Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Is this crap or what for $150 per month!??180439983.png

how the hell could a $150 a month plan net you that result?

im guessing thats a business plan? which would then involve offering you proper SLA and resolution solutions such as corp tech support rather then the usual rubbish support that plebs get?

Who the hell are you guys with, im on optus cable which is meant to be uncapped for speed and get no where near you guys....

OOpS shouls have looked at the bottom right of the pic.

Optus Cables and pretty much all Cable has a max speed of 9900kbit. ADSL2+ has a theoretical max speed of 24000. (altho i believe Telstra have plans to upgrade their Cable infrastructure to support 30000)

god dam it... havent been able to get 17600 for ages now...

181644999.png

Theres also this

http://www.ozspeedtest.com/bandwidth/

do a 15MB test

Mirror: OptusNet

Data: 15 MB

Test Time: 12.68 secs

Your line speed is 9.88 Mbps (9885 kbps).

Your download speed is 1.21 MB/s (1236 KB/s).

Here at work:

181756500.png

At home i get around 5000k/800k, my download usage last month :)

aug2007usage.jpg

179636841.png

Total Tests Taken: 48

Fastest Download: 17695 kb/s

Fastest Upload: 44648 kb/s

Average Download: 9350 kb/s

Average Upload: 23904 kb/s

:)

but from homes only 5000 because my modems old and crappy and thats the max

wow thats some fast upload u got there, who is Philip Morris Information Services?

Here at work:

181756500.png

At home i get around 5000k/800k, my download usage last month :)

aug2007usage.jpg

wow thats some fast upload u got there, who is Philip Morris Information Services?

with those home results i bet your with a high quaility isp mmmm lets see i reckon comcen and ya been on whirpool a lot like lots of other people arguing with james m and con the conman .

am i good or what . lol

how the hell could a $150 a month plan net you that result?

im guessing thats a business plan? which would then involve offering you proper SLA and resolution solutions such as corp tech support rather then the usual rubbish support that plebs get?

Optus Cables and pretty much all Cable has a max speed of 9900kbit. ADSL2+ has a theoretical max speed of 24000. (altho i believe Telstra have plans to upgrade their Cable infrastructure to support 30000)

god dam it... havent been able to get 17600 for ages now...

181644999.png

Theres also this

http://www.ozspeedtest.com/bandwidth/

do a 15MB test

Mirror: OptusNet

Data: 15 MB

Test Time: 12.68 secs

Your line speed is 9.88 Mbps (9885 kbps).

Your download speed is 1.21 MB/s (1236 KB/s).

Test run on 04/09/2007 @ 05:41 PM

Mirror: OptusNet

Data: 15 MB

Test Time: 11.36 secs

Your line speed is 11.03 Mbps (11034 kbps).

Your download speed is 1.35 MB/s (1379 KB/s).

wtf... theres no Melbourne server tonight... had to go to canberra

181880338.png

Tracid - PMIS is the company i work for... even though we arent an ISP lol

Surely people know what Phillip Morris make.

Test run on 05/09/2007 @ 06:09 PM

Mirror: Telstra Bigpond

Data: 9 MB

Test Time: 4.17 secs

Your line speed is 18.12 Mbps (18118 kbps).

Your download speed is 2.21 MB/s (2265 KB/s).

Test run on 05/09/2007 @ 06:12 PM

Mirror: OptusNet

Data: 15 MB

Test Time: 7.16 secs

Your line speed is 17.51 Mbps (17514 kbps).

Your download speed is 2.14 MB/s (2189 KB/s).

did it again just to be sure. not as quick but not too bad. :P now I want to try and beat my high score!!

182360611.png

lol, I love this test. finally something I'm good at. clicking a button.

I like the summary page:

"Your Global rank: faster than 99% of connections"

"Your Country rank: faster than 99% of connections"

sweet.

just got 28614 but checked out the best in my summary. someone using my ip at my work has got

Fastest Download:

48324 kb/s

Fastest Upload:

36337 kb/s

now that is fairly honking!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...