Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have measured the comp housing on my 2nd GCG. It measures 54mm I.D. This means that it must be about a 52mm OD wheel. My other GCG must be around 54mm OD wheel (The one I am having surging issues with)

Anyone measured the comp wheel housing inner diameter.

Ans how about the exhaust housing. It seems to be bored out to around 57mm..on the 2nd GCG - the 1st one must be about 54mm

I.e.

1) Surging - Approx 54mm Comp wheel (About 56mm bore size) , 54mm exhaust wheel

2) Unknown - Approx 52mm Comp wheel (About 54mm bore size), 57mm exhaust wheel

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/178089-gcg-wheel-measuements/
Share on other sites

Im going to take both turbos to them and discuss. I have already been in contact with them..

I just wanted some dimensions from here if possible

The compressor wheel on 1 is too big - I will be reusing the one of the 2ndturbo. But the 2nd turbo has a chipped exhaust wheel and more play..

too many crap turbos here!

Im going to take both turbos to them and discuss. I have already been in contact with them..

I just wanted some dimensions from here if possible

The compressor wheel on 1 is too big - I will be reusing the one of the 2ndturbo. But the 2nd turbo has a chipped exhaust wheel and more play..

too many crap turbos here!

I've found that in the past, gcg haven't been very helpful in regards to discussing turbo tech. It may be that they are being protective of the wheels that they use etc.

Really knowledgeable bloke to speak to on here would be Dale FZ1. He knows his turbos.

Edited by MANWHORE

Just an interesting note.

My old s2 highflow looked to have the same comp as turbo 1 and the same exhaust side as turbo 2. BUT i remember my s2 highflow had a little groove cut into the inside of the snout right where the inducer tips sit (similar to stock). it was about 10mm wide and 1mm deep from memory (anti surge mod?). I'll see if i can dig out my old for sale thread photos and confirm. post-2863-1185400278_thumb.jpg

Nothing is ever as simple as it seems.

You'd have to consider the size and specs of each impeller, and the size of the housings they are fitted to before trying a mix & match approach. Might work, might not. Might find a R34 / VG30 housing will help to keep that surge prone cartridge in a happy zone.

I have PM'd you Ben

cheers

Edited by Dale FZ1
Nothing is ever as simple as it seems.

You'd have to consider the size and specs of each impeller, and the size of the housings they are fitted to before trying a mix & match approach. Might work, might not. Might find a R34 / VG30 housing will help to keep that surge prone cartridge in a happy zone.

I have PM'd you Ben

cheers

Dale, my thoughts exactly. My initial thought was to replace the rb25 exhaust housinng with a vg/gtt housing.

This is not an expensive thing to 'try' at all, since most engineering places/machine shops/turbo places with a lathe can machine the snout to whatever spec you want. That is in comparison to the price that gcg charge to repair/renew highflow turbos.

This should shift the power/airflow up a few hundred rpm (the op6 housing is significantly larger - 0.8ar as opposed to 0.6). The engine should be able to ingest the air at that rpm.

It's not really a waste even if it still surges, because it gives you the ability to make more power. I believe that if a turbo is to be upgraded, it shoudl be a worthwhile one :pirate:

Just an interesting note.

My old s2 highflow looked to have the same comp as turbo 1 and the same exhaust side as turbo 2. BUT i remember my s2 highflow had a little groove cut into the inside of the snout right where the inducer tips sit (similar to stock). it was about 10mm wide and 1mm deep from memory (anti surge mod?). I'll see if i can dig out my old for sale thread photos and confirm. post-2863-1185400278_thumb.jpg

Its amazing that they managed to machine an anti reversion groove into the already significiantly machined housing. Where the groove is, there is almost no meat left.

On my slide turbo, you can squeeze the snout on the comp housing and it moves.

Bhdave - that comp wheel looks almost like a stock one. See how they have machined it out but right near where the impeller is there is less material removed.

Did your turbo with the larger comp wheel surge?

Thanks for the lengthy PM dale. Will respond later. I have verniers so can measure it carefully

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey all,   I’ve got an RB25 with a trigger kit that includes a crank wheel, and I’ve hit a wall trying to sort a timing belt tracking issue. The belt either rides right on the edge of the cam/crank pulleys or walks slightly forward once the engine starts. It tracks okay-ish for a moment, then creeps right to the edge—and honestly, it’s stressing me out.   I’ve spent hours removing and reinstalling the belt, double-checking everything:   Tensioner setup is good, checked multiple times Idler pulley and washers are all in the correct places Followed the RB25 timing procedure step-by-step     The only thing I changed was the rear crank washer—I swapped the OEM one for a Neato version, and it made things worse. The belt now sits even more forward than before. I’m beginning to think the crank trigger wheel itself (from the trigger kit) is the issue—poor design or slightly off dimensions.   What’s strange is that with the previous belt setup, it actually ran fine for a couple of years—around 4,000 to 5,000 miles, even with hard driving and high RPMs. But even then, the belt was always riding right on the edge, and I know that’s not ideal or safe long term.   At this point, I’m debating whether to:   Machine a few mm off the crank trigger wheel to bring it back in line, or Replace it entirely with a better-designed unit     Only thing is, I already have the Cherry Hall sensors, bracket, etc.—I just want to replace the wheel only, not the entire kit. Anyone know a brand or supplier that sells just the crank trigger wheel on its own?   Would really appreciate any feedback—especially from anyone who’s run into this exact issue and found a reliable fix.   Thanks in advance.
    • Hi...a little refresh. Is Nistune gonna be enough to run BoV? Or do i need some proper ECU? 
    • Yep that's pretty much what I want to see. Racecars that look and sound like the Group A but with newer tech underneath to make them faster and safer. I'm sure there's enough VK-to-VN commodore, E30 BMWs and Foxbody mustangs shells around to make up a decent number of cars with hopefully a couple of sierras, rx7 and R31s in there too. 
    • Contact Jessestreeter.com/Skevas Racing/JustJap for a new r34 rb gearbox or go a cd00# conversion. No point playing with unknown condition gearboxes.
    • Such a shame places like Amaroo Park have been redeveloped, smaller tracks always make for good racing. Cheers for sharing @PranK there's some good Lakeside video's too. Its so hard with older the cars as parts are so rare and everything was made for a particular chassis at that point in time. Even the V8 Supercar Blueprint era cars are all different between each chassis within a team as they learnt things and made improvements. The COTF cars between each Chassis builder is different too especially motor/oil systems/intakes. The Group A stuff is worth so much too especially chassis with good history. The only way to do it would be composite panels and similar engine drivelines to the original cars. Ford sierra running Focus RS driveline, Commodore running a short stroke LS/LT or a Falcon with coyote and a H Pattern dog box. Could use a standard ecu across all models with a Torque Map and DBW for parity which is not even used in Supercars currently. Hell a TCM is almost a full chassis car these days and the suspension is not even close to standard style in the front running cars.  
×
×
  • Create New...