Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

As much as you lot go on and on about the GTRs and bathurst, the only one they won the race was red flagged.

LOL!

how come no one picked him up on this?

what about '91? forget about that eh? oh- you were 7 years old, sorry =P

fark.. how many of you clowns have horse blinkers on?

the fastest stock turbo'd AUTO soarer in aus runs 12.3 using stock turbo's as stated, darg radials, MV auto's stage one shift kit (no stall converter).

making 230rwkw.

let's a GTST (r32 or R33) do the same...

A stock AUTO TT soarer weighs 1560kg

how is that 600kg heavier than a skyline as some knob put it?

Only problem with the soarer is the fact that it is useless.

it's a 2 door that has piss all back seat room.

piss all boot room.

and yet is a massive car.

Chaser is where it's at.

Which is why im am choosing a soarer over an r32 gts-t as my next car.

well of course the soarer is faster than a 32. they are the slowest of the skylines out of the r32-r34's. soarers without work are in no way quicker than an equally modded r33 or r34. i have been up against a few. the manuals might be very close, but good luck finding one.

Pretty good debate goin on hear guys

Iv got mates that own twin turbo soarers and heres street tested results for ya s. A auto twin turbo soarer will beat a standard or lightly moded auto R33 Gtst but wont beat a manual R33 or R32 Gtst. Like someone else said the soarer has no real purpose besides grandpa s sunday driver or for cruisin. They deffently have power and are a good cheaper alternative but its NISSAN ALL THE WAY for me

Nuff said :santa:

Edited by smackm

this thread is funny..

toyotas answer to nissan would be the new TRD AURION....that would kill a few gtst out there!

http://www.webwombat.com.au/motoring/news_...upercharged.htm

and heres something to compete with everything else..

http://www.webwombat.com.au/motoring/news_...oyota-ft-hs.htm

Edited by infected flow

Aurion ay

supercharged 3.5L V6 with an estermated power output of 315hp might be able to keep up with a standard 185kw that a standard R33 Gtst pumps haha. It is a nice car but its not toyotas answer to nissan its there answer to holden and ford

Aurion ay

supercharged 3.5L V6 with an estermated power output of 315hp might be able to keep up with a standard 185kw that a standard R33 Gtst pumps haha. It is a nice car but its not toyotas answer to nissan its there answer to holden and ford

well actually its on par but better where as the r34 has 206kw at the engine..therefor it would be better and more comfortable the aurion...

hmm sounds like u should get ya facts straight....

if we were talking about all out power thats a different story but we aint...haha you guys were compaing the soarer to the gtst and i was comparing the gtt to the aurion...

cheers.

well actually its on par but better where as the r34 has 206kw at the engine..therefor it would be better and more comfortable the aurion...

hmm sounds like u should get ya facts straight....

if we were talking about all out power thats a different story but we aint...haha you guys were compaing the soarer to the gtst and i was comparing the gtt to the aurion...

cheers.

No offense to you...nor anyone else who uses this figure 206kw.

The figure was made up by manufacturers in Japan in the late 80's

and followed through to the late nineties.

They thought that a KW war would not help the development of the cars...(one thing Holden and Ford here

should have learned from)....and so it was a gentlemen agreement to agree that if any car exceeded 206kw

it would be rated at that.

Everyone knows a GTR KW out of the factory was more like 240KW's odd....

What pisses me off though is some EPA tests conducted use this figure...ie noise DB/REV

Back to the Topic.................................everyone by a gtr this way they grow in popularity

and like the supply and demand curve..(which I have always found it hard to understand)....

the prices will increase............and we will be rich......rich I say...hahahahahahahahah

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm aware, but unless you're actually seeing the voltage the ECU is seeing and you're able to verify the sensors are actually working I find it hard to just trust STFT/LTFT. I will say, logging the ECU comes naturally to me because it's one of the lowest effort methods of diagnosis and I do similar things in my day job all the time. Staring at 20+ charts looking for something that isn't quite right isn't for everyone. NDS1 allows you to log almost everything so that's normally what I do and then sort out the data later. 
    • Silly question, as I bet you've checked already, but the motor turns over by hand yes? I suspect Neil has a spare starter, though if not, I believe I have a spare R33 (or two) starter.
    • Yeah just run one of those posts to the Link like GTSBoy said. From google it looks like a "mishimoto boost controller" is a manual boost controller. Since you already have the link just buy any MAC valve and plumb it in where the mishimoto is now. Wires to the solenoid should come from the Link's / standard loom boost control wiring (I guess you have an r32, not sure if it is gtst or gtr, if it is GTR where is a 2 pin connector near the engine bay fuse box/injector resistor for that purpose, assuming the standard boost controller is gone)  
    • No. The ECU's hose is for a connetcion between the plenum (assuming single throttle body, not ITBs) and the ECU's internal MAP sensor. This is the primary load measurement of the ECU - so you need to get this one right. This has NOTHING to do with the boost contol. The wastegate also needs to see a boost signal - but it is actually far better for it NOT TO COME FROM THE PLENUM (again, assuming single TB, and not ITBs). This should come from the turbo's compressor housing (assuming there is a nipple on there, which there might well not be), or on the boost pipe somewhere between the turbo and the TB. On the pipe from the turbo to the intercooler is usually most convenient. The boost controller is then located between that boost source and the wastegate, ACCORDING TO THE CORRECT PLUMBING DRAWING FOR THAT BOOST CONTROLLER. There is no general diagram or instruction that will be correct for every case. Then the other ports on the plenum are for purposes such as Duncan described. If the boost controller has an internal MAP sensor, for a boost display, etc, then it will want to be hooked up there, alongside the ECU and the FPR.
    • Ok gotcha, so one post to fpr  another to bov  and I have the mishimoto boost controller and a link g4+ so I’d just have the tuner set it up properly. For the last two from plenum post throttle to  ecu/ boost controller, I know that I have a hose coming from the ecu that I was confused about so I assume that’s what connect to the boost controller from the ecu? And then the last is just from plenum to boost controller then to wastegate?
×
×
  • Create New...