Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 154
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If your car sees no track or hard driving, would it be ok to run Motul 300 V or Redline for 10,000 KMs between oil changes?

Atm I run Castrol Edge Sport 5w-30, Nissan oil filter and I chang the oil every 7000 kms. I dont go to the track and do not thrash my car.

Nissan service manual says 10 000ks. People only change it at 5000 ks, for various reasons. e.g. some people do trackdays and the oil gets burnt. Others run really rich and the oil gets diluted. Some people have too much money to spend.

PS: just because oil is black doens't mean its not lubricating anymore - it means that it is picking up dirt, which it is supposed to do!

Nissan service manual says 10 000ks. People only change it at 5000 ks, for various reasons. e.g. some people do trackdays and the oil gets burnt. Others run really rich and the oil gets diluted. Some people have too much money to spend.

PS: just because oil is black doens't mean its not lubricating anymore - it means that it is picking up dirt, which it is supposed to do!

So my Castrol Edge should be doing a good job then :laugh:

This is the answer i have gotten from every user of this oil. Thanks for the info I think from now on this is the only oil i will get for my car.

i have used nothing but motul chrono 300v for about 3 years now. I also use nismo, or greddy filters (also used sard mag, and power enterprise). It's good oil and not expensive at all for what it is. read into this what you will but I have been running the car with that oil hard for a fair while with no engine problems at all. yet I know of plenty of guys running mobil, and castrol that have had engine failures... I'm not saying it's the oils fault, mabye it's just coincidence? maybe buying cheap oil is an indicator of how much people spend on looking after there car? i don't know. what I do know is the chrono 300v works for me.

^^ The Castrol edge will be fine dont worry about it. As said its the ester in the oil that you pay for and i believe the motul 300v is 100%.

I use 300v and a K&N oil filter. Dam expensive but i think well worth it when you spend so much on mods.

I use penrite mineral oil all the time! 30 bucks for 5L + a nissan oil filter for about 6 bucks.

i dont see much point spending 100's on oil when it gets dumped every 4-5000km's, this point was made clear to me by a very very experienced and old engine building guru

Also one more thing my mate ran 300v in his GTR for a while and changed to Royal Purple which was then dynoed. He said it increased a few kws.

Edited by subzeroR33

Yes but this could also have something to do with the chickness of the oil.

Also one more thing my mate ran 300v in his GTR for a while and changed to Royal Purple which was then dynoed. He said it increased a few kws.

Being a old engine guru i guess he never build a engine revving past 7000rpm with 2 bar of pressure being hammered onto the engine bearings then ey ?

I use penrite mineral oil all the time! 30 bucks for 5L + a nissan oil filter for about 6 bucks.

i dont see much point spending 100's on oil when it gets dumped every 4-5000km's, this point was made clear to me by a very very experienced and old engine building guru

Being a old engine guru i guess he never build a engine revving past 7000rpm with 2 bar of pressure being hammered onto the engine bearings then ey ?

he builds race motors, and has alot of experience with rb motors. i trust him with my 500hp rb26 :laugh:

lol, I wouldn't trust him with my lawn mower if he recommends mineral oil for a 500hp RB26... especially as you are planning track use. mineral oil in a track RB26 is not a recipe for happiness.

I use Motul Turbolight 10W40 in my car every 5000km and i have never had any dramas with it. The 300V series of Motul oils are meant to be the exact same oils that Nismo use in their race cars (Nismo 350z etc), i think of the top of my head there are 4 different 300V oils. They are extremely good oils and the reason the 300V series of oils are so expensive is because of their Ester technology. Either way, Motul make great oils and if its good enough for Nismo, its good enough for me :laugh:

My 2 cents worth.

I've run Motul 8100 5w40 for the last 60,000km's straight after the motor was run in with PureOne oil Filters.

I've recently had the head off. Absolutely squeeky clean, bores look perfect.

Zero coking in the oil lines and I NEVER leave the car idling when I reach my destination.

I only use Motul 300V Chrono in my R33 GTR V-Spec and my R33 GTS-T.

I change the oil every 5,000 km with one of the new Nissan small diameter oil filters. These are the best as they are so easy to get into place even on the GTR.

You pay a lot for Motul but it is good insurance against a costly engine rebuild.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have engineer in my job title One of or motto's though is "we make and we break"
    • This is actually 2 whole different trains of thought that need to be addressed separately. No, as Matt says above, "Engineer" is not a directly protected title. A lot of guys who just do mechanical design via CAD, with or without even some sort of associate diploma in engineering, often have the job title of "Design Engineer". A train driver can probably still describe themselves as an engineer. But, to usefully get employment with anyone as a proper engineer, you're going to have to have at least the necessary and relevant degree qualification. You're not going to get a job as an electrical engineer if you have a chem eng degree, unless you can demonstrate x number of years of working in that capacity, sufficient knowledge, etc. Having the degree is at least in indication that you've seen the relevant text books, even if you haven't read them (like pretty much the last 10 years of graduates!). To be a self employed engineer.....you could get away with quite a lot pretending that you're suitably qualified, without actually being a proper engineer. But, you will find yourself unable to work for a large section of the client space because a lot demand CVs and capability statements when considering contracting for any engineering work these days. Insurances too. If you're not a proper engineer, it will be much harder to obtain proper PI insurance. Insurance companies have gotten hip to that. The "Professional Engineer" thing is a thing in Australia. If you have the right qualifications and experience you can apply to the relevant engineering top level body (mostly Engineers Australia, the less said about whom, the better), to be assessed and approved as a Chartered Professional Engineer, CPE. There are high bars to get over and a requirement for CPD to maintain it. The RPEQ thing is similar-ish, in that you have to demonstrate and maintain, but the bars are a little lower. It is required to be RPEQ in order to sign off as an engineer on any engineering design in Queensland. The other states haven't fully followed suit yet. There's "engineering" and there's "engineering". Being an engineer that signs off on timber (or even steel) frames for housing projects, council creek crossing bridges, etc, is a flavour of civil engineering that barely warrants the name, description and degree. That would be soul crushing work anyway. Being an automotive engineer working in the space where you have to sign off on modifications to cars and trucks would also be similarly soul crushing. At least partly because of the level of clientelle, their expecations, depths of bank balance, etc. And that brings us to your second question. No, we do not have professional engineers "do vehicle inspections". Well, not the regular roadworthies, etc etc. That's done by mechanics. There might be some vehicle standards engineers at the various state govco inspection stations where cars go to get defects cleared and so on, but that's because they (the cars) are there specifically for defect inspection and clearance and so the stakes are a little higher than on an annual lights and brakes working check. But, if you modify a vehicle in Australia, you have to get it engineered. A suitably qualified (and effectively licensed, which I will get back to) automotive engineer will have to go over the application, advise on what would be required to make the mods legal, supervise some parts of the work, inspect and test the results, and sign off. The "licensed" aspect comes from there being a list of approved engineers to do these things in each state. They have to jump through hoops set up by the govco vehicle standards divisions that mean only the suitably qualified can offer to and approve such mods.
    • It's got a problem Prank... It looks like both washer spray caps have fallen off this car... 😛
    • Meh, it's only got to last another 10 years or so until you'll be forbidden to drive it. Keep it dry and forget about it.
    • The title of Engineer is not protected. However different states have different rules about what an Engineer requires to operate. Engineering for a motor vehicle modification is very different to engineering for a bridge, electronics, etc, including what that engineer needs as certifications.   In Canberra, "Engineer" is the loosest category with basically nothing stopping you calling yourself and engineer and designing a bridge or building. From what I've reviewed, QLD has the strictest requirements through RPEIQ.
×
×
  • Create New...