Jump to content
SAU Community

Show Me Your Racing Machines


Recommended Posts

Just posted a Vid (Spicers cup) Its Sportscar Steves just learning but winning Races already, V8 Supercars Run with him and he is beating them now.

He hit the wall in race 2 ,Will put that race up soon. We have 4 weeks to get it finished.

That's awesome!

Did you guys make that front end, or is it a off the shelf mould?

How far back has the engine been moved?

Toy: SR20 is best :down:

Ahhhh, a good old R20 vs RB20 discussion... I thought these were reserved for NS.com!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ah NS, so many amusing threads.

nothing against rb20's in general but i'm still stumped as to why people remove a perfectly good sr to chuck in an extra 100kgs over the nose with the same sort of power and all the cooling, installation and wiring issues that go with it....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

go the RB20. it sounds like a sweet trumpeter under your bonnet. SR20 sounds like someone ripped an engine from the closest tractor. the sound alone is almost reason enough to love the RB20! having said that I wouldn't be chucking the SR20 out of my silvia in a hurry either. good power and torque, just sound like rubbish and they do like to break.

in fact, troy knows one day my track car will be an R32 GTST with 2.2L SR20. or maybe try a 2.4L RB20. but I reckon a nicely built 2.2 SR20 with a good sized turbo (around 3037) in a GTST would be a nice thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Driving each others cars back from PI it was sad to get back in my car. The SR20 is better on the street , no doubt! Bit when driven in anger at the track i would say the RB20 does just fine. Yes, you should buy that GTSt, the exchange rate is going your way

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both are good engines in their own right, and are pretty damn tough too (RB would pip the SR at this, but the SR is plenty tough in stock form IMO), I just wouldn't put that weight over the front of an S chassis. I was going to go RB26 for a while there, but decided against it for that reason. That RB25 180 above makes me think perhaps I should have! Though it looks to have the engine placed further back and lower which I'm sure has a lot to do with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree.... I personally wouldn't put an RB in an S chassis either. And I also think the SR is a great engine, i hear of all these stories of inherent weaknesses, but I'm yet to see it with my own eyes..... sure I believe it's possible in a super-highly tuned SR, but for most applications, they do just fine.

To my ears, an Rb20 is music, I can't get enough :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Driving each others cars back from PI it was sad to get back in my car. The SR20 is better on the street , no doubt! Bit when driven in anger at the track i would say the RB20 does just fine. Yes, you should buy that GTSt, the exchange rate is going your way

well driving your car on the street you are right. in any kind of traffic or low speed limit zones you never really get a chance to get it right up onto boost with the gate open so you always feel like you're getting half screwed and let go every time you shift up at 4,500 or so. the only way around that is drive like a loon and revs the nuts off it in 1st and 2nd everywhere but that wont win you any friends. and it feels like it is breathless under about 4,500. but mate, once the road clears and the speed limit goes up you get it up in the fun zone and it's awesome. it's the perfect car to 'cruise' on the street. and then thrash it on the track. and even if it's not quick low down it sounds amazing. on the street a good sounding car is enough to keep me happy, cause a car with lots of torque just gets you in trouble as they are still quick at 'street rpm'.

the grass is always greener. i would trade you my silvia for your 32 any day, but with how serious your 32 is now that would just be an insult to you.... having said that put a TD06 on the silvia and a few other little bits and it would be a closer fight. :)

man I still want to buy that 32. every month or so I remind tets I want it, but he is still not selling. the owner practically never drives it anymore which is sad as it is apparently a very nicely sorted car. it's my dream package. prime garage built 2.2 SR20, from memory it was a 3037 or 2835 with external gate, all the other good gear engine wise, motec ECU, lots of good stuff. then we could really play :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree.... I personally wouldn't put an RB in an S chassis either. And I also think the SR is a great engine, i hear of all these stories of inherent weaknesses, but I'm yet to see it with my own eyes..... sure I believe it's possible in a super-highly tuned SR, but for most applications, they do just fine.

To my ears, an Rb20 is music, I can't get enough :)

I think yours is a testament to the might of the RB20, 5 days of abuse, many a track day.. all on a stock wrecker motor...

and the noise? about 20+ vids on youtube attest to the the sweet XXX rated sound of a 20 on song!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree.... I personally wouldn't put an RB in an S chassis either. And I also think the SR is a great engine, i hear of all these stories of inherent weaknesses, but I'm yet to see it with my own eyes..... sure I believe it's possible in a super-highly tuned SR, but for most applications, they do just fine.

To my ears, an Rb20 is music, I can't get enough

Definitely, your car sounds very sweet!

My stock 1991 SR came out of my car having run 240rwkw's for 3 years, with 4 track days, and maybe 3 or 4 DECA days, as well as drifting etc and tested within 2psi across all cylinders and never broke anything :)

Richard: That 32 sounds a treat mate! I've always had a hankering for an SR powered 32 as well...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really think engine longevity is more to do with the original condition when you start, combined with good tuning, good servicing, temperature management and a little bit of mechanical sympathy.

My stock bottom end rb25 copped a flogging, did about 10 track days and many skidpans with between 260 and 288rwkw, got revved to 7400 and rarely saw less than 1.3bar. As with phunky's sr it was compression tested before removal from the car and was within 3psi across all cylinders.

I plan on further testing my theory by sticking a 3071 on the side of a low km s15 sr20 and stuffing some boost into it with the intention of around 260-270rwkw. We'll see if the engine dies before the box breaks :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There isnt enough to justify a build thread :thumbsup: Troy hits tyres at Sandown...two years later when i got sick of looking at dent car goes to panel beater. Car sits at panel beaters while i work OS :D Pretty sad really :)

So hopefully will be back in Aus in November at which time i hope to be able to put fuel in and go! But still std RB20 etc etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I donno, i still rekon you are cooking up something mate :)

New suspension, brakes, wider rims, ti exaust, your turbo is for sale etc

Keep the ace up the sleeve tho hehe

You actually read something i posted ? :thumbsup: Shame on you :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a little pic of the silvia with it's new 3 point tomei brace. the dumb thing is I actually did have a strut brace. :D lol I forgot it was there. it was one that tucks up near the back of the engine, and it's actually a nice one. a mines alloy one of all things. it's pretty cool and weighs absolutely nothing and would have cost a pretty penny. so if anyone with an S13 needs a strut brace give me a yell!

s131h.jpg

and a pic of the silvia with my RX7. took this as a bit of a farewell pic as the RX7 is going to it's new home shortly. :D

it's funny. I've been driving the RX7 a lot lately and it feels very nimble and quite powerful...until I drove the silvia again. being a 88 model it's light as hell, (around 1200kg) and has 230rwkw and lots of suspension gear. next to the RX7 it feels like a V8 powered go-kart! when I got back in the RX7 afterwards it felt like a luxo barge. and that's saying something as it's actually a pretty raw car to drive.

s132.jpg

s133.jpg

s134.jpg

anyway the main news is the silvia is back baby! and I'm loving it. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought the problem with doing this is the engine needs more timing and therefore is actually less efficient? Modern engines need very little timing to get to MBT, those super sharp edges on the squish pads are probably not the right way to get there but doing away with it entirely doesn't sound right either.
    • this explains the possibility of several maps with different boost levels
    • ok, I understand much better how we can control the boost and increase the number of psi before opening the wastegate
    • Well.... yes and perhaps no. It depends on what you mean by "spool". For most of us, the point that we would describe as where the turbo is "spooling" is the point where the wheel speed gets high enough for it to start making some boost. This is coincidentally around about the point where it starts making noise - hence the "spooling" sound. If that is what you mean, then no - the wastegate should still be shut at this point. The boost will still be way below the point where it should start opening. If, on the other hand, you mean "spool" as "reach full boost", then yes. At the point where the boost has reached target, then boost control has already started. The wastegate is already open, and has been for some time. Some short time, definitely, but still, some time. If you have no boost controller - just the wastegate actuator connected to the boost source, then you have a mechanical system working as a pressure balance. There is pressure on one side of the wastegate actuator's diaphragm from the spring, and pressure on the other side coming from the boost measurement location (the "source"). This is not a digital thing. The wastegate does not stay shut until the boost pressure reaches the spring "pressure". The spring will start to compress as soon as you start to apply any pressure onto it. This can be controlled somewhat by adding pre-load into the spring, but you cannot add enough preload to make it into a digital switch behaviour. The wastegate will crack open and start to leak exhaust out (and therefore not though the turbine) well before you reach the target boost pressure. Electronic (and some mechanical/pneumatic) boost controllers will act to prevent the boost source applying pressure to the actuator until just before you reach target boost, thus preventing the wastegate from creeping open. And some boost controllers will apply boost pressure on the spring side to further push it shut. And this can be be necessary because the exhaust pressure in the manifold also pushes on the wastegate valve and tries to open it and you cab get it leaking even without it being connected to the boost source.
    • A stand alone boost controller will not give you the control you need, unlike a modern ECU. Your boost will always naturally target the wastegate's opening pressure first, your controller then will allow you to add more boost as required.
×
×
  • Create New...