Jump to content
SAU Community

  

77 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

are u taking wind resistant into them calculations , i think the question is in general do wider tyres have more grip than skinny tyres not do 225 goodyears on a supra have more grip than 235 falkens on a ford at 34.6759657842 degrees

Hahaha :laughing-smiley-014:

Plus fat tyres look hektik.

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

contactpatch1.gif

Taken from the tire bible. Wider tyres don't always mean more contact area/more grip.

In general, I would assume wider tyres would have more grip.

Edited by adam-__-

Short answer, here is a good if somewhat detailed explanation.

http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_108915/article.html - but you may need membership to acess it so i'll summarise. Grip is related to the coefficient of friction of the rubber compund of the tyre. This is in turn effected by heat. All things being equal Narrow tyres will generate more heat, thus depreciate quicker and lose grip faster, they also have less temperature stability. So a wider tyre can dissipate more heat, have greater temperature stability and should last longer. Thus given the same compound a wider tyre will generally have more grip. Pressure also plays a large role and dictates contact patch. Narrow tyes do have lower rolling resistance and are invariably better for fuel economy (once again provided they are at the correct pressure).

So yes $800 a tyre pirelli 225s will likely have an immense amount of grip due to the compound of rubber used. However as I understand it 265s can get away with a compound less advanced to result in the same amount of grip (they may also cost less), or with as advanced a compound should provide even higher grip levels and hopefully last longer (once again all things being equal).

wide tyres are always going to give a better amount of traction then skinny one's. When it comes to handling a wide tyre will give better grip, aslong as the wide tyre has wide wheels to match, the worst thing is to have tyres that bulge out over the rims alot as it gives a shit load of roll in the side wall of the tyre, which means you lose feel through the steering

when i raced karts we wernt aloud to use wet tyres at all . so if it rained we pumped the tryes right up so only the centre of tyre was on the road . less hydroplanng hence you could drive faster . not sure if i would like to try it out on my skyline tho

lol @ ^

lets face it, the broad answer to this broad question is - wider is better.

your getting too technical.

think of it this way. these two guys had a few beers, watching ralph tv, maybe some cones, and then 1 says skinny tires are better than wide.

what do you do?

*SLAP* i'm rick james bitch

You are 1000% right mate thats what happened i was have a few drinks washing my car and my mate was saying how my tyres are to big and his his skinnyer tyres griped betta, and funny enough we had another disagreement tonight about it again.

so far i have seen fatter is better and sum people have quoted which is the truest thing i have herd which is "THIS IS THE ONLY TIME IN LIFE WHEN FATTER IS BETTER"

thanks u to0 every1 so far

lol this is a big bug of mine, i HATE...absolutely cannot stand !! seeing any car that is relatively performance oriented on skinny tyres, i have 255's and i still think theyre too narrow haha, but they do look good from behind. aside from the better traction i think wider tyres give you more road presence, make your car look more beasty :)...if he wants thin tyres tell him to stick to a bike

p.s. to whoever was talking about in the wet thinner is better, im sure thats only to a certain extent, would have more to do with tread right ?

lol @ ^

lets face it, the broad answer to this broad question is - wider is better.

your getting too technical.

think of it this way. these two guys had a few beers, watching ralph tv, maybe some cones, and then 1 says skinny tires are better than wide.

what do you do?

*SLAP* i'm rick james bitch

ROFL!

i had crappy 245's, and now have federal 235's.

it grips alot more than it used to.

i guess it's all down to compound and quality!

Fat tyres man, stretched!!

Looks tough as. I got stretched 8.5" wide on the back of my R32.. soo nice when you see it cruising from behind with all that camber!

I want wider though, but 8.5" just tucks in under the guard though.

how about on the front?

does a wider tyre offer more "GRIP" during cornering compared to a skinnier tyre?

all other things being equal.

say on the same car, on the same day, same corner, same brand and compound of rubber, same speed etc..

put on a set of 255's all round, then same thing with 225's all round.

which tyre offers more "GRIP" during cornering/turning?

staightline in the dry is obvious.. bigger contact patch is better for traction.

Edited by GTST
Fat tyres man, stretched!!

Looks tough as. I got stretched 8.5" wide on the back of my R32.. soo nice when you see it cruising from behind with all that camber!

I want wider though, but 8.5" just tucks in under the guard though.

2 degrees neg camber on my rears, 18x9.5 rims with 235's stretched on there >_<

Very good way to burn through tyres and not as efficient as it could be, but it looks the goods

I showed my mate tonight and he said but im not talking about a drift car like every1 on here are. which i had to recorrect him by saying over all and he still beleave skinnyer is bettta so the 2 people who voted i rekon your skylines must look very um diffrent with 185s on it

running a fair shithouse 185mm tire on my stockies with full tread doesnt compare to running bald bridgestone grid 2's with 255's on the rear and 235s on the front.

bridgestones absoloutly shat all over these cheap as chip tyres i got on at the moment.

i voted for skinny because i have a non turbo, i like to think it handles better then it really does. especially having shitty brakes and an auto tranny.

who am i kidding? im humming for a 5 stud conversion and some decent rims and tyres......also a turbo and a manual gearbox....in other words a completely different skyline.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • FWIW, as well as a basic immobiliser/remote unlock (all basic units give you those 2 things), I would also install a 4g tracker in any car I cared about. Just hide it anywhere that won't be found in a rushed look and preferably get something with a built in battery backup so it stays online for a while when the battery is removed or flat While its not a car, when our car trailer was stolen in that den of crime Sydney about a decade ago, the cops were watching from the bloke's neighbour's lawn within about 2 hours until he started swapping the plates and putting up the gumtree ad.   Obviously it is still not undefeatable (eg parking it up for a few days somewhere without sky sight) but it greatly improves your chances of getting it back quickly and with less damage
    • Instead of magic keyphrases I wonder if something can be done with auto complete. Similar to how user names are handled already. When you type '@' and follow with letters, it'll search across all usernames. It might work to have the same for forum topics. Some key to trigger it and then text search across all thread names and it'll insert the name and URL when pressing enter.
    • Hmmm.... It's actually a bit weird. Here's the key bit of the diagram. I've circled what I'm pretty sure is the high beam indicator on the cluster. It appears to be just in parallel with one of the high beam lamp globes. Meaning, that however the high beams get lit, the indicator should also be lit. So there shouldn't be any difference between being on normal headlight main beam, or just flashing. I've followed the physical diagram (which is not so easily summarised in a single snip, so I didn't put it up here) and it agrees with what you can see here. If you struggle to follow this crap....let me explain some of it. I always struggle when I first look at this - even though I have looked specifically at this more than once in the past. We'll start with the flash. The flash is triggered by pulling the dip switch back, right? That is indicated on the diagram by the P position on the switch block labelled "Light SW", on the RHS of the snip. The bottom-right most terminal is connected to ground. That's that wire line going down to the bottom. The next terminal up is connected to the bottom terminal when the switch is pulled back. That provides ground to wire LA33, which is connected to the coil of the relay in the middle of the snip, "Headlamp relay (2M)". That relay always has power on the other side of the coil, from fuse #19 above it. When that relay is triggered, the two main headlamp fuses #32 & #33 above feed through the relay down onto wires LA31 and LA32, which are connected into the wires that go to the main beams, LA04 and LA06. The cluster indicator is connected to LA32 also. When the main beams are on normally, the light switch ("Light SW" again) is in the M position. Power comes in for the left and right sides on LA34 and LA36, via the other light switch (the one on the binnacle, called "Light SW (Instrument)" on the diagram). Obviously that switch needs to be in the 2nd position, because that's headlights. 1st position is parkers. The same main headlamp fuses #32 & #33 feed through that switch, out via LA34&36 to the stalk switch, and of out of the stalk switch via LA04 and LA06 to the headlamps. From there, it is no different to the flasher version. I really don't know why they bothered with the flash relay. They probably didn't want to add another contact in the stalk switch - but I'm damn sure that's what I would have done. Just reverse the order of power feed, so that it goes from the fuses to the stalk switch first, and add another contact for flashing. Everything would have worked just the same, but less complicated. /bitchrant
    • I think the solution Pac posted in the other thread is the way to go with the top screen; I have an ADM Q50 and I only use it for 2 things: 1. Reverse or front camera as triggered automatically by Reverse selection or the front sonars, and you can also call up the front left (or front) camera when parking by hitting the camera button on the centre console if necessary 2. Navigation. I can assure you that getting hold of a 10 year old nav system is utterly useless. The ADM system still has Inifiniti dealers marked (always give me a good laugh), is missing all new freeways, uses fixed speed by road type to determine arrival time, no traffic/re-routing, no speed cameras, no user reported cameras etc etc you get the idea So, Pac posted in the other thread about a box that plugs into the USB C and gives you full Android OS to run whatever modern/connected nav you want on the top screen, and it still automatically switches back to function 1 above when required because it runs within the head unit. The other modern alternative is the latest version of the Tesla screen like this:  https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005007511322502.html?spm=a2g0o.productlist.main.25.33cefEZifEZibq&algo_pvid=cdae429c-aa8d-437f-a436-c727fee85461&algo_exp_id=cdae429c-aa8d-437f-a436-c727fee85461-12&pdp_npi=4%40dis!AUD!2181.36!1265.19!!!9834.81!5704.20!%402101c71a17362022663526105e36d7!12000041077843545!sea!AU!163137612!X&curPageLogUid=F9811g8oqx5H&utparam-url=scene%3Asearch|query_from%3A But I haven't looked into whether it is compatible with Australian 4G bands yet so it may require a separate 4g dongle to provide data
    • In the 32 race car, I basically run what Gary told me and it is lovely across a range of conditions which is what I needed. I've got revalved bilsteins, adjustable solid sway bars, adjustable bushes all round. Just looking at Neil's R33 GTST and it has pretty much the same on board, Gary Bilsteins, Selby/whiteline sway bars.  Gary knows suspension generally and these cars specifically very well across street, street/track and track only use and gives a very well balanced set up. Just be aware his preference is for light springs and heavy sway bars, there is another school of though (eg MCA) that prefer lighter swaybars and heavier springs/shocks. The evo I raced had that setup and it was also very nice so there are multiple ways to skin cats.
×
×
  • Create New...