Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

When I have time, i always use a die grinder and smooth out the flow path inside thte housings. The exhaust housining is the main one that needs it. You'll notice all these random casting dags inside and obstructions everywhere.

You can go as far as port matching everything - manifolds etc.

Using extrusion honing takes it to the next level, but I have noticed really good gains doing it by hand with a die grinder.

I recently port matched my Gt30 .82 IW.

Origionally it was absolutely shocking. ~5mm overhang each side of the flange. I would hate to imagine what that would do to the exhaust gas flowing out of the exh. manifold and smack in to it.

While I was there it took 5mins to port match the exhaust manifold; the turbine housing took a good few hours to get it all good.

I have a carbide bur and found it easier to port match with a few packs of supercrap grinding stones on the end of a drill.. The exh manifold and turbine housing are both quite soft metal and comes off smoothly without much effort when using the grinding stones.

The carbide bur results in a messy 'looking' port; I found it difficult not to have a wavey affect using the carbide bur as it takes off so much metal too easily. :nyaanyaa:

The head to exh. manifold port match was terrible; the t3 outlet on the exh manifold was pretty close to spot on.

I wasn't able to get in and smooth out the flow to the wastegate but it did feel fairly smooth. The leading edge could have definitely had a bit of meat taken out to aid flow in to the wastegate.

Here's the pic.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&id=107723

As for powerporting the blokes over on calaisturbo.com have been doing this with great results. I'll consider it at a later date to chase up to another 30-40hp.

Running super rich with conservative ignition I've seen 6000rpm in third with no knock and boost held nicely on 14pounds. So the std flap appears to be holding boost quite well. :thumbsup:

Through port matching, and general cleanup of the housings/manifolds/exhaust (manually), I've noticed more power and response. The results have been visible on the dyno.

Yes, I hear you say dyno test was done on different days, but after doing a number of tests, you get a idea of the general range the results are. After the grinding, the results were a fair bit higher.

With a stock car, doing this mgiht not yield much results. But when you hvae a car pumping out 22-24 psi on a gcg highflow, you can imagine it making a fair whack of difference.

ive just purchased a hks gt-rs kit, so im assuming they are pretty good straight out of the box.

However i have a mate that got it done on his garrett gt3071r in his datson 1600 with fj20 and got 24rwkw extra on the same boost. This was at 20psi so like you said MANWHORE at this level of boost there would be gains. im only looking at 240rwkw on my r34 gtt neo with about 15-16psi so probably wont notice it

Hi Cubes , it may be interesting to have a look at some of Garretts data on T3 flanges and port dimensions . You may find that the Nissan "T3" flanged exhaust manifold is actually split or twin entry T3 flange size . I think its logical that split T3 flange ports would be slightly wider because the divider takes up some space .

Cheers A .

Interesting to note Disco.

The hole wasn't central on the flange either. Thats what led me to believe something was a little fishy. :S

Another thing thats interesting is the T3 inlet of the std turbo was the same size as genuine and aftermarket gaskets.

Bass, extrude honing is one thing. I think of it more like a final get the last little bit extra.

Port matching is the main thing you'd want to be looking at. Port matching woujld me measuring up the turbo and how it mates with the manifold, how the turbo mates with the dump, how the dump mates with the front pipe etc etc you get the idea.

Then, you take to it with a die grinder to match the ports. While you're at it, you can also clean out any casting dags/uneven surfaces that you can reach with the grinder.

This has huge gains compared with the extrusion honing. I'd the the extrusion honing after I do the port matching. Extrude honing will take care of that tiny bit extra that your'e lookign for after

There was a thread a little while back where Sly33?? had his exh. std. manifold extrude honed. Flow was picked up and evened quite a bit. BUT if it shows as real world resuts has yet to be seen.

When extrude honing first they port match and then they begin playing with the goo.

Being port matchedinitially 'possibly' may reduce the cost of extrude process a touch.

UAS do extrude honing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So the original radiator is leaking now. Looking at getting a fully aluminium one next. Am I correct in saying that the Series 2 Auto Stageas have a separate trans cooler from factory (located in between the rad and intercooler in my previous post/message).   Currently looking at Fenix $460, Blitz $700, GReddy $800, and KoyoRad $740. What are everyones thought on Fenix ( ive read a few comments saying theyre cheap Chinese rebrands etc and how their build quality is... well.. chinese...)  compared to the others? Worth the extra couple hundies?
    • Man, different parts but the same numbers is terrible @dbm7! And it doesn't help that most online shops don't list the part numbers at all. They just give a list of compatible models...
    • Slow when hot could also be because its getting more dynamic compression, OR things are getting a bit tighter once it is all expanded. If it were an earthing issue, typically I'd expect you to have it have issues all the time. Unless it's really a combination of both things. Where the higher compression, and things being a bit tighter, is giving that bit of extra load and you do need a slight clean up on the cables/connections.
    • Yeah, this is one of the most annoying things about nissan part numbers... I've got an unrelated example... Image is of the AT output shaft ~ they have the same part#, but clearly the shaft on the left is beefier design to that on the right ...the difference (essentially) is the 'lighter' shaft on the right, is for engines up to RB25DE (this includes RB20 variants) : the shaft on the left is for RB25/26DET(T)....are they interchangeable? Yes...but obviously one shaft is going to be stronger than the other...and, the lighter shaft is around USD115, but the heavier shaft closer to USD150...same part#... ...epc-data usually tells a tale ~ the amayama listing for 39100-23U60 has a note "Longest side is between 60 and 105 cm" ; no such info is there for 39100-23U70 ...and given the great disparity in price between the 2 parts, it makes me at least curious (to the point of caution) where the 'extra money' went? ...ie; these 2 parts have a cost difference that (to myself at least) isn't explained by 'plastic boot'...ie; with amayama there's AUD700 price difference ...plastic versus rubber?...I'm not seeing it like that...and 60cm ~ 105cm...??...that's a huge disparity....something hinky going on here... I'd try searching by VIN, not model... /2cents
×
×
  • Create New...