Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was speaking to a cpl coppers last night about the number of skyline thefts occuring at the moment, they told me that within the last 2-3 days they have apprehended a guy and girl who are well known for stealing skylines. I wonder if this will help decrease the current spree?

They also said for every high speed chase that makes the news, theres another 20 or more that dont - and there is a phenomonal amount of cars which are dumped and set on fire in their LSA (eliz/salisbury). Such a waste to joyride it, then torch it - dont know what they get out of it?!

Bout time something started happening.

This is only the first step though. The courts need to dish some serious whoop ass on these people.

Maybe they should take a hand off them like they do in some other countries :santa:

that might deter them a little rather than a 6 month stay in hotel de la jail.

all we need is details on where they live then they will get what they deserve, but in sayin that im prety sure these guys got done like 5 months ago and with all the skyline been done over in the past months if its all linked they will get a decent bit of time.

Bout time something started happening.

This is only the first step though. The courts need to dish some serious whoop ass on these people.

Maybe they should take a hand off them like they do in some other countries :action-smiley-069:

that might deter them a little rather than a 6 month stay in hotel de la jail. good behaviour.

the courts are far too soft on criminals, id be surprised if they got jail time.

our judiciary system has been under fire in the past for going too soft on convicted crims!

what would be the best is if they're judged by jury and the jury will consist of skyline owners! doesn't seem fair but hey! it ain't fair on people who worked hard for their cars to only have them stolen and trashed!

mayeb its this guy

COURT 1 at 11:00a.m. - Before Judge CHIVELL; (For sentence)

POLICE

1 DCCRM-07-457 JONES, Brian Robert Charles Drive Or Use Motor Vehicle Without Consent

2 DCCRM-07-458 JONES, Brian Robert Charles Drive Or Use Motor Vehicle Without Consent/ Drive In Reckless Or Dangerous Manner

3 DCCRM-07-548 JONES, Brian Robert Charles Non-Aggravated Serious Criminal Trespass (Non-Residential)/ Dishonestly Take Property Without Owner's Consent

4 DCCRM-07-860 JONES, Brian Robert Charles Drive Unregistered Motor Vehicle On A Road/ Fail To Truly Answer/ Hinder Police

5 DCCRM-07-916 JONES, Brian Robert Charles Fail To Comply With Bail Agreement

THE QUEEN (STATE)

6 DCCRM-05-1383 JONES, Brian Robert Charles Being Unlawfully On Premises/ Theft(2)/ Serious Criminal Trespass In A Place Of Residence/ Common Assault

taken from case list site.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ah right. Maybe my rb just loves chewing through batteries lol.
    • On the R34 can't you just unplug the IACV? This is the way I've always done it on the R33. Disconnect IACV, get it idling around 650rpm, and then do a power reset on the ECU to get it to relearn idle (factory ECU).   The big reason no one has touched on as to why you'd want to get the base idle right, is that it means the computer needs to make smaller adjustments to get a good idle at 700-750rpm.   Also, cleaning the IACV won't normally make the car suddenly idle lower or higher. The main issue with the IACV gumming up is that the valve sticks. This means the inputs the ECU gives, aren't translating to changes in air flow. This can cause idle choppy ness as the ECU is now needing to give a lot of input to get movement, but then it moves too far, and then has to do the same in reverse, and it can mean the ECU can't catch stalls quickly either.
    • 12.8 for a great condition, fully charged battery. If the battery will only ever properly charge to about 12.2V, the battery is well worn, and will be dead soon. When I say properly charge, I mean disconnect it from the car, charge it to its max, and then put your multimeter on it, and see what it reads about an hour later. Dieing batteries will hold a higher "surface charge", but the minutest load, even from just a multimeter (which in the scheme of things is considered totally irrelevant, especially at this level) will be enough over an hour to make the surface charge disappear.   I spend wayyy too much time analysing battery voltages for customers when they whinge that our equipment (telematics device) is causing their battery to drain all the time. Nearly every case I can call it within about 2 months of when the battery will be completely dead. Our bigger customers don't even debate it with me any more ha ha ha. A battery at 12.4 to 12.6 I'd still be happy enough with. However, there's a lot of things that can cause a parasitic draw in a car, first of which is alarms and immobilisers. To start checking, put your multimeter into amps, (and then connect it properly) and measure your power draw with everything off. Typical car battery is about 40aH. Realistically, you'll get about half this before the car won't start. So a 100mA power drain will see you pretty much near unstartable in 8 days.
    • Car should sit at 12.2 or more, maybe 12.6 or 12.7 when fully charged and happy. If there is a decent enough parasitic load then it will certainly go lower than 12.2 with time. You can't beat physics.
    • Ok guess I can rule out the battery, probably even the starter and alternator (maybe) as well. I'm gonna clean those leads and see what happens if it's still shit I might take it to an auto electrician. Unless the immobiliser is that f**king heavy, but it shouldn't be.  If I start the car every day, starts up perfectly never an issue. Isn't 12v low, shouldn't it be around 12.5v?
×
×
  • Create New...