Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thanks sky...the result was only 2kw short of its best ever pump fuel figure. Considering how hard we used to push the pump fuel tunes its really impressive to almost top the figure given the limits set.

the plugs were everyones favorite BCPR7ES's....we ran something colder with different style electrode...even they were not the optimum plug for the application.

1100+hp turbo vs a pair of 460hp turbos, its easy to see why its making around the same power but easier paul. it should wake up a hell of a lot more with some decent boost behind it

make sure u grab a plot of afr & timing too please paul

  • Replies 682
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1100+hp turbo vs a pair of 460hp turbos, its easy to see why its making around the same power but easier paul. it should wake up a hell of a lot more with some decent boost behind it

make sure u grab a plot of afr & timing too please paul

i remember when Mark was tuning the Autronic ECU with the GT-RS's the difference between 22 and 25psi was mad...one made good power, the other made the car almost jump off the dyno. They really woke up and it was only 3 measly psi difference.

AFR power and torque only.

i remember when Mark was tuning the Autronic ECU with the GT-RS's the difference between 22 and 25psi was mad...one made good power, the other made the car almost jump off the dyno. They really woke up and it was only 3 measly psi difference.

AFR power and torque only.

all i was interested in was the amount of timing inaccuracy there is up in the rev range, i'm assuming ur still using the factory cas only for timing? could be something worth looking into, even if u dont want to give out those details

all i was interested in was the amount of timing inaccuracy there is up in the rev range, i'm assuming ur still using the factory cas only for timing? could be something worth looking into, even if u dont want to give out those details

we use the Nissan CAS for pump fuel...have another set-up for race fuel when we 'wick it up'.

Edited by DiRTgarage
why would you change the cas? the vi-pec uses a digital signal

couple of reasons...crank twist and belt deflection. Mark says its the way to go on a WOT high rpm drag car...im just doing as im told by the master. Its no fluke he's the 3rd fastest in the world, his car is ultra consistent and reliable. The custom set-up does not use a tooth style trigger wheel mounted on the nose of the crank...its nice and stealthy. :P Im sure Shane knows the set-up im refering to.

Edited by DiRTgarage
couple of reasons...crank twist and belt deflection. Mark says its the way to go on a WOT high rpm drag car...im just doing as im told by the master. Its no fluke he's the 3rd fastest in the world, his car is ultra consistent and reliable. The custom set-up does not use a tooth style trigger wheel mounted on the nose of the crank...its nice and stealthy. :thumbsup: Im sure Shane knows the set-up im refering to.

ah yes so u do, i couldnt remember if it was you or mark that used that 'backwards' setup

Paul will you always be running the bell mouth on the turbo with no filter?

Nice result.

Will a power band of 3500 rpm be enough to get you down the quarter faster than before with out a super dooper gear box?

Paul will you always be running the bell mouth on the turbo with no filter?

Nice result.

Will a power band of 3500 rpm be enough to get you down the quarter faster than before with out a super dooper gear box?

No i will not always run the Japanese air filter...getting a pipe made up this week to suit 2 large K&N items.

Yeah its a nice result but its not a real indication of what it will do...the dyno printout is pretty useless as the line disappears off the page ill get Wanye to rescale it tomorrow. The AFR's read by the dyno on the 465 run were closer to 11 than 11.4...yikes! But this was may have been due to the plug change as it was spot on 11.4's the night before.

I do have a super dooper gearbox...its a PPG fully optioned straight cut dogbox. The car shouldn't see much less than 7000rpm down the strip if im on my game.

Took it for a run on my 'test track' today...its nuts already!

Edited by DiRTgarage
I was thinking something sequential. Is yours still a H pattern?

What ever you use it still takes nothing away from the car being nuts. Good work.

Yes its a H pattern. The box is so slick to change and not a hassle at all on the street once you work out the way it likes to be shifted. On the upshift you would be hard pressed to even know it was a dogbox and on the downshift a simple increase of about 500rpm double shuffling allows it to select the lower gear without the clunk.

Edited by DiRTgarage
1100+hp turbo vs a pair of 460hp turbos, its easy to see why its making around the same power but easier paul. it should wake up a hell of a lot more with some decent boost behind it

Paul, are there 2 different trims of the GTR-s kit? Or did you bolt on 2 SR20 spec ones? When I bought mine they were advertised as a 700ps kit for Rb26.

Thanks

Edited by Evocoop
Yes its a H pattern. The box is so slick to change and not a hassle at all on the street once you work out the way it likes to be shifted. On the upshift you would be hard pressed to even know it was a dogbox and on the downshift a simple increase of about 500rpm double shuffling allows it to select the lower gear without the clunk.

Hey paul, do you know what marks fastest time was with the hks t51r on street tyres?

Cheers, mat.

Haha, im keen to see his GTRS graph at 22psi vs the 25psi one

No doubt the single wouldnt be as much fun for what i use the GTR for compared to Pauls use, but then he's not worried about lag :thumbsup:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Means something is not set up right, tune/calibration related.  
    • Finally replaced the previous temporary mesh indicator surrounds (temporary was the last 10+ years 😂) with a 3D printed GTR style version for the front indicators. I think it looks a lot nicer than the old setup and at least the indicators now point in the correct direction rather than angled off. Needed a little bit of tweaking to deal with the intercooler piping but got there in the end. Old and new photos below. 
    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
×
×
  • Create New...