Jump to content
SAU Community

Team Wang Vs Btr - Long Sleeve Shirts - Aug Deca


Recommended Posts

OK Ladies,

Ive been chatting with Corrinne (D_I_F) from Team NSW and she has kindly offered to organise long sleeve shirts for this upcoming DECA in August.

The design is as follows:

post-26741-1185493409_thumb.jpgpost-26741-1185493431_thumb.jpg

Vic Version:

post-26741-1185493457_thumb.jpg

post-26741-1185493445_thumb.jpg

The above design is a rough layout - final desing/logo sizes, etc will be posted by Corinne shortly.

Sizes are expected to range from S - XXXL.

Costs will depend on number of shirts ordered.

We hope to be able to have something like NSW in black and VIC in white, but need to hear back from printer.

Corrine will post more info as it comes to hand.

But for now.....who's interested???

TO ORDER - you will need to send Corrine (D_I_F) a PM to confirm order.

Cheers

BEC

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Maybe on your guys vic ones you could have "its not the size of the logo that counts... its all in the timing of the WANG" or "power of the WANG"

or something equally as silly... that BTR thing is HUGE... obviously compensating for something

Maybe on your guys vic ones you could have "its not the size of the logo that counts... its all in the timing of the WANG" or "power of the WANG"

or something equally as silly... that BTR thing is HUGE

Yea sorry guys, I'm going to have the BTR logo resized so it doesn't oversize the wang.. :laughing-smiley-014:

So Yea, Any questions please pm me :(

Ok I've got a costing for the shit's they work out to be about $43 each.. The most expensive part of the cost is the set up fee's for the front side of the shirts..

I'm going to see what I can do to reduce these costs..

Im down for a NSW one. Only can i ask that we make the front left pocket area say SAU NSW, in a smaller size say 6-8 cm wide, then on the back have the large print that you show on the front? Also lose the Team BTR, should just be "BTR Beer Talk Racing"

Also, need to get approval from Boosted Zed, PORTS and Beer Baron before running off with their Track slogan... :)

Also before placing an order let me know where to email the verctor art image of the wang logo.

We don't want our wang's to be in poor quality now do we?

Also in! ... I like the small SAU logo idea from Bris (First and only time I will ever agree with him on the forums)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
    • Hey guys I’m chasing a Rb20det complete or bare block need a good running engine as mine has low comp 
    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
×
×
  • Create New...