Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Bear with me on this one.

SAFC (Super Air Flow Converter) is a device alot of people take to tune their cars.

it cheap, it's effective and it's better than nothing.

however, I have a question which came to mind during a conversation in another thread about the SAFC II and it having 2 maps.

now.

SAFC (or any other signal bending device like the Jaycar digital fuel adjuster) is wired in between the AFM and the ECU.

the AFM reads the amount of air going in to the engine as it goes past the wire on it, and sends it to the ecu, the ecu then calculates how much fuel is needed for this amount of air according to it's programming from the factory.

Right so far?

As per my example in the other thread

SAFC jumps in between and goes "OMAGOD, bro, I swear ecu bro, der is only "z" amount of air cuming through uleh.. you gotta put less fuel in bro.."

ECU goes "Me so solly.. I put in less fuel"

and that is how you lean out the misture to make more power.

but the thing is.. on the SAFC's, you can only make adjustments against the RPM chart.

on the original blue screen SAFC, it is every 500rpm.

on the newer one I think it's every 250rpm.

right?

if you set your boost to 15 psi, get the SAFC tuned.

the dyno operator runs the car as is on the dyno, gets a power curve plot up and a A:F plot.

then looks at the rpm points across the bottom of the dyno printout and lines it up with the a:f points and makes adjustments on the SAFC to either make it bend the signal to make the ecu think it needs to add more or less fuel (make it richer or leaner)

right?

so what then happens if the owner of the car decides he only wants to run 10 psi during the week.

what happens at the rpm points where the dyno operator has made changes via SAFC?

at 10psi, the amount of air the AFM sees is different at each rpm point as it is when it is running 15psi.

does the safc still send the ecu a signal that has the settings from the tune?

in an example..

before tune

15psi, 5000rpm, AFM reads 300cfm of air, a:f ratio = 10.5:1... tuner plays with SAFC in to trick the ECU it's only 250cfm of air, ecu puts less fuel.

after tune

15psi, 5000rpm, AFM reads 300cfm of air, SAFC bends this to say it's only 250cfm, a:f ratio = 12.0:1

you now have more power.

driver decides to turn the boost down to 10psi

10psi, 5000rpm, AFM reads 200cfm of air.

What happens next?

does the SAFC still bend the signal at that rpm point?

does this cause a lean out?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/181911-safc-and-other-afm-signal-benders/
Share on other sites

i always thought that a safc would change the afr regardless of air flow, i.e your adjusting that point of air flow : 200cfm = 150cfm to the computer causing it to the same thing no matter what the boost pressure?

yeah cos otherwise only turbo cars could have SAFCs...

the safc adds/subtracts a percentage of the current reading of airflow at the rpm points and also taking into account your throttle %. it will still add/trim the tune percentage for that rpm point regardless of the boost pressure.

using you eg.

say at 15psi, 5000rpm, 100%Throttle, you have 300cfm and tune the safc to remove 5% at that point = 285cfm

then at 10psi, 5000rpm, 100%Throttle, you have 200cfm and the tune is unchanged (5%) you get = 190cfm

the ecu then does the rest for what its knows as to how much fuel is needing for 5000rpm, full throttle and 190cfm or 285cfm.

also take into account that you have changed one of the varibles from the original tune so there is no saying that the tune will be exactly right. on the safc2 you can have two maps, you could get one tuned at 15psi and one at 10 psi.

Seems pretty simple to me(hopefully I'm right), its just like a normal tune at a higher boost pressure. All thats changing is the AFM signal to make things leaner. Nothing in your car compensates for the lower boost pressure(AFM voltage will be the same as this is before the turbo) so the car will run richer after it hits peak boost.

Like has been said the SAFC II lets you have two maps, so this could be the answer for you, have one set for say 15psi and one for 10psi so it doesn't run rich at lower boost.

I'm not looking at buying an SAFC or any other bender.

it was from another conversation that I started thinking about this point.

Are we saying the percentage of correction it does is dependant on throttle position?

100% throttle might = 5% correction at 5000rpm but if it senses only 50% throttle it adjust by 2.5% at 5000rpm?

http://www.xspeed.com.au/manuals/Apexi_S-AFC_manual.pdf

Here's the instruction manual for the old one.

There is a high/low map. the cut over point is adjustable and based on throttle position.

I see where you are coming from re the percentage reduction though as you could end up with a lean situation, particularly on something like an r33/s14 with aggressive r&r at the high airflow but not so bad at lower airflow (ie the 15 vs 10psi scenario)

Ideally, you'd have to set it up on the dyno and check it, then try a few runs at lower boost to see what happens, make adjustments accordingly and compromise your high boost tune. Or if you are a nut bag like me, you run the max possible boost all the time (except on the track because you have no fine control of the throttle on corner exit :action-smiley-069: )

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • A few things that seem a bit off here. - why is there 2 BOV’s?  - the turbo smart BOV on the compressor housing, is it turned up ALL the way? I have seen this become an issue on old man Pete’s car. It would push open and recirc, turbo speed would rise and the boost pressure would do weird things. - stock head? Does that include springs? - tried a different MAC valve? Is it plumbed correctly?
    • Photo of manifold showing gate location? I mean, it's 6Boost, so we probably shouldn't be worrying, but always wroth knowing what the layout is. Plumbed back to atmosphere? Or into the dump?
    • Yes correct. Also, I'd avoid applying it to soft paint (however I doubt you'll ever have to deal with it in practice). So any paint that hasn't fully hardened, could be a 1k paint that never fully hardened or it could be a 2k paint that was laid down thick and hasn't yet fully hardened. 
    • Bit of an update to this one. Having some issues on the dyno that held us back (boost spiking) and I want to pass some info over you guys and see what you think is wrong with my setup. The current readout on this dyno is 462rwkw on a low reading dyno so keep in mind it is a real world 500rwkw setup on a hub dyno. Don't read into the power figure too much as a sign of the issue. The short and curly of it is: 2.8 Litre Racepace build RB25 NEO N/A Head with VCT (internally standard however ) Borgwarner EFR 8474  Turbosmart 50mm Straight Gate + Mac valve 6Boost Manifold 4" dump to full 4" exhaust (nil restrictions) Wastegate plumbed back in and all angles in the exhaust system are acceptable and not too sharp. GFB SV52 BOV in cooler piping  Turbosmart BOV in EFR Housing   The issue we are having is it comes onto full boost for example at 4000rpm and spikes to 24/25psi, before dropping down to 17psi before slowly rising back up to the target boost of 23psi. It was extremely uncontrollable and the tuner actually had to ramp in boost progrssively with each 1000rpm on each boost setting we selected to try and reduce the amount of spiking. Sometimes we would see a drop of 10psi from the peak at the beginning of the run, to the low, until it took the next 500-1000rpm to stabilise back up to the target boost. The tuner is pretty confident that the straight gate is just a poorly designed product and leaks too much boost upon cracking the gate open and theres no way to fix it other than going to a poppet valve. He's also confient theres no ignition breakdown or floating valves. The fueling is extremely stable as well. Turbo speed is somewhere around the 109,000rpm area. The spanner in the works for me is that prior to this Borgwarner and StraightGate, the car was tuned on -5 twins at a diferent tuner, and he also had issues controlling the boost with it spiking around the same rpm range, so to me this sounds like the same issue and it can't be anything on the turbo side as this was all changed and I think the behaviour is extremely similar, if not the same. We also removed the mac valve and did a run on wastegate pressure and it still spiked and had the same behaviour. My thoughts on possibilities are: Boost Leak VCT Cam Gear isn't reliably activating consistently - (On this however, we did a run with the VCT disabled and the boost still spiked) Turbosmart BOV is not handling the boost? However this seems unlikely to not be able to handle 20psi. I have a couple of logs that I can't make sense of if anybody knows how to read them and can obtain further logs of other parameters if they are not enough, happy to pay for anyones time. The dyno readout with the power figure is the most recent last week. The other picture is from two weeks prior to that where we couldn't break 400kw (we removed the cat), however the issue of the boost control persisted. @Lithium @Piggaz @burn4005 @GTSBoy @discopotato03 I've tagged those that were quite active in recent pages here, no disrespect to those that know turbos well but I missed tagging. Cheers 
×
×
  • Create New...