Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

After looking at the ignition dwell duty table values. I googled for the conversion from dec to milliseconds, and discovered a few differing methods that yeld some very different results.

firstly there are 32 (RPM) points in the table, some believe that these are in 400 rpm blocks thus going from 400-12800 rpm (seems unlikely). 200 rpm intervals seem more likely eg. 200-6400 rpm.

next the dec values I imagine have a conversion value to convert them to a percentage, two variations on this one.

1. divide by 10

2. multiply by .33

I favor the option 1, but could be wrong.

Now to convert dwell duty percentage into milliseconds.

I used this method (1/(RPM) X 6000) X Duty % (in decimal).

This gives me a peak of around 4 ms at 200 rpm and an average value of around 2 ms for the rest of the table.

Am I on the right track with this one?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/180258-z32-igniton-dwell-duty/
Share on other sites

Looking at the Z32 ECU I have tried to come up with a conversion table to ms and came up with zip! I have tried longer dwell on standard coils and had better burn and more torque but prone to detonation and shorter dwell and less prone to detonation but guaranteed way to fry coils.

From what I have gathered there is 2 increments per RPM scale and they seem to differ. by best guess would be use the RPM scale as a guide and devide each increment by 2 for your 32 points.

As for dwell values there was a table somewhere I will have a look and see if i can dig it up. but the results were a bit shady. there was actually a brand of coild called FET. and they gave specifications that indicate they were designed for a min of 2ms and no less.

sorry can't be much help :)

there are numbers of GTR's in japan making 800ps with standard coils so they know something we dont...

high on painkillers right now sorry if my explination is not the best...

Here is a table of values using data at 7B60 tp 7B7F.

200 Rpm - 4.50 ms

400 Rpm - 2.25 ms

600 Rpm - 2.20 ms

800 Rpm - 2.40 ms

1000 Rpm - 2.52 ms

1200 Rpm - 2.60 ms

1400 Rpm - 2.57 ms

1600 Rpm - 2.66 ms

1800 Rpm - 2.70 ms

2000 Rpm - 2.82 ms

2200 Rpm - 2.84 ms

2400 Rpm - 2.90 ms

2600 Rpm - 2.91 ms

2800 Rpm - 2.98 ms

3000 Rpm - 3.02 ms

3200 Rpm - 3.04 ms

3400 Rpm - 3.07 ms

3600 Rpm - 2.98 ms

3800 Rpm - 2.91 ms

4000 Rpm - 2.82 ms

4200 Rpm - 2.83 ms

4400 Rpm - 2.84 ms

4600 Rpm - 2.84 ms

4800 Rpm - 2.85 ms

5000 Rpm - 2.80 ms

5200 Rpm - 2.69 ms

5400 Rpm - 2.59 ms

5600 Rpm - 2.50 ms

5800 Rpm - 2.41 ms

6000 Rpm - 2.33 ms

6200 Rpm - 2.25 ms

6400 Rpm - 2.18 ms

Seems to fit in with CEF11E info on the coils.

Maybe someone has measured dwell in ms at any of these points and can confirm if this correct.

I made it.

Took the values in the igniton dwell duty table, Converted them into dec.

Divided them by 10 (Conversion in to Dwell Duty %).

Then applied this formula ((1/RPM) x 60000) x Dwell Duty % (as decimal).

I scaled each of the addresses as 200 RPM Intervals.

eg. 32 addresses = 200 - 6400 rpm.

EXAMPLE:

Value at 7B60 is 0F or 15 dec.

15/10 = 1.5

((1/200) x 60000) x 0.015

(300) x 0.015 = 4.5 ms.

This is how I got those values in the table, still not sure if it is 100% accurate.

It would be good if someone has measured the dwell time at a few of these points to prove or disprove this method.

The other option of scaling the table in 400 rpm (400-12800 rpm) intervals is still possible, with smaller values.

Somewhere around 1 millisecond lower at a guess.

Just thought i'd add that the reason behind all this is that I plan to use LS1 coils in the future if my Ser 2 coils give out.

I'll probably increase the dwell for these as i've heard that they are a little slow and need around 3-4.5 ms of dwell.

its an iduuctive coil. around 2mh. the norm is the higher the inductance the longer the dwell needed. the longer the better. but the longer it is the more heat is generated in the coil and driver.

generally to get a very good spark around 3-4ms is nominal. 2ms would be at tyhe very bottom of the scale without having to close down the gap.

ive been playing around with differant coil for my cdi set up. and found tha a mitsubishi gto coil pack is no good. cos its got an inductance of 6mh. where as my mazda coil are only 3mh. so they need half the charging time.

you need to workout how many ms are available at full rpm.

I believe that those numbers are too high, when you put those sort of dwell numbers into an aftermarket computer the stock coils burn out, i was under the impression that the stock system runs about 1.7ms

Edited by Adriano

Okay,

TO4GTR - Maximum dwell duty % would be 25.5 %, That would mean that @ 6400 rpm max coil charge time would be 2.38 ms.

Adriano - The RPM Scale that I am using could be either 200 or 400 rpm i'm not sure which. If I was to use the 400 rpm scale it would give me values about 1 ms lower than those in the table.

NOTE:

Motec recommend a constant 3ms charge time for LS1 coils I hear, when I make the change i'll double check this.

  • 1 month later...

I am fairly new to all of this, but I do have the attached document that seems to show the increments are in 400rpm and the conversion is 1/3% to ms. Using the equation from earlier in the thread for a stock RB20DET ROM I am getting between 1.4 - 2.3 ms of dwell.

090318_1_.pdf

I am fairly new to all of this, but I do have the attached document that seems to show the increments are in 400rpm and the conversion is 1/3% to ms. Using the equation from earlier in the thread for a stock RB20DET ROM I am getting between 1.4 - 2.3 ms of dwell.

This is a dwell table from my wifes 93 z32, vg30dett.

post-536-1191612410_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I also don't mean to rain on your parade. But with a 5-10k budget for road only? I'd want to check confirmation that everything IS working correctly and I'm with @GTSBoy for a plan of action here. I'd be checking subframes, bushes, exhaust hangers, interior bits and generally QOL things and CONFIRMING they are working right before thinking about motor. You can get 250KW+ on stock RB26 hardware by simply removing the built in restrictors and tuning the stock ECU. If you want purity that's as far to take it, which I would be worried to do and won't think the budget would allow for when earnestly checking for 30+ year old car stuff.
    • I specifically said buy new performance car because of the use case here (i.e, no track use and fun livable everything/do it all easily if not especially amazing as a drivers car). Tracking an 80K Skyline and an 80K M2 makes the BMW the obviously more risky purchase WHEN something goes wrong you suddenly can't easily fix it with hand tools and readily available parts that you may have a community of people you know available, or years of your own knowledge on the platform to apply. There's reasons you see Hondas and Vettes and RB's and Miatas and such at tracks, you can easily hand-tool repair 99.9% of it in a shed, usually with the tools and the skillset of the owner to apply to it. An i30N is not going to beat a R chassis unless it's got massive problems either. The old cars can, and still do work great. The problem is - and always has been - social media would have you believe it's simple and easy to achieve the results you see online.  People want their car to be like "one of those cool JDM cars" which is the default image people have when they think of  "cool JDM cars" You are paying 25 years of catchup R&D to achieve. Or the knowledge somebody else has to do it for you, which is big dollar restomod stuff.  The bar has been moved and every R chassis that people see/like/enjoy has 25 years of R&D thrown at it, or is owned by someone who did all that work and has that knowledge over the past 25 years. All the survivors have been progressively resto-modded the entire time. OR you slowly bring it back to how it was stock. Which is also prohibitively expensive, done for the love of it. This is what the JDM community is now. This is fine, but "Where do I start?" is either: 1) Don't 2) Take your own slow journey but you cannot compare your progress with others who have had 25 years of R&D and experience building their own cars unless you pay for it.
    • Yep, with the crazy inflation of the value of our cars these past couple of years this became a problem for me too... My solution is to transition to bikes. Everything feels so cheap compared to tracking the skyline lol
    • So, I've been a little busy on this car. I replaced the bonnet struts which is always satisfying but very confusing that nobody else on the planet seems to do this. Its just my routine first thing I do on any car I buy. The boot struts for both the tailgate and the separately opening glass window was a bastard. And, I found a fair bit of rust in the strut cavity. I filled it with rust converter and cleaned up as much of the dirt as I could. There was so much dirt. One piece of the trim was barely hanging on and so I've left it off. I'll try to get a replacement. You can see how disgusting and dirty it all was in this thread; I had to remove the little clips that hold the struts on the ball. The ones I took off had no clips and it was impossible to get them on with them in place. Fingers crossed they stay put. So, I turned my attention to the headlights, they were in a bad way and likely would stop rego. I took the headlights out and found the adjusters were all just loose. So, I fixed those and unclipped the lenses to clean them up. Couldn't believe how easy it was to take all this apart compared to the E90.   I also cleaned up the stockies which was awesome, these are super cool with lug nut covers. They're in good nic but the tyres are shot. I was going to use these for rego but in the end got a fresh pair of rubber for the 17's on the front of the car instead. The front bar of this car is from a late(r) model one. I don't think it's quite LCI but who knows. I'll need to find out. Anyway, the bar was missing the fog lights and the wiring and plugs were for the original ones so I got new plugs and some cheap fogs. I wasn't sure if missing original equipment would hamper my blue slip attempts. Had a couple of these little fellas helping out. But not Ben who got stuck behind the pool heater .... How embarressment.  I ordered new speed sensors for all corners because I knew one was out. I just got cheapies and will replace them with Bosch items when I can find Bosch items. Again, this was just for rego. Alas, it seems the blue speed sensors are not the same as the grey ones. Back they went and replacements ordered. In the end, with my new scan tool, it was just rear left that was shot. Replaced it and cleared the codes. All good now. Lastly, my aux (thermo) fan is being a bit odd. Its powering up at strange times and NOT powering up when I think it should (100C). While this can be caused by a few things, the most likely (for me) is the ambient temp sensor. Given mine reads -40.0C regardless of the temp, I figured it would be good to replace it. In the end, the sensor wiring was abysmal with (terrible) attempts made by somebody to fix it.   I fixed this all up but the sensor is only attached using pins into the wires. The plug is not there. Despite trying and trying to connect it securely it wouldn't work so a replacement sensor and plug is on the way. Oh, I also ordered a replacement piece of trim for the part missing here at the bottom. Ordered from Latvia for $70 delivered. I took a bit of a leap of faith because I didn't have the exact part number and, as usual, there were eleventy billion pieces of trim that looked to fit. Nailed it. Well, its not totally perfect but I think its more a 28 y/o car problem than a trim problem. And, as of today ..... I have bought the workshop manuals 2nd hand off a guy in tassie. 1000+ pages of E39 goodness, hopefully it helps me with the fan. I also have a new temp switch on the way incase its the problem. Stoked.
    • I don't even know that you want an M2 Competition as a track car. My rule for a track car is only risk as much as you're willing to completely total out. Clean stock C5 Z06 Corvettes out here are cheap. Buying someone else's already ruined track car is even cheaper. Maybe I'm just not that good a driver but even a Fiesta ST on the Nordschleife felt like as much car as I could realistically handle.
×
×
  • Create New...