Jump to content
SAU Community

350rwkw+ GTT VS GTR  

95 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

As for those who reckon a MRS or MX5 is a hairdressers car, you either have never driven one or you don't know how to drive thus can not appreciate the great handling balance these cars can offer.

I've driven one. Slow but handled well.

Its still a hairdressers car. :glare:

--

With regards to the question.

The GTR is great; lots of grip and is very quick with lots of power. BUT would that not get boaring?

A GTT punching out a reasonable amount of power has less grip and would require a lot of work, thinking and driving to make the setup quick. But would that get a little tiring?

I think I'd almost rather the challenge of getting the car setup better, improving my skills etc.

If I were to push 400rwkw odd I think yes.. I probably would look at the GTR as 400rwkw through the GTST become a little frustrating as it attempts to wag its tail at 160km/h+ in a straight line.

IF I were to push any more than 300rwkw I would most definitely look at dropping the 3ltr in to it. The smaller motors simply lack the spool capability for the big turbo's; as a result become very peak and lack that mid range fun that makes a car feel quick.

Who wants a car that doesn't get up and go until 3rd+ gear? Not me.

After all its all about the driving experience right?

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

After all its all about the driving experience right?

:glare: Yep, that's what it's about.

Really, it comes down to the application the car is being put to. If you have a bent for circuit work, drags, sporting road driving, hill climb, or motorkhana, there is a difference of priorities.

The relative lack of power in those naturally aspirated rear engined hairdressers cars, combined with the sort of grip and chassis balance they offer is what can make them shine in certain situations. But for most use, the 2wd Skyline has a certain appeal and suits my purposes. Given more $$ available, I'd probably have more than one car in the shed.

  • 4 weeks later...

I've driven one. Slow but handled well.

Its still a hairdressers car. :D

Haha...I so agree. I sold my 33 gtst for a mr-s 2 years ago and the car sucks balls. Totally slow ass...and not true that it does not break down. i found my r33 less rattly than the mr-s. not to mention you can only take one passenger. May as well a motor bike.

But mr-s is a pretty car though...just like hairdressers

Too pretty that I had to get rid of it....glad I did

None the least, GTR 34 is still the way to go. Gtt is always gtt even with 1000hp. But then again, if you had the money for a gtr 34. Why not go for a evo 7 8 or 9. So much newer and cheaper for a awd turbo beast.

What do you guys think.

None the least, GTR 34 is still the way to go. Gtt is always gtt even with 1000hp. But then again, if you had the money for a gtr 34. Why not go for a evo 7 8 or 9. So much newer and cheaper for a awd turbo beast.

What do you guys think.

RAWR!!! :thumbsup: omg this is a SKYLINE forum... not little 4 cyclinder evo chit chat forum lol!!! Evo is just a lancer wif a turbo/d engine lol rebadge crap...

:woot:

GTR FTW :ph34r:

do you know anything?

the only thing the evo lancer shares with the lancer is the name and the emblem on the dash

oviously apperance doesnt mean anyfing?? LAWL its not like u can dress a car to look like a skyline

i seen $9k lancers that are wanna be EVO's

man lancers are lancers = 4 cylinders are WEAK, nothing @ the top

just like the WRX

all they got good going for em is there CHEAP new/er 4x4 turbo family car LOL :laughing-smiley-014:

once again , i ask you, do you have a clue?

not one person here has said to dress up an evo like a skyline so im not sure what your angle is

a 9k lancer is basically a lancer with a body kit

i think its missing the 4wd drivetrain, the brembo brakes, the interior, the chassis differences, engine differences, turbocharged and computer / mivec differences

saying lancers are 4cyl weak is fine if thats what you believe, but check out the world rally classes, its locked to 2 litre which is where the evo and wrx come in

so WEAK means nothing, other than you looking like a fool, go tell the ralliart team the torque they make at 2000rpm is WEAK, it will beat more than your skyline makes

nothing @ top is all dependant on what you want to do and how much power you want, is 800hp enough?

dude if u think the gtr is easy to drive around think again.. loads of grip??? yer when ur going straight.. dont forget the fronts only work when the rears give up and u have the steering wheel resonably straight..

if it kicks out wildly, the fronts wont be comin on very strong at all... b4 my recent buy into the GTR world.. i owned a 350rwkw+ rx7 s5... it was lightning fast and had brakes to match, not to mention its ability to take any corner on, but when ur comin around a bend and the rear end steps out.. nothing is scarier than the GTR... its chassis is so unpredictable.. 1 mistake and ull kill urself because of it.

Sliding/driftin is alot of fun.. but not when uve got torque steer @ the same time that ur tryin to correct it.. its pretty fkn wild... trust me. ive owned quite a few faster cars than my GTR, but non r as wild :thumbsup:

mate.. ur fk'd aye!

go and buy a evo.. and fkn join a lancer forum FFS

>< OMG and noooo what point are u trying to prove

lawl yaya wow they got name brand parts :woot: there still a CHEAP car... and say wat u want they look like the other lancers rolling around...

lancers are girls cars

dispite the branded badge gear it beholds

>< since when has the $30-40k lancer wait 'EVO haha' been a RALLY car? dnt tell me them adverts actually make u think ur getting a RACE CAR

:thumbsup:

:laughing-smiley-014:

enuff said

omg SIGH!!!

well i aint here to argue wif ppl lol bout personal opinions haha

LAWL gd luck with ya evo's n that

P.S

join this forum ... we got some fan boys here :laughing-smiley-014:

http://gsr-evo-club.net/forum/

u do realise that the evo gets from 0-100 about 2 seconds faster than ur shitbox right???

and im also sure that u know, it'll take the 1/4mile down in low 13's???

can ur shitbox lift the back wheel, WHILE ur braking AND turning at the same time??? no??

wait.. maybe ur shitbox has 4k worth of brakes?? oh wait.. its a gtst.. ur brakes r worth 400...

what about ur chassis?? wins races??? oh i guess not... maybe ur car was worth 80k brand new?? wrong again.. lol

does ur car even have a name for itself apart from modernised Gemini?? no.. it doesnt. get a real car champ and stop playin with lil toys :thumbsup:

u do realise that the evo gets from 0-100 about 2 seconds faster than ur shitbox right???

and im also sure that u know, it'll take the 1/4mile down in low 13's???

can ur shitbox lift the back wheel, WHILE ur braking AND turning at the same time??? no??

wait.. maybe ur shitbox has 4k worth of brakes?? oh wait.. its a gtst.. ur brakes r worth 400...

what about ur chassis?? wins races??? oh i guess not... maybe ur car was worth 80k brand new?? wrong again.. lol

does ur car even have a name for itself apart from modernised Gemini?? no.. it doesnt. get a real car champ and stop playin with lil toys :ph34r:

gee put us rb25 owners down why dont ya :woot:

meh...as long as it drifts its all good :thumbsup:

evo 7 you could get for 30k reasonably

evo 8's are around 40k for a reasonale model

evo 7 - 33k

http://www.j-spec.com.au/list/index.php?ID=11032

evo 7 - 27k

http://www.j-spec.com.au/list/index.php?ID=11026

im still not sure on your angle. yes we all agree its a skyline forum but your acting like a knob, if you dont like the car then thats ok, you dont have to

but going on that its a wog car or a little kids car makes no sense. yeah cos no skyline owners fit atmo bovs and bling bling wanker rims

the purpose of the evo lancer, much like the wrx is a homogonated (spelling?) model so they can complete in rally competition

the rules of rally state you must run a production class car and it must be a 2 litre

so you build a rally car, make some changes to suit street spec and sell it. this allows you to run in rally class and make a few bucks to cover the R&D

this is what subaru have done with the wrx (world rally experiment) and the evolution lancer, they both exist for rally purposes

I'm with Paul.

I really didn't think much of the EVO lancers until I met Jack monkhouse out cruising around one night.

He has a new blue evo that sounds absolutely tough as; it has HEAPS of low mid range and not the typical fart 4 banger note; the note was very pleasant to hear. It was apparently making around 200awkw.

Hearing that thing cruise around with how much low/mid range it had impressed the hell out of me. A very flexible package.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah. For something like boost control I wouldn't start my design with PID. I'd go with something that originates in the fuzzy logic world and use an emergency function or similar concept. PID can and does work, but at its fundamental level it is not suited to quick action. I'd be reasonably sure that the Profecs et al all transitioned to a fuzzy algorithm back in the 90s. Keep in mind also that where and when I have previously talked about using a Profec, I'm usually talking about only doing an open loop system anyway. All this talk of PID and other algorithms only comes into play when you're talking closed loop boost control, and in the context of what the OP needs and wants, we're probably actually in the realm of open loop anyway. Closed loop boost control has always bothered me, because if you sense the process value (ie the boost measurement that you want to control) in the plenum (after the throttle), then boost control to achieve a target is only desirable at WOT. When you are not WOT, you do not want the the boost to be as high as it can be (ie 100% of target). That's why you do not have the throttle at WO. You're attempting to not go as fast as you can. If the process variable is measured upstream of the throttle (ie in an RB26 plenum, or the cold side pipework in others) then yeah, sure, run the boost controller closed loop to hit a target boost there, and then the throttle does what it is supposed to do. Just for utter clarity.... an old Profec B Spec II (or whatever it is called, and I've got one, and I never look at it, so I can't remember!) and similar might have a MAP sensor, and it might show you the actual boost in the plenum (when the MAP sensor is connected to the plenum) but it does not use that value to decide what it is doing to control the boost, except to control the gating effect (where it stops holding the gate closed on the boost ramp). It's not closed loop at all. Once the gate is released, it's just the solenoid flailing away at whatever duty cycle was configured when it was set up. I'm sure that there are many people who do not understand the above points and wonder wtf is going on.  
    • This has clearly gone off on quite a tangent but the suggestion was "go standalone because you probably aren't going to stop at just exhaust + a mild tune and manual boost controller", not "buy a standalone purely for a boost controller". If the scope does in fact stop creeping at an EBC then sure, buy an EVC7 or Profec or whatever else people like to run and stop there. And I have yet to see any kind of aftermarket boost control that is more complicated than a PID controller with some accounting for edge cases. Control system theory is an incredibly vast field yet somehow we always end up back at some variant of a PID controller, maybe with some work done to linearize things. I have done quite a lot, but I don't care to indulge in those pissing matches, hence posting primary sources. I deal with people quite frequently that scream and shout about how their opinion matters more because they've shipped more x or y, it doesn't change the reality of the data they're trying to disagree with. Arguing that the source material is wrong is an entirely separate point and while my experience obviously doesn't matter here I've rarely seen factory service manuals be incorrect about something. It's not some random poorly documented internal software tool that is constantly being patched to barely work. It's also not that hard to just read the Japanese and double check translations either. Especially in automotive parts most of it is loanwords anyways.
    • If you are keeping the current calipers you need to keep the current disc as the spacing of the caliper determines the disc diameter. Have you trial fitted the GTS brakes fit on a GTSt hub or is this forward planning? There could be differences in caliper mount spacing, backing plate and even hub shape that could cause an issue.
    • Hi there I have a r33 gts with 4 stud small brakes, I'm going to convert to 5 stud but keep the small brakes, what size rotor would I need?
    • First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
×
×
  • Create New...