Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I got my disks machined yesterday due to some vibration caused by some grooves worn into one disk.

Apart from the grooves on one of the disks they were in perfect condition without any shudder etc, and only a few months old.

They machined 0.75mm off one disk, and 0.77mm off the other disk. Since they have 2mm of life this means they have machined off approx 40% of the usable disk.

When you get your disks machined for whatever reason, what is the average amount of material machined off? Is this normal or am i justified in being really pissed off?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/176881-brake-disk-machining/
Share on other sites

the will machine off whatever is the minimum in order to get a nice true surface. if your grooves were say .35mm thick (which is bugger all) then they would need to machine off double that.

the will machine off whatever is the minimum in order to get a nice true surface. if your grooves were say .35mm thick (which is bugger all) then they would need to machine off double that.

Yes of course they do, that is not what i want to know.

To be more specific, assuming there was no visible grooves, just the usual shudder that develops, how much is generally shaved off? And say you have to shave off 0.2mm off one side but only 0.1mm off the other side, would you just shave 0.2mm off each side to make the rotors even thickness, or shave off the minimum off each side and leave the rotors slightly different thicknesses?

Grooves don't cause a shudder by themselves.

It's most likely they had a bit of run out due to warping.

I had a pair of discs machined the other day that looked perfect but caused a shudder.

I lost 1mm thickness to clean up the run out but now the brakes pedal is smooth again.

Yes of course they do, that is not what i want to know.

To be more specific, assuming there was no visible grooves, just the usual shudder that develops, how much is generally shaved off? And say you have to shave off 0.2mm off one side but only 0.1mm off the other side, would you just shave 0.2mm off each side to make the rotors even thickness, or shave off the minimum off each side and leave the rotors slightly different thicknesses?

Hang on your first post said that you had grooves in your disks causing vibration hence why they were machined in the first place but that would generally be caused by warping as well...

If thats the case then they will generally machine each disk to the same drop so that you not only get even wear but also lifetime out of the set and not having to replace 1 or 2 at different times.

Did you talk to your mechanic before/after you picked them up and question why they were machined to the levels they were and also what tolerance would be left???

You can be lucky sometimes and have them machined exceeding the minimum thickness but its not really recommended and most places would probably refuse to do so.

If your brakes are set up correctly then you shouldn't have to worry about the rotor for a while so chances are your not even going to own the car by the time they have to be machined again due to wear and tear anyhow :domokun:

Hang on your first post said that you had grooves in your disks causing vibration hence why they were machined in the first place but that would generally be caused by warping as well...

If thats the case then they will generally machine each disk to the same drop so that you not only get even wear but also lifetime out of the set and not having to replace 1 or 2 at different times.

Did you talk to your mechanic before/after you picked them up and question why they were machined to the levels they were and also what tolerance would be left???

You can be lucky sometimes and have them machined exceeding the minimum thickness but its not really recommended and most places would probably refuse to do so.

If your brakes are set up correctly then you shouldn't have to worry about the rotor for a while so chances are your not even going to own the car by the time they have to be machined again due to wear and tear anyhow :domokun:

I should probably explain a bit more, they vibration is definitely only cause by the grooves, and not because the disk was warped/runout whatever.. The disks are only a few months old, while i was driving a few weeks ago the pad material tore off the backing plate after which the backing plate came in contact with the disk and created the grooves. As soon as it happened i stopped the car and got it towed home.

Before that incident, the disks were absolutely perfect, no vibration whatsoever, and as i said, nearly brand new.

When i dropped the disks off one was 29.95mm and the other which had the grooves was 29.74 as measured in the grooved area. When i picked them up the good one was 29.18 and the grooved one was 28.99.

So not only did they machine slightly more off the one that was perfect, they are different thicknesses. It seems they just picked approx 0.75mm out of their arse and decided to chop that much off both without any thought.

I specifically told them when i dropped them what happened, and made sure they understood that they should only take the absolute minimum off. When i picked them up i expressed my concerns on why so much had been taken off and they just like well thats how much was required which seems to me complete BS.

I notice the degradation in braking performance as the disk thins out and i go through brakes reasonably quick anyway so it is a concern for me ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I recently did this to my R33 with the full set from Car Mats Direct, they can't do the vinyl anymore that's advertised on the website due to a supplier issue so I ended up with the Black Loop Pile which looks great. I went all out with rubber sound deadening sheets from Repco and also added the sound deadening foam layer option with the carpet. Makes a world of difference and got rid of all the weird smells in the 29 year old interior. It was a bit of work but I'd 100% recommend it, Car Mats Direct had awesome customer service and quick postage. Replaced my seats with some sporty ones from Autotechnia while I was at it, feels like a new car.
    • Got the motor out and torn down. I'll be dropping off the block Monday. Luckily the scoring on Cyl6 is much less pronounced then the pictures made it out to seem. It can barely be felt. If you pass your finger over it 10x you'll barely notice it. Hopefully by some chance it will only require a honing. I'm not in the mood to buy one size larger pistons or another block. Oddly enough my 6th cylinder with the scoring has extremely clean intake valves compared to my other 5 cylinders. I'm worried the scoring was caused by too much fuel or Water/Methanol washing the cylinder. I'll review some old logs to confirm.  This was also the first time I pull an engine with the transmission still attached. It went much better then expected. I was worried my CD009 wouldn't make it easy due to its sheer size but it was much easier this way. 
    • From the pictures I have when doing the job the flywheel is the same diameter, I don't think they're playing weird tricks like putting weights at the outer diameter to increase flywheel inertia or anything like that. The OEM flywheel is definitely heavier, but it's not a huge difference. Quoted weight savings of the clutch is 2 kg so I can't imagine the flywheel being lighter than ~7 kg. Kind of regret not weighing it before the clutch went into the car but as far as driveability goes I have no complaints.
    • HKS trigger kit should be very easy to integrate with a Link. It's a 36-2 crank trigger. Hard part is finding the motivation to take off the timing belt and everything on the front of the engine to install it. You also need to cut out a hole in the oil pump housing so the sensor can read the trigger wheel. Changing out the cam sensor for a 24 tooth setup is probably good enough but as others have mentioned depending on what underlying assumptions are changed it becomes more of a problem. Reading the crank state off of the cam is an abstraction that works in the general case, but if you have an edge case it makes less and less sense. There is a GTX2860 gen 2 that can take a compact 5 bolt housing so it's direct bolt on but I'm not 100% sure of what's involved. Peak compressor efficiency drops off a bit on these turbos vs -5s, 77% vs 73% but you get way, way wider region of operation. The -5s have a really strange surge line in their compressor map that is all over the place. If you think the hot side on the -5s aren't open enough you can try the Tomei T550B turbos which a local tuner seems to be happy with:
    • i need a complete tail light for my R33 GTR if you have please let me know.
×
×
  • Create New...