close to what I need. But then again, wiseco measured up their RB26 head at 66cc. So It's possible that by putting this into a head with lets say.... 64cc, i'd have closer to 9.8 or something to start with.

I've posted a picture.

The reason I ask is that I'm getting this set (brand new) for half the price of a custom set from a distributor, and it's also free shipping too.

my machinist wants to know if they will be compatible with this setup before i buy it, but I think it is, and i have a feeling he's gonna say no.

(im also posting this in both the n/a and engine forums, because there is no "general engine" forum ,and i'd like both turbo and n/a enthusiasts to be able to view this and help me out. Thanks :P )

post-29116-1184375460_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Adriano Grand Master

Adriano

Posted
Posted

Sorry, piston height should be close, i would deck it so the pistons sit 10thou(.25mm) proud, and then use a 1mm head gasket, then deck the head for correct comp.(check all the measurements includding ccing the pistons and head before you machine anything)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Careless Contributor

Careless

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
Sorry, piston height should be close, i would deck it so the pistons sit 10thou(.25mm) proud, and then use a 1mm head gasket, then deck the head for correct comp.(check all the measurements includding ccing the pistons and head before you machine anything)

Always coming through adriano. how do i send you a 24 of Toronto's own beer :blink:

1 thou proud is over the deck, correct? with a 1.2mm gasket, that would mean i could get .46 quench area, correct?

I guess I should shoot for .36?

what's everyone's thoughts on quench with the RB head, some engines require different quench is what I hear, depending on combustion chamber design.

is decking the head a smidgen usually a good thing?

the pistons are 16cc dome. however, wiseco states that the RB26 head is 66cc. I don't think that's correct, therefore, I've already got a leg up on the compression, being that usually heads are 64cc and thereabouts.

I think their combustion chamber was polished.

Edited by Careless
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Adriano Grand Master

Adriano

Posted
Posted
Always coming through adriano. how do i send you a 24 of Toronto's own beer :blink:

1 thou proud is over the deck, correct? with a 1.2mm gasket, that would mean i could get .46 quench area, correct?

I guess I should shoot for .36?

what's everyone's thoughts on quench with the RB head, some engines require different quench is what I hear, depending on combustion chamber design.

is decking the head a smidgen usually a good thing?

the pistons are 16cc dome, btw.

Expres post of course!LOL, i would try to get 30 thou. The smaller you can run without hitting, the better. If the pistons sit 10 thou proud over the deck, and you run a 40thou(1mm)gasket then you end up with 30 thou. You may have to machine the dome of those pistons down a little, as a rough calc gives it 12.1:1 comp, but you should bore and hone the block, then dummy assemble the bottom end. Then do all the measurements, and figure out what needs to be decked how much, then your home and hosed. Just remember whenever you build an engine like this, treat it as a custom job and dont rely on anything written on the part boxes, as a small difference here can make a huge difference in compression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Careless Contributor

Careless

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Expres post of course!LOL, i would try to get 30 thou. The smaller you can run without hitting, the better. If the pistons sit 10 thou proud over the deck, and you run a 40thou(1mm)gasket then you end up with 30 thou. You may have to machine the dome of those pistons down a little, as a rough calc gives it 12.1:1 comp, but you should bore and hone the block, then dummy assemble the bottom end. Then do all the measurements, and figure out what needs to be decked how much, then your home and hosed. Just remember whenever you build an engine like this, treat it as a custom job and dont rely on anything written on the part boxes, as a small difference here can make a huge difference in compression.

awesome.

My only beef with the pistons is that the dome height and the dome volume attribute to their weight, sitting at 411 grams per.

I might get them machined out to lighten them to 350 grams if possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Adriano Grand Master

Adriano

Posted
Posted
awesome.

My only beef with the pistons is that the dome height and the dome volume attribute to their weight, sitting at 411 grams per.

I might get them machined out to lighten them to 350 grams if possible.

Are you able to check the dome[crown thickness before you buy them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Careless Contributor

Careless

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Are you able to check the dome[crown thickness before you buy them?

well. the pistons are 1200 dollars new.

i'm getting them for 600, still new, but not useful to the current owner.

therefore, whether they are heavy or not, I bought them because it's a steal of a deal.

sure it's a little heavy for N/A, but whatever.

I'm sure they've got a deep crown, and that they can be machined quite a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stealth-Z Rookie

Stealth-Z

Posted
Posted
Are you able to check the dome[crown thickness before you buy them?

I have a set of these and emailed Wiseco about shaving the dome. This was the reply.

If there is milling inside of the dome to hollow it out, I would say no.

If it looks to be a solid dome, then yes. Minimum thickness for any part of the

crown would be .150".

Best Regards,

Wiseco Piston Co. Inc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • MBS206
      Skid pans in/around Sydney?

      By MBS206 · Posted

      Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • MBS206
      Skid pans in/around Sydney?

      By MBS206 · Posted

      Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • GTSBoy
      PRP RB26 cast block + head prototype running

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • V35_Paul
      Thinking of getting a Q50 300hp and just tuning it instead of getting the Q50 Red or 400R

      By V35_Paul · Posted

    • joshuaho96
      PRP RB26 cast block + head prototype running

      By joshuaho96 · Posted

      Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
×
×
  • Create New...