Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So theres always discussion of the relative performance of a turbo-back versus a catback system, and the benefits of adding the split front pipe and high flow cat to a cat-back system, but:

Starting with a stock system, is it better value to just throw on the front/dump and cat and leave the stock catback on there, and save money for something else? Or will an aftermarket catback have a discernable advantage over the factory part?

The car is an R32 GTS-T and my reason for wanting to keep the stock catback, apart from cost, is I don't want it to become loud and I don't fancy big shiny cannons. Is the R32 muffler restricitive enough to warrant replacing?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/178911-frontcat-or-turbo-back/
Share on other sites

Hey man

Basically the stock exhaust is too restrictive to flow anything more than what it does, and you wont see many improvements/gains unless you do upgrade the exhaust.

Exhaust is a good starting point due to the fact the easier the engine breathes, the easier it is for it to produce power, sort of like a healthy person.. if you get what I mean lol

Hence the 2 mods people usually do, turbo back exhaust, and pod filter/cold air intake.

Once the exhaust gases can escape quicker the easier the turbo breathes, less strain, more boost which obviously in turns equals more power.

Doesn't always have to be loud, get a muffler put in, and a high flow cat, or a resonator, that should keep the noise level down.

The ideal size, best flowing is a 3" turbo back. You wont have to go any bigger.

No ones says you have to have a canon just because its a Jap car lol.

Just get a stock straight/twin 3" tip out the back, will look pretty standard to the eye.

Hope some of that helps. :)

Thanks,

Abu

Edited by abu
So theres always discussion of the relative performance of a turbo-back versus a catback system, and the benefits of adding the split front pipe and high flow cat to a cat-back system, but:

Starting with a stock system, is it better value to just throw on the front/dump and cat and leave the stock catback on there, and save money for something else? Or will an aftermarket catback have a discernable advantage over the factory part?

The car is an R32 GTS-T and my reason for wanting to keep the stock catback, apart from cost, is I don't want it to become loud and I don't fancy big shiny cannons. Is the R32 muffler restricitive enough to warrant replacing?

Turbo-back is the only way to go. Putting on a cat back alone is a waste of time.

If you leave the standard front/dump on, the gas comes out of the turbo into a 2 inch tube, then on to a 3 inch tube. The bas is still restricted, so you'll notice little, if any power increase. Ditto if you add just the front pipe and have a standard 2 inch catback.

I went for a Batmbl split front/dump and an HKS hipower silent exhaust. Very quiet, not too large, sounds good on an R32.

At the end of the day though, it's just a pipe. As long as the steel is good quality, and the bends are mandrel bent, any exhaust workshop can make one up for you. I was a bit of a brand whore when I bought that zorst, though I don't regret it.

You can get them through Nengun, though you have to wait a while.

just one questions ... may be related but

anyway

so if you get turbo back exhaust and stay with standard intake or front pipe whatever you guys call it... is that right things to do? i mean as air comes in to engine, say for instance, 20 and with 3inch turbo back exhaust you only flow air out 20 right? but if you get bigger front pipe and say now 40 air can flows in. the 3 inch turbo back exhaust will be able to flow air out 40 maybe..

thats the reason you put bigger exhaust in your car isnt it?

please correct me if im wrong.... not very very expert on mechanic... fu#$kin noob on this area..but this is what im thinking.......-.-;

anyway.....

so! all i want to ask you guys..!!! if you wanna have bigger exhaust, shouldn't you have bigger front pipe to matching the air flow?

or it doesnt really matter just put bigger turbo back exhaust with standard front pipe?

cz just thinking of getting exhaust my self...

thanks....

paul

Edited by tyaos

Thanks abu, that first answer was all I wanted to know :). It's just that some stock exhaust systems aren't restricitive enough to bother with upgrading - in HPI issue 73 they show that a stock GTR catback actually gets more power than an aftermarket bit - and say that since the front pipe and catalytic converter are the most restrictive parts of the exhaust, upgrading after the cat isnt always necessary, as long as the muffler is free flowing.

Kozeyekan - you didnt read the question champ :whistling:

the middle and rear mufflers add a fair bit of restriction. if you ever cut 1 open you will see what i mean. they don't just flow straight through. they do a big S bend through the centre. the rear muffler is less restrictive.

the cat isn't that restrictive, neither is the front/dump pipe. they still add restriction, but not as much as the rear system.

as for mufflers, you don't need a big shiney stainless cannon. ou can just get a 3" oval muffler. they will make the car quieter. companies like lukey and x-force sell 3" oval mufflers pretty cheap, and they work better than a cannon at reducing noise.

just one questions ... may be related but

anyway

so if you get turbo back exhaust and stay with standard intake or front pipe whatever you guys call it... is that right things to do? i mean as air comes in to engine, say for instance, 20 and with 3inch turbo back exhaust you only flow air out 20 right? but if you get bigger front pipe and say now 40 air can flows in. the 3 inch turbo back exhaust will be able to flow air out 40 maybe..

thats the reason you put bigger exhaust in your car isnt it?

please correct me if im wrong.... not very very expert on mechanic... fu#$kin noob on this area..but this is what im thinking.......-.-;

anyway.....

so! all i want to ask you guys..!!! if you wanna have bigger exhaust, shouldn't you have bigger front pipe to matching the air flow?

or it doesnt really matter just put bigger turbo back exhaust with standard front pipe?

cz just thinking of getting exhaust my self...

thanks....

paul

I think you're talking about air coming in, like thru the filter and FMIC etc before it goes in the engine....and comparing that too air coming out the exhasut.

Intake pipe flow = outake zorst flow ???

DEFINATE NO

.....What happens to the air inside the engine...it explodes !

So the volume it takes up is heaps more on the way out.

Part of the reason why turbos actually work,.

If the out was the same as the in, the turbo wouldn't spool enough to FORCE the air thru the intake.

Make sense? :(

PS, the 'Front Pipe' is the pipe coming off the turbo, or the dump pipe. I always get those 2 mixed up.

Most common you might recognise is the front/dump pipe which is a single 'S' shaped pipe doing the job of 2 pipes

I think you're talking about air coming in, like thru the filter and FMIC etc before it goes in the engine....and comparing that too air coming out the exhasut.

Intake pipe flow = outake zorst flow ???

DEFINATE NO

.....What happens to the air inside the engine...it explodes !

So the volume it takes up is heaps more on the way out.

Part of the reason why turbos actually work,.

If the out was the same as the in, the turbo wouldn't spool enough to FORCE the air thru the intake.

Make sense? >_<

PS, the 'Front Pipe' is the pipe coming off the turbo, or the dump pipe. I always get those 2 mixed up.

Most common you might recognise is the front/dump pipe which is a single 'S' shaped pipe doing the job of 2 pipes

thx man

its all make sense!

thx for your info!!!

cheers

paul

Thanks abu, that first answer was all I wanted to know >_<. It's just that some stock exhaust systems aren't restricitive enough to bother with upgrading - in HPI issue 73 they show that a stock GTR catback actually gets more power than an aftermarket bit - and say that since the front pipe and catalytic converter are the most restrictive parts of the exhaust, upgrading after the cat isnt always necessary, as long as the muffler is free flowing.

Kozeyekan - you didnt read the question champ >_<

Not a problem man, glad I could help.

Thanks,

Abu

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Reasonably hard, although I haven't run it with the new Endless setup yet. The old brakes were F50's on 335mm rotors and the car did a 1:40.6 at Phillip Island which is a reasonable time, I'm seeing high 600s on the temperature paint. A guy I know ran the Endless fluid at WTAC without issues and he was doing 1:33's I think (Evo) with a 355/332 setup. I don't get out to the track as much as I'd like but we put the car on the hoist and spanner check every bolt and re-paint mark everything, bleed the brakes, change the fuel, check the coolant system and re-bleed blah blah blah before every event. Motorsport is expensive, RB's are expensive so a couple of hours before an event is time well spent. It's also a net time saving because if you can keep your RB from self destructing it saves you time in the long term!
    • Welcome Alice......hope you have a bit more luck from here on! What was done in the build?  
    • Hello! I'm new here, I have an R33 GTST that is currently being finished up! Last year was pretty rough, blew two stock turbos so I decided to build the car. Has been down since November, but I get it back next weekend!
    • Hello, I believe my car was imported to America in the 2000s by Kaizo Industries. Would anyone be able to help me find more info on them? I've only found all the basic stuff like that paul walker bnr34, them being shutdown by feds, just stuff like that. Any help would be much appreciated, thanks!
    • I am using Motec M150.  I am not working on the car myself actually.  My workshop is giving all these info, they are quite reputable in the industry and are very familiar with Motec and RBs and have done a few big setups with VCam and single turbo on RBs.  In fact, they built and tuned my engine from day one.  But they are stumped with my engine at the moment and cannot work out how come the compression is so low with the VCam. They told me that they have now swapped in some Kelford cams (without the VCam) and can achieve around 130psi compression and the low end torque is better, but now the engine is doughy as.  It boosts and peaks at more than 1000rpm slower, with twin HKS GTIII RS, it doesn't get full boost until over 5000rpm. I have always thought the VCam was a bit disappointing at the low rpm. To a point I had to ride the clutch a fair bit to get up a small hill from stand still.  That was when I had a clutch.  Now changing to a 8HP, I don't have that luxury and this problem has become a major issue. I am beginning to think the VCam never work since the day it was installed.  Maybe it was just sitting at the most advanced point, that is why it went good at top end but very ordinary at the bottom.  Therefore, with the help of the Holinger 6 speed and paddle shift, as long as it was moving, it drove pretty good.
×
×
  • Create New...