Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok, I thought VG30 was .7 also, I should have the AVO this week for $480

sounds abit pricey. i picked up a whole vg30 single turbo for 200.. its worthwhile, im confused at why people think about the lag so much, its not like your bolting a gt30 on or something, lag is abit more than stock but less than larger turbo, its really nothing to worry about, if u know how to drive your car and use your revs you'll be more than happy..

Really would like to know how laggy it is. At the moment the R33 highflow with a slightly smaller exh wheel and bigg comp wheel than current GCG feels a little doughy..maybe because its running a bit rich.

The FMIC definately killed the response a bit..

Are HKS GTRS a lot less laggy than the R33 highflow with VG30.

Is a standard R33 high flow more comparable to a GTRS?

are u still running stock computer/?? coz the stock computer dumps a whole lot of fuel in when u plant the foot so thats probably half the problem... get gcg to do the hiflow and put the vg30 ex housing on and u have a ripper of a setup, i cant speak hi enough for these hybrid gcg turbos, theres awesome..

Im ripping my turbo off tonight and getting it fixed.

I have a blown R33 GCG and VG30 turbo for parts. Might sell 1 of them or sell some of the parts after I've used what I need. The VG30 BB turbo is actually in really good nick. No shaft play. Might wack a different exh housing on it and sell it as a hybrid.

Have you had yours tuned CHris? If so how does it go? You happy with it now? What sort of power you making?

Most likely, when you try and pull the exhaust housing off the vg30 turbo, it will be severely seized on. I.e. unless if you have an oxy torch and a hydraulic puller. There's a reasoanble chance that when you pull the housing off you might crack the wheel.

Semi tuned - road tuned. Just gotta stick it onto the dyno to check power. I'm not happy with this one. I'm most likely going for a gcg vg30 or a precision turbos one.

sounds abit pricey. i picked up a whole vg30 single turbo for 200.. its worthwhile, im confused at why people think about the lag so much, its not like your bolting a gt30 on or something, lag is abit more than stock but less than larger turbo, its really nothing to worry about, if u know how to drive your car and use your revs you'll be more than happy..

price isn't too bad thats ready to bolt on, and no other mods needed, machined out to suit gt30, just looking for a comfortable 250-260 rwkw, with std housings it makes a comfortable 230 but runs into back pressure at high rpm. I was told AVO housing has a better wastegate design, will see :laugh: !

I have never had a problem with the standard wastegate actuator hole on the rb25/vg30 turbos. When combined with a decent dump pipe (not like the stadnard one), I've never had problems, even flowing right up to approximately 22-24 psi.

If you're worried about the hole size, it is a very easy modification to enlarge the wastegate hole using a die grinder. Use a hole saw to cut a new wastegate flap which is of the correct size, tack weld the new flap onto the existing flap. Any mechanic should be able to do that for only a few dollars.

bugger about the turbo chris :(

Sweetr33 I have PFC that was tuned to the stock turbs..i have now changed to Z32 afm that richened itup heaps (even though I selected it) - I have added some correction but still richer than before to be safe. No tune as yet..waiting to sort alll this out.

Sounds like I may go the vg30 :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's odd, it works fine here. Try loading it on a different device or browser? It's Jack Phillips JDM, a Skyline wrecker in Victoria. Not the cheapest, but I have found them helpful to find obscure parts in AU. https://jpjdm.com/shop/index.php
    • Yeah. I second all of the above. The only way to see that sort of voltage is if something is generating it as a side effect of being f**ked up. The other thing you could do would be to put a load onto that 30V terminal, something like a brakelamp globe. See if it pulls the voltage away comepletely or if some or all of it stays there while loaded. Will give you something of an idea about how much danger it could cause.
    • I would say, you've got one hell of an underlying issue there. You're saying, coils were fully unplugged, and the fuse to that circuit was unplugged, and you measured 30v? Either something is giving you some WILD EMI, and that's an induced voltage, OR something is managing to backfeed, AND that something has problems. It could be something like the ECU if it takes power from there, and also gets power from another source IF there's an internal issue in the ECU. The way to check would be pull that fuse, unplug the coils, and then probe the ECU pins. However it could be something else doing it. Additionally, if it is something wired in, and that something is pulsing, IE a PWM circuit and it's an inductive load and doesnt have proper flyback protection, that would also do it. A possibility would be if you have something like a PWM fuel pump, it might be giving flyback voltages (dangerous to stuff!). I'd put the circuit back into its "broken" state, confirm the weird voltage is back, and then one by one unplug devices until that voltage disappears. That's a quick way to find an associated device. Otherwise I'd need to look at the wiring diagrams, and then understand any electrical mods done.   But you really should not be seeing the above issue, and really, it's indicating something is failing, and possibly why the fuse blew to begin with.
    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
×
×
  • Create New...