Jump to content
SAU Community

R33 Gtr - No Injector Pulse


Candy
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Have an R33 GTR - mods of note running a PowerFC and bigger injectors. Previously tuned and hasn't missed a beat.

Haven't driven car for about a month and the battery died. It was replaced with a new one, and is now cranking and not firing.

The following things have been checked out as okay:

- crank angle sensor

- plugs (not fouled & clean)

- fuel supply (pump, lines etc)

- spark is good (coilpacks, etc)

- AFM (no dry circuits, etc)

However threw on a noid and there's no injector pulse. Any reasons why this would happen or what I can do to get it going? Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How did you test the crank angle sensor? The crank angle sensor has two outputs one for spark and one for injector. I had the same problem i had spark but didnt have injector pulse, i then assumed i had spark then the crank angle would be fine so i went about testing the injection/wiring side of things. After pulling my hair out for a couple days i was led back to the crank angle after we used a friends scan tool. I changed it for a known good one and it instantly fired up and ran fine. Ryan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that could possibly be my problem i thought the crank angle sensor only timed spark, how can i test for injector pulse, i know my injectors are ok cos i put 12v across them and they click open, but when cranking i dont get any fuel into the cylinders but i have spark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the scan tool we noticed we didnt have a signal coming back from the crank angle for injectors but spark was fine. Without the scan tool im not sure how you could test the sensor. I ended up using a an rb20 one from memory and it worked fine.

Edited by Ryan1200
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How did you test the crank angle sensor? The crank angle sensor has two outputs one for spark and one for injector. I had the same problem i had spark but didnt have injector pulse, i then assumed i had spark then the crank angle would be fine so i went about testing the injection/wiring side of things. After pulling my hair out for a couple days i was led back to the crank angle after we used a friends scan tool. I changed it for a known good one and it instantly fired up and ran fine. Ryan

no it doesnt lol. it sends rpm and no.1 cylinder referance to the ecu.

have you got power at the injectors? one of the 2 wires should have around 9 volts. (after going thru the resistor near the fuse box)

if there is no power at either then you need to check the resistor or a fuse.

if you do then the ecu isnt getting a signal that the engoine is spinning. ie crank angle.

does the fuel pump turn on when you crank it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the scan tool we noticed we didnt have a signal coming back from the crank angle for injectors but spark was fine. Without the scan tool im not sure how you could test the sensor. I ended up using a an rb20 one from memory and it worked fine.

the crank angle sends a signal to the ecu that its turning,and where abouts number 1 piston is. the ecu does all the spark/fueling control. just so you understand whats going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

have you got power at the injectors? one of the 2 wires should have around 9 volts. (after going thru the resistor near the fuse box)

if there is no power at either then you need to check the resistor or a fuse.

if you do then the ecu isnt getting a signal that the engoine is spinning. ie crank angle.

does the fuel pump turn on when you crank it?

Hi Dave,

Yep there's power to the injectors, but the pulse is very very weak.

Fuel pump turns on, primes, no problems there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dave any idea why i had spark fine but no injector. I assumed (1st rule never assume) the CAS had two outputs and were not getting injector signal. Once i changed the CAS problem was solved. Strange

very odd. as the cas has nothing to do with the physical conection to the injectors or spark. (its not like a dissy) it tells the ecu how fast the engine is spinning and where in the 720 degree engine cycle where number 1 is so yhe ecu knows where to spark and fire the injectors.

did you replace it or a workshop?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 years later...
On 09/08/2007 at 7:14 PM, Candy said:

Solved.

Traced back to a short in the ECU loom harness. Replaced plugs too and she's apples.

Thanks for your help!

I know this is really old but is there a place you pinpointed the fault to??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...