Jump to content
SAU Community

Toyota's Answer To Nissan


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

As much as you lot go on and on about the GTRs and bathurst, the only one they won the race was red flagged.

LOL!

how come no one picked him up on this?

what about '91? forget about that eh? oh- you were 7 years old, sorry =P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fark.. how many of you clowns have horse blinkers on?

the fastest stock turbo'd AUTO soarer in aus runs 12.3 using stock turbo's as stated, darg radials, MV auto's stage one shift kit (no stall converter).

making 230rwkw.

let's a GTST (r32 or R33) do the same...

A stock AUTO TT soarer weighs 1560kg

how is that 600kg heavier than a skyline as some knob put it?

Only problem with the soarer is the fact that it is useless.

it's a 2 door that has piss all back seat room.

piss all boot room.

and yet is a massive car.

Chaser is where it's at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which is why im am choosing a soarer over an r32 gts-t as my next car.

well of course the soarer is faster than a 32. they are the slowest of the skylines out of the r32-r34's. soarers without work are in no way quicker than an equally modded r33 or r34. i have been up against a few. the manuals might be very close, but good luck finding one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty good debate goin on hear guys

Iv got mates that own twin turbo soarers and heres street tested results for ya s. A auto twin turbo soarer will beat a standard or lightly moded auto R33 Gtst but wont beat a manual R33 or R32 Gtst. Like someone else said the soarer has no real purpose besides grandpa s sunday driver or for cruisin. They deffently have power and are a good cheaper alternative but its NISSAN ALL THE WAY for me

Nuff said :santa:

Edited by smackm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah everyone i know that has a soarer has had trouble with the digital dash stuffin up and everytime theres a problem with car it comes up in japanese haha. :laughing-smiley-014:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this thread is funny..

toyotas answer to nissan would be the new TRD AURION....that would kill a few gtst out there!

http://www.webwombat.com.au/motoring/news_...upercharged.htm

and heres something to compete with everything else..

http://www.webwombat.com.au/motoring/news_...oyota-ft-hs.htm

Edited by infected flow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aurion ay

supercharged 3.5L V6 with an estermated power output of 315hp might be able to keep up with a standard 185kw that a standard R33 Gtst pumps haha. It is a nice car but its not toyotas answer to nissan its there answer to holden and ford

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aurion ay

supercharged 3.5L V6 with an estermated power output of 315hp might be able to keep up with a standard 185kw that a standard R33 Gtst pumps haha. It is a nice car but its not toyotas answer to nissan its there answer to holden and ford

well actually its on par but better where as the r34 has 206kw at the engine..therefor it would be better and more comfortable the aurion...

hmm sounds like u should get ya facts straight....

if we were talking about all out power thats a different story but we aint...haha you guys were compaing the soarer to the gtst and i was comparing the gtt to the aurion...

cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well actually its on par but better where as the r34 has 206kw at the engine..therefor it would be better and more comfortable the aurion...

hmm sounds like u should get ya facts straight....

if we were talking about all out power thats a different story but we aint...haha you guys were compaing the soarer to the gtst and i was comparing the gtt to the aurion...

cheers.

No offense to you...nor anyone else who uses this figure 206kw.

The figure was made up by manufacturers in Japan in the late 80's

and followed through to the late nineties.

They thought that a KW war would not help the development of the cars...(one thing Holden and Ford here

should have learned from)....and so it was a gentlemen agreement to agree that if any car exceeded 206kw

it would be rated at that.

Everyone knows a GTR KW out of the factory was more like 240KW's odd....

What pisses me off though is some EPA tests conducted use this figure...ie noise DB/REV

Back to the Topic.................................everyone by a gtr this way they grow in popularity

and like the supply and demand curve..(which I have always found it hard to understand)....

the prices will increase............and we will be rich......rich I say...hahahahahahahahah

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It depends on what the guy who bought its Ratio is. Mine is a 4.36 Jus Jap told me anything above a 3:9 has equal length shafts which the Nismo center's shafts were not.
    • If those shafts in the last 2 photos are the ones that came with the diff, you have no hope of fitting the other ones because they are completely different 
    • I have recently fitted a Nismo GT Pro Center second Hand buy still in the box i got stubs with it but they are 5 bolt and I need 6 (3x2) I was told by Just Jap that for a 4:36 ratio the stub axles are equal length sku 38220-0V161. They didn't have any in stock but I picked up the ones pictured. The one with 5 bolt are the ones that came with the LSD. The right side went in no issues but the right....I have happened the fk out of it put it in a press and it still sticks out about 5mm too far. It was sticking out about 25mm but after bashing it like Chris Brown did to Rhianna I managed to get it a bit further in but seems stuck again now. Any ideas? Should I just leave it 5mm out and send it?        
    • Meh. I "see" a typo above, that should have been "sell".
    • The clutch pedal has a procedure for adjustment. This can only be done after you are 100% sure the system is absolutely free of air bubbles. You must bleed the clutch master cylinder first, then the "separation pipe" which is the clutch damper line, then the operating cylinder as detailed in the service manual. Also, you must fully depress the clutch pedal between shifts. Just because you can't feel it grabbing does not mean the input shaft is truly decoupled from the crank. At high RPM clutch plates are vibrating and moving around, you need to give it the best possible chance of success. On the BCNR33 Nissan revises these adjustment procedures slightly but not by much: I would be careful with trying to play games with these adjustments. As for the Nismo operating cylinder they say a lot of things. In practice the twin plate clutch needs less movement on the clutch fork to disengage because the whole stackup of the flywheel + friction plates + pressure plate is much taller. Personally if you find that the clutch still disengages too high at the top of the travel I would try the Nismo operating cylinder. Make sure to follow the air bleed procedures. 
×
×
  • Create New...