Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all just wanted to ask the forum members a quick question. I have a g-tech pro the rr version so you kno I had to take my car for a spin to see how the device works. I have everything setup and i went for a straight line run, I must say it disturbed the hell out of me I have a 95 gtst with the following mods 3" turbo back exhaust, pod filter, fmic, stage three clutch, boost turned up to 10 psi, plugs gapped to .8mm, no tune and running 91 octane gas as that is the only gas available over here and it is probably 95 ron to you guys cause we import directly from the U.S.A.. Nehow heres the prob I took my car on a quater mile run and came up with some disturbing numbers FOR HORSEPOWER i got a figure of 183 and a quatermile time of 15 seconds on average. Now the time isn't Really an issue but the hp figure, 183 comeon I have to have more horses than that and I have the weight of my vehicle as 3500 pounds. With the mods I have listed does this power figure seem correct. Also wanted to know if I could use xylene in place of toluene as an octane booster and if there are any negative effects to the cars engine as compared to using toluene? Thanks in advance guys.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/183055-g-tech-pro-rr/
Share on other sites

your ECU has probably dropped back onto the lower octane maps, which is cauing you to lose power. depending on how realistic the dyno is, you probably shoudlnt expect much more than 200 or so hp with those mods anyway... i'd say once you get some 98ron fuel and reset the ECU, you might get 200 - 220 hp.

For benchmarking purposes, I got ~230rwhp with 3" turbo back xorst, high flow cat, FMIC, 12psi, pod filter, cold air intake and SAFC2 tuned by matt spry @ PITS.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/183055-g-tech-pro-rr/#findComment-3319507
Share on other sites

weird, do you have the exact weight of the car?

I've got a G-Tech pro RR at home, that's the one with the serial cable to download the data?

basically what i do is,

plug it in:

put in car weight first

then calibrate the RPM

then do the axis calibration(what a pain in the arse to do)

then put in a shift light, i have it starting at 7000(so two lights hit on), then 7500 the four lights go on and I change gear

183hp sounds really shifty though :S I got 194 on my GTS4 auto!!! and a 14.6 1/4, so there must be something odd going on :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/183055-g-tech-pro-rr/#findComment-3319599
Share on other sites

oh and I'm using 98RON so you might want to see if you can get some better petrol, then once that happens, reset the ECU(remove positive from battery, then put foot on the brake for a few seconds), then try it :D hopefully it gets better, post up your new scores :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/183055-g-tech-pro-rr/#findComment-3319601
Share on other sites

weird, do you have the exact weight of the car?

I've got a G-Tech pro RR at home, that's the one with the serial cable to download the data?

basically what i do is,

plug it in:

put in car weight first

then calibrate the RPM

then do the axis calibration(what a pain in the arse to do)

then put in a shift light, i have it starting at 7000(so two lights hit on), then 7500 the four lights go on and I change gear

183hp sounds really shifty though :S I got 194 on my GTS4 auto!!! and a 14.6 1/4, so there must be something odd going on :D

Dont Have the exact weight just put in 3500 pounds as a rounded off figure. The axis calibration is when you take off to get the g-tech started but only roll forward a couple a feet so that the directional arrows work, did that if thats what u meant.

oh and I'm using 98RON so you might want to see if you can get some better petrol, then once that happens, reset the ECU(remove positive from battery, then put foot on the brake for a few seconds), then try it :) hopefully it gets better, post up your new scores :D

Yea my gas is real shitty over here only gas available is your 95 ron equivalent. So I'm gonna start mixing my own brew getting the ron as close to 98 as I can then I will reset ecu once I have ran a complete tank thro my system and start using my mix everytime I fill up and see what happens. Will post my results. I really think its the gas, plus I have no tune the tune is stock.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/183055-g-tech-pro-rr/#findComment-3320922
Share on other sites

The Gtech uses the weight as an input to the calculation of horsepower, so that needs to be accurate and include everything - so dont forget to add the weight of the driver (and passengers). Also it will read a bit low on horsepower as it assumes no wind resistance.

The quarter mile time on the other hand is directly calculated from the accelerometer input, and should be very accurate.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/183055-g-tech-pro-rr/#findComment-3320968
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey everyone, just wanted to let you know about an app I use to track the modifications, repairs, servicing etc I do to my R33 GTR. You might like to use it as well. I'm biased because my son just wrote and released it! But I think you might find it useful to... https://trackmymods.com  
    • Hey everyone, been on here for a while, but never introduced myself before. 1st import was a R32 GTS Type M, then R33 GTS, now R33 GTR - each one sold to help pay for the next one. Over the years my son has seen me modify and do changes to my imports and was one of the reasons for him to build an app for car enthusiasts like us. (He can only afford a 2007 Honda at the moment, but he'll get there!) Anyway, bit of a proud Dad moment as he's released an app that I use and you all might like to as well. https://trackmymods.com  
    • It will sound tragic and you wished you didn't have 1x exhaust per turbo. There's a reason why most S55 owners change to a single mid pipe.
    • Echo the comments about the well preserved condition it's in. It has the aero bumper too for extra points. Nice car, and please keep it like that! 🙂
    • 1. There are no real performance benefits. It sounds different, and as the pipes are not as large diameter you can claw back some undercar clearance or run lower (if that's your thing). 2. Twin pipes, offering exactly the same cross sectional area as a single pipe** will have higher pressure drop - so will not flow as well. That's because there is more surface area of wall per cross sectional pipe area, hence more frictional losses. ** But of course, it is almost impossible to get 2 pipes that are exactly the same XS area as a given typical single pipe. eg, 2x2" is not the same as 1x 3", although it is close. If the 2x pipes add up to less XS area than the single - it will just be flat out worse. If the 2x pipes add up to a bit more than the single, then it might come out as a wash. If the 2x pipes are substantially more XS area than the single, then it will probably flow a little better. 3. No. Why would there be? What have cats got to do with boost creep?*** ***But for f**ks' sake, please run a cat. 4. If you want.
×
×
  • Create New...