Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

have a set of hollow 19inch axis rims imported from japan, 90% tread left on all 4. paid $3400 from japan. open to offers! over $1800

untitledai6.png

Axis Reverb - Five spokes and a polished lip hold a lightweight surprise on the Axis Reverb - hollow spoke technology. The Reverb uses a unique casting process that makes each spoke hollow resulting in a lightweight yet very strong wheel. The Reverb comes in sizes for many of today's popular compact front wheel drive cars from 17 and 18 inches, and in staggered sizing for Nissan 350Z, Infiniti G35 Coupe, Lexus SC and GS, Mazda RX7 and RX8 and Toyota Supra. Fitments for cars with factory Brembo brakes like the STi, G35 and 350Z assure a perfect fit over large brakes. Suitable for track use, the Axis 350Z race car uses Reverbs in an 18x9.5 front and 18x10.5 staggered fitment.

Read how Edmunds.com built a Cobra Killer of a Mustang GT and used a set of Reverbs for their light weight and high strength.

Edited by r33gtst-ser2

mate when i look at the picture, and the rims on my car, they look exac the same. but not 100% all i know is they cost me $3500 when i got it from the car dealer, and he got them from japan. tnx mate

ok guys i have found the right ones---- not sure if there 19x8.5, 19x9.5, 19x10.5. the backs are alot wider than the fronts

untitledtpd2.png

untitlednd4.png

Axis Hiro - Five spokes slightly narrow on the way to a deep polished lip, then bend back over the lip for an even deeper stance. The Hiro has perfect staggered fitments for Nissan 350Z, Infiniti G35, Toyota Supra, Mustang, Lexus GS, Lexus SC and even certain Volkswagens and more of today's modern sedans and coupes in 19x8.5, 19x9.5 and a huge 19x10.5. The Hiro boasts generous caliper clearance and will even fit over factory Brembo brakes and many aftermarket kits as well. The Hiro is very popular as a staggered wheel, but also has perfect fitments for non-staggered wheel fitments like Acura TL, TSX, Honda Accord, Mitsubishi Evo VIII and IX, Nissan Maxima, Scion tC, Subaru WRX and STi. Now available in 18 inch applications in non-staggered sizes.

well let me know...

also can you please tell me the offset and width... if they are genuine axis they will be in the inner of the rim

Do you have any pics of the wheels on the car??

What brand tyres?

Yes, i am interested but want to know the width and offset. The details in the description don't help. They just give the "possible" size.

Thanks

Bolt Patterns guys i might swap for after market parts for my 33 gtst. im after---dump from turbo to cat---turbo---power fc---ect. let me know what u got. tnx

5x100, 5x114

5x114

thats all the info there is, sorry guys

this is not my car its just a pic of the rims. not sure what size!!

grrrrkm8.png

Edited by r33gtst-ser2
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...