Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey everyone this is my first post on here so im sorry if i have repeated a post, i ran a search but could not find any relevant info. I have a 93 model GTs33 and after running for about 15 minutes at normal pace no excesive speeds etc. the exhaust is too hot to touch and can be heard cooling down from a fare distance away is this normal? Or could it be prehaps caused by un-burnt fuel in making its way to the exhaust. Any help would be greatly appreciated. The exhaust is 2 and a half inches. I am not sure of the brand but i can check tomorrow morning. Cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/184462-high-exhaust-heat/
Share on other sites

to help us help you, we'll need a few answers to some questions.

the exhaust will always be hot, what do you mean by 'too hot to touch'? with your hand?

what do you mean by 'can be heard cooling down'? describe the sound.

is it a catback exhaust? full system exhaust? mild steel? titanium? stainless steel?

un-burnt fuel will give a rich, overfuelling exhaust smell.

eug

No matter what exhaust you have, what car you drive, unburnt fuel or not, if the car has been running for 15 minutes its going to be too hot too touch with your hand :)

Unburnt fuel should not really affect the heat of your exhaust. If you're running really rich, your car may backfire on full throttle or gearshifts and you will hear a POP sound. Also, the smell issue as Eug mentioned.

Also, why is this a concern for you? Unless the exhaust is making funny noises or glowing red I doubt its really an issue.

Edited by Yawn
why anyone would want to touch an exhaust after driving their car (hard or not) is beyond me.

some people 'love' their car way too much.

Reggie, if you're not already on the new sau-qld forums, do check it out. http://www.sauqld.com/ipb/index.php?

yeah trying to touch an exhaust that has had hot gas throuh it is rather silly.

unburnt fuel will actually cool the exhaust not heat it up. if it is unburnt then it means that it didn't reach a high enough temp to ignite so it will be cooler than the gas from the fuel that did ignite.

is the sound of it cooling down a ting ting noise? if it is, that is just the metal contracting as it cools. yuo will hear a tin roof on a house doing the same thing on a hot day. it is normal.

Its stainless steel full system. Why would i touch my exhaust? Because if i can hear it cooling down, (and yes it is a tinging noise) from inside my house and the car is about 20m away im curious to know how hot it is. and as none of my previous cars (VS commodore and subaru liberty) got this hot, i was wondering why a skyline should be so different.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep super expensive, awesome. It would be a cool passion project if I had the money.
    • Getting the setup right, is likely to cost multiples of the purchase price of the vehicle.
    • So it's a ginormous undertaking that will be a massive headache but will be sorta cool if pulled off right. And also expensive. I'm sure it'll be as expensive as buying the car itself. I don't think you could just do this build without upgrading other things to take the extra power. Probably lots of custom stuff as well. All this assuming the person has mechanical knowledge. I'm stupid enough to try it but smart enough to realize there's gonna be mistakes even with an experienced mechanic. I'm a young bloke on minimum wage that gets dopamine from air being moved around and got his knowledge from a Donut video on how engines work.]   Thanks for the response though super informative!
    • Yes, it is entirely possible to twincharge a Skyline. It is not....without problems though. There was a guy did it to an SOHC RB30 (and I think maybe it became or already was a 25/30) in a VL Commode. It was a monster. The idea is that you can run both compressors at relatively low pressure ratios, yet still end up with a quite large total pressure ratio because they multiply, not add, boost levels. So, if the blower is spun to give a 1.4:1 PR (ie, it would make ~40 kPa of boost on its own) and the turbo is set up to give a 1.4:1 PR also, then you don't get 40+40 = 80 kPa of boost, you get 1.4*1.4, which is pretty close to 100 kPa of boost. It's free real estate! This only gets better as the PRs increase. If both are set up to yield about 1.7 PR, which is only about 70 kPa or 10ish psi of boost each, you actually end up with about 1.9 bar of boost! So, inevitably it was a bit of a monster. The blower is set up as the 2nd compressor, closest to the motor, because it is a positive displacement unit, so to get the benefit of putting it in series with another compressor, it has to go second. If you put it first, it has to be bigger, because it will be breathing air at atmospheric pressure. The turbo's compressor ends up needing to be a lot larger than you'd expect, and optimised to be efficient at large mass flows and low PRs. The turbo's exhaust side needs to be quite relaxed, because it's not trying to provide the power to produce all the boost, and it has to handle ALL the exhaust flow. I think you need a much bigger wastegate than you might expect. Certainly bigger than for an engine just making the same power level turbo only. The blower effectively multiplies the base engine size. So if you put a 1.7 PR blower on a 2.5L Skyline, it's like turboing a 4.2L engine. Easy to make massive power. Plus, because the engine is blown, the blower makes boost before the turbo can even think about making boost, so it's like having that 4.2L engine all the way from idle. Fattens the torque delivery up massively. But, there are downsides. The first is trying to work out how to size the turbo according to the above. The second is that you pretty much have to give up on aircon. There's not enough space to mount everything you need. You might be able to go elec power steering pump, hidden away somewhere. but it would still be a struggle to get both the AC and the blower on the same side of the engine. Then, you have to ponder whether you want to truly intercool the thing. Ideally you would put a cooler between the turbo and the blower, so as to drop the heat out of it and gain even more benefit from the blower's positive displacement nature. But that would really need to be a water to air core, because you're never going to find enough room to run 2 sets of boost pipes out to air to air cores in the front of the car. But you still need to aftercool after the blower, because both these compressors will add a lot of heat, and you wil have the same temperature (more or less) as if you produced all that boost with a single stage, and no one in their right mind would try to run a petrol engine on high boost without a cooler (unless not using petrol, which we shall ignore for the moment). I'm of the opinnion that 2x water to air cores in the bay and 2x HXs out the front is probably the only sensible way to avoid wasting a lot of room trying to fit in long runs of boost pipe. But the struggle to locate everything in the limited space available would still be a pretty bad optimisation problem. If it was an OEM, they'd throw 20 engineers at it for a year and let them test out 30 ideas before deciding on the best layout. And they'd have the freedom to develop bespoke castings and the like, for manifolds, housings, connecting pipes to/from compressors and cores. A single person in a garage can either have one shot at it and live with the result, or spend 5 years trying to get it right.
    • Good to know, thank you!
×
×
  • Create New...