Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thanks sky...the result was only 2kw short of its best ever pump fuel figure. Considering how hard we used to push the pump fuel tunes its really impressive to almost top the figure given the limits set.

the plugs were everyones favorite BCPR7ES's....we ran something colder with different style electrode...even they were not the optimum plug for the application.

1100+hp turbo vs a pair of 460hp turbos, its easy to see why its making around the same power but easier paul. it should wake up a hell of a lot more with some decent boost behind it

make sure u grab a plot of afr & timing too please paul

  • Replies 682
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1100+hp turbo vs a pair of 460hp turbos, its easy to see why its making around the same power but easier paul. it should wake up a hell of a lot more with some decent boost behind it

make sure u grab a plot of afr & timing too please paul

i remember when Mark was tuning the Autronic ECU with the GT-RS's the difference between 22 and 25psi was mad...one made good power, the other made the car almost jump off the dyno. They really woke up and it was only 3 measly psi difference.

AFR power and torque only.

i remember when Mark was tuning the Autronic ECU with the GT-RS's the difference between 22 and 25psi was mad...one made good power, the other made the car almost jump off the dyno. They really woke up and it was only 3 measly psi difference.

AFR power and torque only.

all i was interested in was the amount of timing inaccuracy there is up in the rev range, i'm assuming ur still using the factory cas only for timing? could be something worth looking into, even if u dont want to give out those details

all i was interested in was the amount of timing inaccuracy there is up in the rev range, i'm assuming ur still using the factory cas only for timing? could be something worth looking into, even if u dont want to give out those details

we use the Nissan CAS for pump fuel...have another set-up for race fuel when we 'wick it up'.

Edited by DiRTgarage
why would you change the cas? the vi-pec uses a digital signal

couple of reasons...crank twist and belt deflection. Mark says its the way to go on a WOT high rpm drag car...im just doing as im told by the master. Its no fluke he's the 3rd fastest in the world, his car is ultra consistent and reliable. The custom set-up does not use a tooth style trigger wheel mounted on the nose of the crank...its nice and stealthy. :P Im sure Shane knows the set-up im refering to.

Edited by DiRTgarage
couple of reasons...crank twist and belt deflection. Mark says its the way to go on a WOT high rpm drag car...im just doing as im told by the master. Its no fluke he's the 3rd fastest in the world, his car is ultra consistent and reliable. The custom set-up does not use a tooth style trigger wheel mounted on the nose of the crank...its nice and stealthy. :thumbsup: Im sure Shane knows the set-up im refering to.

ah yes so u do, i couldnt remember if it was you or mark that used that 'backwards' setup

Paul will you always be running the bell mouth on the turbo with no filter?

Nice result.

Will a power band of 3500 rpm be enough to get you down the quarter faster than before with out a super dooper gear box?

Paul will you always be running the bell mouth on the turbo with no filter?

Nice result.

Will a power band of 3500 rpm be enough to get you down the quarter faster than before with out a super dooper gear box?

No i will not always run the Japanese air filter...getting a pipe made up this week to suit 2 large K&N items.

Yeah its a nice result but its not a real indication of what it will do...the dyno printout is pretty useless as the line disappears off the page ill get Wanye to rescale it tomorrow. The AFR's read by the dyno on the 465 run were closer to 11 than 11.4...yikes! But this was may have been due to the plug change as it was spot on 11.4's the night before.

I do have a super dooper gearbox...its a PPG fully optioned straight cut dogbox. The car shouldn't see much less than 7000rpm down the strip if im on my game.

Took it for a run on my 'test track' today...its nuts already!

Edited by DiRTgarage
I was thinking something sequential. Is yours still a H pattern?

What ever you use it still takes nothing away from the car being nuts. Good work.

Yes its a H pattern. The box is so slick to change and not a hassle at all on the street once you work out the way it likes to be shifted. On the upshift you would be hard pressed to even know it was a dogbox and on the downshift a simple increase of about 500rpm double shuffling allows it to select the lower gear without the clunk.

Edited by DiRTgarage
1100+hp turbo vs a pair of 460hp turbos, its easy to see why its making around the same power but easier paul. it should wake up a hell of a lot more with some decent boost behind it

Paul, are there 2 different trims of the GTR-s kit? Or did you bolt on 2 SR20 spec ones? When I bought mine they were advertised as a 700ps kit for Rb26.

Thanks

Edited by Evocoop
Yes its a H pattern. The box is so slick to change and not a hassle at all on the street once you work out the way it likes to be shifted. On the upshift you would be hard pressed to even know it was a dogbox and on the downshift a simple increase of about 500rpm double shuffling allows it to select the lower gear without the clunk.

Hey paul, do you know what marks fastest time was with the hks t51r on street tyres?

Cheers, mat.

Haha, im keen to see his GTRS graph at 22psi vs the 25psi one

No doubt the single wouldnt be as much fun for what i use the GTR for compared to Pauls use, but then he's not worried about lag :thumbsup:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah they charge a little extra for mods , last year I noted no mods but I did have an exhaust fitted after that so  better to let them know cause these kinds of things can cause the policy to be void if you ever need to claim.
    • Hello, just just bought an 1999 enr34 with a stock rb25neo and I'm looking to upgrade the engine to 500whp I know some basic things but wondering if there are things I'll need to do to upgrade the stock block and all the bits and pieces to achieve this.
    • Thanks everyone for the replies and suggestions. Got the seats out (hoping I could find some existing grommets but no such luck). By tapping and measuring etc. I could figure out where I could drill through if needed. But first I borrowed an inspection camera and managed to go through factory holes in the chassis rail and could see that the captive nut was holding steady which is why it could retighten. So it was indeed a stripped section of thread, so I applied downforce by levering the bolt head with a screwdriver and went slowly back and forth until it came out. Camera helped a lot cos I could monitor that the captive nut was holding tight. Now I just have one very seized main subframe nut to tackle 馃槄
    • BOVs do have a purpose, if you ever log pressure before and after the throttle body, you will see a spike pre throttle on lift off from a WOT condition. Enough to bend throttle blades / damage e-throttle motors or simple assist in blowing off cooler pipes. FWIW, the above on really applies to those running at least 2 bar of boost. OP shouldn't have an issue, on the other hand, here are some videos of my shit box over a decade ago with some succulent dose with the airbox on and off. That shit box is unrecognisable these days 馃珷    
    • I've tried all different combinations of BOVs/ no BOV and stock bypass valves over the years, on gear changes the stock bypass valve seems to get the car back on boost quicker because in part the turbos wheel speed isn't being slowed down by reversion, although they have issues holding boost much over the stock setting. Most aftermarket BOVs you can adjust the spring, tighter will make it open later and close sooner, but in my experience it'll cause a bit of flutter at low load/rpm anyway. I've also got some input into this whole no bov causing turbo wear, never had an issue on any on my turbos HOWEVER, I got my R33 GTST with 200k kms on it, with from what I can see still has the original turbo, no lateral shaft play but has about 4-5mm of play in and out which to me seems like a worn thrust bearing from years (100-150k kms?) of turbo flutter running no bov, so maybe there is some truth to it in the long run. But that'll never stop me loving the Stutututu while I have the car.   OP just wants to know if he can run a atmo vented BOV with no major issues and the answer is YES, plenty of people do it, there's no harm in installing it and seeing how it runs before spending $$$ on an aftermarket ecu, last time I bought a Nistune it was $2400 for install and a tune , unsure of todays prices but you get me. Crazy money to spend just to fix the minor inconvenience of stalling that can be overcome by letting the revs come down to near idle before putting the clutch in or a little bit of throttle to avoid it. You're better off leaving the ecu and tune for after a bigger turbo/injectors have been installed to take full advantage of the tune and get your moneys worth.   Let OP have his Whoosh sound without trying to break his bank haha
  • Create New...