Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So theres always discussion of the relative performance of a turbo-back versus a catback system, and the benefits of adding the split front pipe and high flow cat to a cat-back system, but:

Starting with a stock system, is it better value to just throw on the front/dump and cat and leave the stock catback on there, and save money for something else? Or will an aftermarket catback have a discernable advantage over the factory part?

The car is an R32 GTS-T and my reason for wanting to keep the stock catback, apart from cost, is I don't want it to become loud and I don't fancy big shiny cannons. Is the R32 muffler restricitive enough to warrant replacing?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/178911-frontcat-or-turbo-back/
Share on other sites

Hey man

Basically the stock exhaust is too restrictive to flow anything more than what it does, and you wont see many improvements/gains unless you do upgrade the exhaust.

Exhaust is a good starting point due to the fact the easier the engine breathes, the easier it is for it to produce power, sort of like a healthy person.. if you get what I mean lol

Hence the 2 mods people usually do, turbo back exhaust, and pod filter/cold air intake.

Once the exhaust gases can escape quicker the easier the turbo breathes, less strain, more boost which obviously in turns equals more power.

Doesn't always have to be loud, get a muffler put in, and a high flow cat, or a resonator, that should keep the noise level down.

The ideal size, best flowing is a 3" turbo back. You wont have to go any bigger.

No ones says you have to have a canon just because its a Jap car lol.

Just get a stock straight/twin 3" tip out the back, will look pretty standard to the eye.

Hope some of that helps. :)

Thanks,

Abu

Edited by abu
So theres always discussion of the relative performance of a turbo-back versus a catback system, and the benefits of adding the split front pipe and high flow cat to a cat-back system, but:

Starting with a stock system, is it better value to just throw on the front/dump and cat and leave the stock catback on there, and save money for something else? Or will an aftermarket catback have a discernable advantage over the factory part?

The car is an R32 GTS-T and my reason for wanting to keep the stock catback, apart from cost, is I don't want it to become loud and I don't fancy big shiny cannons. Is the R32 muffler restricitive enough to warrant replacing?

Turbo-back is the only way to go. Putting on a cat back alone is a waste of time.

If you leave the standard front/dump on, the gas comes out of the turbo into a 2 inch tube, then on to a 3 inch tube. The bas is still restricted, so you'll notice little, if any power increase. Ditto if you add just the front pipe and have a standard 2 inch catback.

I went for a Batmbl split front/dump and an HKS hipower silent exhaust. Very quiet, not too large, sounds good on an R32.

At the end of the day though, it's just a pipe. As long as the steel is good quality, and the bends are mandrel bent, any exhaust workshop can make one up for you. I was a bit of a brand whore when I bought that zorst, though I don't regret it.

You can get them through Nengun, though you have to wait a while.

just one questions ... may be related but

anyway

so if you get turbo back exhaust and stay with standard intake or front pipe whatever you guys call it... is that right things to do? i mean as air comes in to engine, say for instance, 20 and with 3inch turbo back exhaust you only flow air out 20 right? but if you get bigger front pipe and say now 40 air can flows in. the 3 inch turbo back exhaust will be able to flow air out 40 maybe..

thats the reason you put bigger exhaust in your car isnt it?

please correct me if im wrong.... not very very expert on mechanic... fu#$kin noob on this area..but this is what im thinking.......-.-;

anyway.....

so! all i want to ask you guys..!!! if you wanna have bigger exhaust, shouldn't you have bigger front pipe to matching the air flow?

or it doesnt really matter just put bigger turbo back exhaust with standard front pipe?

cz just thinking of getting exhaust my self...

thanks....

paul

Edited by tyaos

Thanks abu, that first answer was all I wanted to know :). It's just that some stock exhaust systems aren't restricitive enough to bother with upgrading - in HPI issue 73 they show that a stock GTR catback actually gets more power than an aftermarket bit - and say that since the front pipe and catalytic converter are the most restrictive parts of the exhaust, upgrading after the cat isnt always necessary, as long as the muffler is free flowing.

Kozeyekan - you didnt read the question champ :whistling:

the middle and rear mufflers add a fair bit of restriction. if you ever cut 1 open you will see what i mean. they don't just flow straight through. they do a big S bend through the centre. the rear muffler is less restrictive.

the cat isn't that restrictive, neither is the front/dump pipe. they still add restriction, but not as much as the rear system.

as for mufflers, you don't need a big shiney stainless cannon. ou can just get a 3" oval muffler. they will make the car quieter. companies like lukey and x-force sell 3" oval mufflers pretty cheap, and they work better than a cannon at reducing noise.

just one questions ... may be related but

anyway

so if you get turbo back exhaust and stay with standard intake or front pipe whatever you guys call it... is that right things to do? i mean as air comes in to engine, say for instance, 20 and with 3inch turbo back exhaust you only flow air out 20 right? but if you get bigger front pipe and say now 40 air can flows in. the 3 inch turbo back exhaust will be able to flow air out 40 maybe..

thats the reason you put bigger exhaust in your car isnt it?

please correct me if im wrong.... not very very expert on mechanic... fu#$kin noob on this area..but this is what im thinking.......-.-;

anyway.....

so! all i want to ask you guys..!!! if you wanna have bigger exhaust, shouldn't you have bigger front pipe to matching the air flow?

or it doesnt really matter just put bigger turbo back exhaust with standard front pipe?

cz just thinking of getting exhaust my self...

thanks....

paul

I think you're talking about air coming in, like thru the filter and FMIC etc before it goes in the engine....and comparing that too air coming out the exhasut.

Intake pipe flow = outake zorst flow ???

DEFINATE NO

.....What happens to the air inside the engine...it explodes !

So the volume it takes up is heaps more on the way out.

Part of the reason why turbos actually work,.

If the out was the same as the in, the turbo wouldn't spool enough to FORCE the air thru the intake.

Make sense? :(

PS, the 'Front Pipe' is the pipe coming off the turbo, or the dump pipe. I always get those 2 mixed up.

Most common you might recognise is the front/dump pipe which is a single 'S' shaped pipe doing the job of 2 pipes

I think you're talking about air coming in, like thru the filter and FMIC etc before it goes in the engine....and comparing that too air coming out the exhasut.

Intake pipe flow = outake zorst flow ???

DEFINATE NO

.....What happens to the air inside the engine...it explodes !

So the volume it takes up is heaps more on the way out.

Part of the reason why turbos actually work,.

If the out was the same as the in, the turbo wouldn't spool enough to FORCE the air thru the intake.

Make sense? >_<

PS, the 'Front Pipe' is the pipe coming off the turbo, or the dump pipe. I always get those 2 mixed up.

Most common you might recognise is the front/dump pipe which is a single 'S' shaped pipe doing the job of 2 pipes

thx man

its all make sense!

thx for your info!!!

cheers

paul

Thanks abu, that first answer was all I wanted to know >_<. It's just that some stock exhaust systems aren't restricitive enough to bother with upgrading - in HPI issue 73 they show that a stock GTR catback actually gets more power than an aftermarket bit - and say that since the front pipe and catalytic converter are the most restrictive parts of the exhaust, upgrading after the cat isnt always necessary, as long as the muffler is free flowing.

Kozeyekan - you didnt read the question champ >_<

Not a problem man, glad I could help.

Thanks,

Abu

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How's everyone going? Just a shout-out introducing myself. I'm James, I live on the north side of Brisbane. I bought an R33 that had been left to rot in someone's front yard for 14 years. Apparently, it has immobiliser/fuel issues. Long story short, it's suffering from a seized engine, plus whatever else turns up once it runs. The car is pretty good considering it sat for so long. It pretty much died after being imported. It has a bunch of Jap parts and a full Top Secret body kit. It's painted Fiat Turchese Festival, or aqua blue if you're not French. Another project to throw money at!
    • So the clockspring is responsible for the indicators cancelling on their own? I thought that was the function of that white thing in the center (any idea what it's called?)
    • Can you log IAT? Whilst WTA coolers have their place, doing any sort of sustained run is not one of them There are fixes that slow down the heat soak, like ice boxes, which don't last that long, and interchillers, which are fairly expensive, up grades to the WTA cooling radiator, which may require a bigger pump, and upgrades to the reservoir size,  and upgrades to the cooling fans, but, it all still heat soaks, and takes ages to come down in hot weather  For a turbo, that isn't locked into WTA like my PD blower is, can you not possibly swap to a nice air to air intercooler????, it would be better for sustained runs then, and have alot less things that could go wrong in my opinion 
    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
×
×
  • Create New...