Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

wow! that would have to be close to the most innacurate article on GTRs I've ever read. also it uses a 3 year old CG image of the next gen skyline in an article that doesn't even mention it? weird.

also it uses a 3 year old CG image of the next gen skyline in an article that doesn't even mention it? weird.

Thats a promotional pic of the GT-R Proto Richard... ;)

post-4816-1187939647_thumb.jpg

for the record, mitsubishi and subaru dont come anywhere near close to matching the electronic AWD system. They use mechanical full-time AWD systems that dont use a computer at all, rather just a centre diff that works much like a regular diff but transfers torque between front and rear during slippage. Its basically a system that allows for 2 different torque splits, not infinitely variable torque split like ATTESA.

but yes the article is a bit more marketing hype than actual facts. There was a few facts in there, concerning the skyline's dominance of the racing scene but to say that other cars like porsche and bmw are only now catching up to the skyline is a bit over the top. even the R34 GTR's technology is getting a bit dated now, but the new one should start a whole new era for the GTR :D

  • 4 weeks later...

^^ The new 997 Turbo has a clutch based torque control to the front wheels as per...

"Featuring PTM (Porsche Traction Management) the new system incorporates a clutch-based system which varies the amount of torque to the front wheels, regardless of wheel slip front and rear. This, according to Porsche, aids traction and the handling by redirecting the torque to control oversteer or understeer, thus resulting in far more neutral handling, as well as greatly improved performance in all weather conditions (as opposed to older AWD system which gave the Turbo stability under hard acceleration)"

Porsche claim 100ms time for to modulate power to the front.

cayenne-PTM2.jpg

Transfer case, hydraulic ram and pivot fork look familiar :bunny:

Edited by GeeTR

Haha i like the 2nd paragraph

which states: By 1996 the 2.0L engine was producing 160hp and the Skyline won more than 50 races in the next 3 years....

Sounds like a badly written Herald article, your brother doesn't live in Auckland or Hamilton does he?

lol took them that long huh.. 997, well, like i said b4, its not outdated if theres nothing better

1986 called and mentioned the Porsche 959. Dunno if they can really copy their own idea.

http://www.autozine.org/technical_school/t...tion_4wd_21.htm

1986 called and mentioned the Porsche 959. Dunno if they can really copy their own idea.

http://www.autozine.org/technical_school/t...tion_4wd_21.htm

Exacty! Nissan copied the idea from Porsche from the beginning! And not just the 4WD system either.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
    • I'm almost at a point where I feel like changing the alternator. Need to check the stuff you mentioned first though.
×
×
  • Create New...