Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Have an R33 GTR - mods of note running a PowerFC and bigger injectors. Previously tuned and hasn't missed a beat.

Haven't driven car for about a month and the battery died. It was replaced with a new one, and is now cranking and not firing.

The following things have been checked out as okay:

- crank angle sensor

- plugs (not fouled & clean)

- fuel supply (pump, lines etc)

- spark is good (coilpacks, etc)

- AFM (no dry circuits, etc)

However threw on a noid and there's no injector pulse. Any reasons why this would happen or what I can do to get it going? Thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/179579-r33-gtr-no-injector-pulse/
Share on other sites

How did you test the crank angle sensor? The crank angle sensor has two outputs one for spark and one for injector. I had the same problem i had spark but didnt have injector pulse, i then assumed i had spark then the crank angle would be fine so i went about testing the injection/wiring side of things. After pulling my hair out for a couple days i was led back to the crank angle after we used a friends scan tool. I changed it for a known good one and it instantly fired up and ran fine. Ryan

With the scan tool we noticed we didnt have a signal coming back from the crank angle for injectors but spark was fine. Without the scan tool im not sure how you could test the sensor. I ended up using a an rb20 one from memory and it worked fine.

Edited by Ryan1200
How did you test the crank angle sensor? The crank angle sensor has two outputs one for spark and one for injector. I had the same problem i had spark but didnt have injector pulse, i then assumed i had spark then the crank angle would be fine so i went about testing the injection/wiring side of things. After pulling my hair out for a couple days i was led back to the crank angle after we used a friends scan tool. I changed it for a known good one and it instantly fired up and ran fine. Ryan

no it doesnt lol. it sends rpm and no.1 cylinder referance to the ecu.

have you got power at the injectors? one of the 2 wires should have around 9 volts. (after going thru the resistor near the fuse box)

if there is no power at either then you need to check the resistor or a fuse.

if you do then the ecu isnt getting a signal that the engoine is spinning. ie crank angle.

does the fuel pump turn on when you crank it?

With the scan tool we noticed we didnt have a signal coming back from the crank angle for injectors but spark was fine. Without the scan tool im not sure how you could test the sensor. I ended up using a an rb20 one from memory and it worked fine.

the crank angle sends a signal to the ecu that its turning,and where abouts number 1 piston is. the ecu does all the spark/fueling control. just so you understand whats going on.

have you got power at the injectors? one of the 2 wires should have around 9 volts. (after going thru the resistor near the fuse box)

if there is no power at either then you need to check the resistor or a fuse.

if you do then the ecu isnt getting a signal that the engoine is spinning. ie crank angle.

does the fuel pump turn on when you crank it?

Hi Dave,

Yep there's power to the injectors, but the pulse is very very weak.

Fuel pump turns on, primes, no problems there.

Dave any idea why i had spark fine but no injector. I assumed (1st rule never assume) the CAS had two outputs and were not getting injector signal. Once i changed the CAS problem was solved. Strange

very odd. as the cas has nothing to do with the physical conection to the injectors or spark. (its not like a dissy) it tells the ecu how fast the engine is spinning and where in the 720 degree engine cycle where number 1 is so yhe ecu knows where to spark and fire the injectors.

did you replace it or a workshop?

  • 10 years later...
On 09/08/2007 at 7:14 PM, Candy said:

Solved.

Traced back to a short in the ECU loom harness. Replaced plugs too and she's apples.

Thanks for your help!

I know this is really old but is there a place you pinpointed the fault to??

11 year thread bump, nice.

Visually inspect the loom and look for the worst looking place. If I had to guess I would say where it passes from the cabin through the guard and into the engine bay. Or around the exhaust.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey guys I’m chasing a Rb20det complete or bare block need a good running engine as mine has low comp 
    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
    • 95 is just a scam outright. 98 is the real "premium" with all the best detergents and other additive packages, and at least historically, used to be more dense also. 95 is just 91 bargain basement shit with a little extra octane rating. Of course, there's 91 and there's 91 also. I always (back in the 90s early 2000s) refused to put fuel in from supermarket related fuel chains on the basis that it was nasty half arsed shit imported from Indonesia. Nowadays, I suspect that there is little difference between the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the "bargain" chains and the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the big brands, given that most of it is coming from the same SEAsian refineries. Anyway - if there's still anything to that logic, then it would apply to 95 also. 98 is only made in decent refineries and, as I said, is usually the "premium" fuel, both in terms of octane rating and "use this because it's good for your engine because it's got the unicorn jizz in it!".
×
×
  • Create New...